In 2009, we instituted a protocol to standardize care for patients undergoing interval appendectomy based on results from a prospective trial that demonstrated a reduction in the mean number of computed tomography (CT) scans performed. The goal of this study was to determine if our current practice now resulted in fewer CT scans as a result of this trial.
A retrospective review of all patients undergoing interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis from March 2009 to March 2011 was performed. Demographics and outcomes were compared to previously collected data from a retrospective study prior to institution of the protocol and to the prospective trial.
During the study period, 45 patients underwent interval appendectomy. There were no differences in demographics among the three studies. Similar numbers of patients underwent aspiration or percutaneous drainage. There continues to be a significant reduction in the number of CT scans (3.5 ± 2.0 vs. 2.1 ± 1.3, P = 0.0001) and health care visits (7.6 ± 2.8 vs. 4.5 ± 1.4, P = 0.0001) when comparing management prior to the prospective trial to management since its completion.
A protocol for management of patients undergoing interval appendectomy care results in fewer health care visits and CT scans.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
St Peter SD, Sharp SW, Holcomb GW 3rd et al (2008) An evidence-based definition for perforated appendicitis derived from a prospective randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg 43:2242–2245
Janik JS, Ein SH, Shandling B et al (1980) Nonsurgical management of appendiceal mass in late presenting children. J Pediatr Surg 15:574–576
Chen C, Botello C, Cooper A et al (2003) Current practice patterns in the treatment of perforated appendicitis in children. J Am Coll Surg 196:212–221
Morrow SE, Newman KD (2007) Current management of appendicitis. Semin Pediatr Surg 16:34–40
Owen A, Moore O, Marven S et al (2006) Interval laparoscopic appendectomy in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 16:308–311
Weiner DZ, Katz A, Hirschl RB et al (1995) Interval appendectomy in perforated appendicitis. Pediatr Surg Int 10:82–85
St Peter SD, Aguayo P, Fraser JD et al (2010) Initial laparoscopic appendectomy versus initial nonoperative management and interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis with abscess: a prospective, randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg 45:236–240
Keckler SJ, Tsao K, Sharp SW et al (2008) Resource utilization and outcomes from percutaneous drainage and interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis with abscess. J Pediatr Surg 43:977–980
St Peter SD, Tsao K, Spilde TL et al (2008) Single daily dosing ceftriaxone and metronidazole vs standard triple antibiotic regimen for perforated appendicitis in children: a prospective randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg 43:981–985
Warner BW, Kulick RM, Stoops MM et al (1998) An evidenced-based clinical pathway for acute appendicitis decreases hospital duration and cost. J Pediatr Surg 33:1371–1375
van den Hout L, Schaible T, Cohen-Overbeek TE et al (2011) Actual outcome in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: the role of a standardized postnatal treatment protocol. Fetal Diagn Ther 29:55–63
Allen HD, Davis JT (1995) Standardizing care delivery for infants and children with common congenital cardiac lesions. Curr Opin Pediatr 7:601–605
Myers AL, Williams RF, Giles K et al (2012) Hospital cost analysis of a prospective, randomized trial of early vs interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in children. J Am Coll Surg 214:427–434
Blakely ML, Williams R, Dassinger MS et al (2011) Early vs interval appendectomy for children with perforated appendicitis. Arch Surg 146:660–665
Schurman JV, Cushing CC, Garey CL et al (2011) Quality of life assessment between laparoscopic appendectomy at presentation and interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis with abscess: analysis of a prospective randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg 46:1121–1125
Brennan GDG (2006) Pediatric appendicitis: pathophysiology and appropriate use of diagnostic imaging. CJEM 8:425–432
About this article
Cite this article
Knott, E.M., Thomas, P., Sharp, N.E. et al. Reduced use of computed tomography in patients treated with interval appendectomy after implementing a protocol from a prospective, randomized trial. Pediatr Surg Int 29, 1293–1296 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-013-3349-x
- Clinical pathway
- Resource utilization
- Computed topography