Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimal surgical treatment and urological outcomes in boys with pelvic and urogenital rhabdomyosarcomas and soft tissue sarcomas

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of pelvic origin in boys often involve the urogenital organs. The optimal extensiveness of radical surgery has long been an issue of discussion, since exenterative surgeries result in severe urogenital adverse effects. We conducted a retrospective review of patients with pelvic STS treated in two regional center hospitals and assessed the radicality of surgery and the functional outcome of the bladder.

Patients

Medical records and surgical reports of nine cases (embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma 6, malignant triton tumor 2, suspected rhabdomyosarcoma 1) treated within 1997–2012 were reviewed. Site of origin was prostate in seven, retroperitoneal in two. Average follow-up period was 96 months.

Treatment and outcome

All cases were subjected to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Response was PR in four, SD in two, and PD in two. Radical surgery resulted in gross total resection in eight, and partial resection in one. Three underwent cystoprostatectomy, two cases underwent prostatectomy, and bladder-preserving tumor resection was carried out in four cases. At the last follow-up, three retained a functional bladder. Two required augmentation cystoplasty with intestinal conduits.

Conclusions

The majority of the on-going clinical trials recommend conservative surgery for bladder/prostate rhabdomyosarcoma, and to preserve the bladder function particularly in chemosensitive tumors. Some other groups, however, advocate the importance of radical surgery to prevent local relapse. These reports include heterogenous group of patients in the cohort, and therefore it is difficult to draw a conclusion of which approach truly contributes to the survival of the patients better. Future studies should evaluate bladder and sexual function objectively to establish reliable evidence regarding the benefit and adverse effects of different surgical approaches. These data would be informative to optimize the treatment balance for children with pelvic rhabdomyosarcomas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stevens MC (2005) Treatment for childhood rhabdomyosarcoma: the cost of cure. Lancet Oncol 6:77–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Raney RB, Maurer HM, Anderson JR, Andrassy RJ, Donaldson SS, Qualman SJ, Wharam MD, Wiener ES, Crist WM, The Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG) (2001) Major lessons from the IRS-I through IRS-IV studies as background for the current IRS-V treatment protocols. Sarcoma 5:9–15. doi:10.1080/13577140120048890

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Malempati S, Hawkins DS (2012) Rhabdomyosarcoma: review of the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Committee experience and the rationale fro current COG studies. Pediatr Blood Cancer 59:5–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Oberlin O, Rey A, Sanchez de Toledo J, Martelli H, Jenney ME, Scopinaro M, Bergeron C, Merks JH, Bouvet N, Ellershaw C, Kelsey A, Spooner D, Stevens MC (2012) Randomized comparison of intensified six-drug versus standard three-drug chemotherapy for high-risk nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma and other chemotherapy-sensitive childhood soft tissue sarcomas: long-term results from the International Society of Pediatric Oncology MMT95 study. J Clin Oncol 30:2457–2465. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.40.3287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Meza JL, Anderson J, Pappo AS, Meyer WH, Children’s Oncology Group (2006) Analysis of prognostic factors in patients with nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma treated on intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma studies III and IV: the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 24:3844–3851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stevens MC, Rey A, Bouvet N, Ellershaw C, Flamant F, Habrand JL, Marsden HB, Martelli H, Sanchez de Toledo J, Spicer RD, Spooner D, Terrier-Lacombe MJ, van Unnik A, Oberlin O (2005) Treatment of nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma in childhood and adolescence: third study of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology—SIOP Malignant Mesenchymal Tumor 89. J Clin Oncol 23:2618–2628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Filipas D, Fisch M, Stein R, Gutjahr P, Hohenfellner R, Thüroff JW (2004) Rhabdomyosarcoma of the bladder, prostate or vagina: the role of surgery. BJU Int 93:125–129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Raney RB, Stoner JA, Waltherhouse DO, Andrassy RJ, Donaldson SS, Laurie F, Meyer WH, Qualman SJ, Crist WM (2004) Results of Treatment of fifty-six patients with localized retroperitoneal and pelvic rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study-IV, 1991–1997. Pediatr Blood Cancer 42:618–625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rodeberg DA, Stoner JA, Hayes-Jordan A, Kao SC, Wolden SL, Qualman SJ, Meyer WH, Hawkins DS (2009) Prognostic significance of tumor response at the end of therapy in group III rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the children’s oncology group. J Clin Oncol 27:3705–3711. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.19.5933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Seitz G, Dantonello TM, Int-Veen C, Blumenstock G, Godzinski J, Klingebiel T, Schuck A, Leuschner I, Koscielniak E, Fuchs J, CWS-96 Study Group (2011) Treatment efficiency, outcome and surgical treatment problems in patients suffering from localized embryonal bladder/prostate rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the Cooperative Soft Tissue Sarcoma trial CWS-96. Pediatr Blood Cancer 56:718–724. doi:10.1002/pbc.22950

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Arndt C, Rodeberg D, Breitfeld PP, Raney RB, Ullrich F, Donaldson S (2004) Does bladder preservation (as a surgical principle) lead to retaining bladder function in bladder/prostate rhabdomyosarcoma? Results from intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study IV. J Urol 171:2396–2403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alexander N, Lane S, Hitchcock R (2012) What is the evidence for radical surgery in the management of localized embryonal bladder/prostate rhabdomyosarcoma? Pediatr Blood Cancer 58:833–835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Raney B, Stoner J, Anderson J, Andrassy R, Arndt C, Brown K, Crist W, Maurer H, Qualman S, Wharam M, Wiener E, Meyer W, Hayes-Jordan A, Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children’s Oncology Group (2010) Impact of tumor viability at second-look procedures performed before completing treatment on the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group protocol IRS-IV, 1991–1997: a report from the children’s oncology group. J Pediatr Surg 45:2160–2168. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.07.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Merguerian PA, Agarwal S, Greenberg M, Bägli DJ, Khoury AE, McLorie GA (1998) Outcome analysis of rhabdomyosarcoma of the lower urinary tract. J Urol 160:1191–1194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yeung CK, Ward HC, Ransley PG, Duffy PG, Pritchard J (1994) Bladder and kidney function after cure of pelvic rhabdomyosarcoma in childhood. Br J Cancer 70:1000–1003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Puri DR, Wexler LH, Meyers PA, La Quaglia MP, Healey JH, Wolden SL (2006) The challenging role of radiation therapy for very young children with rhabdomyosarcoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65:1177–1184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Spunt SL, Sweeney TA, Hudson MM, Billups CA, Krasin MJ, Hester AL (2005) Late effects of pelvic rhabdomyosarcoma and its treatment in female survivors. J Clin Oncol 23:7143–7151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Breneman J, Meza J, Donaldson SS, Raney RB, Wolden S, Michalski J, Laurie F, Rodeberg DA, Meyer W, Walterhouse D, Hawkins DS (2011) Local control with reduced-dose radiotherapy for low-risk rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group D9602 study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83:720–726. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.2011

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodeberg DA, Anderson JR, Arndt CA, Ferrer FA, Raney RB, Jenney ME, Brecht IB, Koscielniak E, Carli M, Bisogno G, Oberlin O, Rey A, Ullrich F, Stevens MC, Meyer WH (2011) Comparison of outcomes based on treatment algorithms for rhabdomyosarcoma of the bladder/prostate: combined results from the Children’s Oncology Group, German Cooperative Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study, Italian Cooperative Group, and International Society of Pediatric Oncology Malignant Mesenchymal Tumors Committee. Int J Cancer 128:1232–1239. doi:10.1002/ijc.25444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ferrer FA, Isakoff M, Koyle MA (2006) Bladder/prostate rhabdomyosarcoma: past, present and future. J Urol 176:1283–1291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Macedo A Jr, Ferreira PV, Barroso U Jr, Demarchi GT, Garrone G, Liguori R, Caran E, Ortiz V (2010) Sexual function in teenagers after multimodal treatment of pelvic rhabdomyosarcoma: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Urol 6:605–608. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.06.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoro Hishiki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hishiki, T., Saito, T., Mitsunaga, T. et al. Optimal surgical treatment and urological outcomes in boys with pelvic and urogenital rhabdomyosarcomas and soft tissue sarcomas. Pediatr Surg Int 29, 1077–1082 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-013-3400-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-013-3400-y

Keywords

Navigation