Skip to main content
Log in

Air enema reduction of intussusception: a registrar-led, protocol-driven service is safe and effective

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In the UK, air enema reduction of intussusception is predominantly performed by consultant radiologists. At our institution, it is usually performed by a team involving radiology and surgical registrars. The purpose of this study was to assess who performs air enemas in the UK and the efficacy and safety of our registrar-led service.

Methods

A telephone survey of paediatric surgical centres in the UK was performed asking who performs air enema in these institutions. Following this, a retrospective review of all air enemas at our institution between January 2005 and 2011 was performed. Cases were identified from radiology databases and reviewed for grade of radiologist, perforation and outcome.

Results

At all 25 centres, consultant radiologists performed air enemas. At our institution 145 enemas were performed in 6 years. 141 were analysed (54 girls, 87 boys). Median age was 9 months (range 3–107 months). 82 % were performed by the registrar-only team. Over 6 years the registrar-led reduction rate was 77.5 % and in the last 3 years 84 %. The perforation rate was 0.9 %.

Conclusion

A paediatric surgical registrar-led service for air enema reduction can be safe and effective ensuring a team approach is adopted, equipment is efficient and a strict protocol is applied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sorantin E, Lindbichler F (2004) Management of intussusception. Eur Radiol 14:146–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosenfeld K, McHugh K (1999) Survey of intussusception reduction in England, Scotland and Wales: how and why we could do better. Clin Radiol 54:452–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Samad L, Marven S, El Bashir H, Sutcliffe AG, Cameron JC, Lynn R, Taylor B (2012) Prospective surveillance study of the management of intussusception in UK and Irish infants. Br J Surg 99(3):411–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McHugh K (2000) Intussusception Reduction. British Society of Paediatric Radiology draft guidelines for suggested safe practice. April. http://www.bspr.org.uk/intuss.htm

  5. Okazaki T, Ogasawara Y, Nakazawa N et al (2006) Reduction of intussusception in infants by a paediatric surgical team: improvement in safety and outcome. Pediatr Surg Int 22(11):897–900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ko HS, Schenk JP, Tröger J et al (2007) Current radiological management of intussusception in children. Eur Radiol 17:2411–2421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kodikara H, Lynch A, Morreau P et al (2010) Ten-year review of intussusception at Starship Hospital: 1998–2007. N Z Med J 15(123):32–40

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stein M, Alton DJ, Daneman A (1992) Pneumatic reduction of intussusception: 5 year experience. Radiology 183:623–624

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaiser AD, Applegate KE, Ladd AP (2007) Current success in the treatment of intussusception in children. Surgery 142:469–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Appelgate K (2009) Intussusception in children; evidence based diagnosis and treatment. Padiatr Radiol 39(supple 2):S140–S143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heenan SD, Kyriou J, Fitzgerald M et al (2000) Effective dose at pneumatic reduction of paediatric intussusception. Clin Radiol 55:811–816

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lai AHM, Phua KB, Teo ELHJ et al (2002) Intussusception: a three-year review. Ann Acad Med Singapore 31:81–85

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lui KW, Wong HF, Cheung YC et al (2002) Air enema for diagnosis and reduction of intussusception in children: clinical experience and fluoroscopy time correlation. J Pediatr Surg 36:479–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin SL, Kong MS, Houng DS (2000) Decreasing early recurrence rate of acute intussusception by the use of dexamethasone. Eur J Pediatr 159:551–552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jen HC, Shew SB (2009) The impact of hospital type and experience on the operative utilization in paediatric intussusception: a nationwide study. J Pediatr Surg 44:241–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bateni C, Stein-Wexler R, Wootton-Gorges SL et al (2011) Radiology residents’ experience with intussusception reduction. Pediatr Radiol 41:721–726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stein-Wexler R, Bateni C, Wootton-Gorges SL, Li CS (2011) Paediatric radiology fellows’ experience with intussusception reduction. Pediatr Radiol 41:1365–1368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stein-Wexler R, Sanchez T, Roper GE et al (2010) An interactive teaching device simulating intussusception reduction. Pediatr Radiol 40:1810–1815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Abraham MK, Joy MG, Menon SS et al (2006) A simple and safe technique for pneumatic reduction of intussusception. Asian J Surg 29:170–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Institutional review board statement

Ethical approval was awarded to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feilim Murphy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hannon, E.J., Allan, R.A., Negus, A.S. et al. Air enema reduction of intussusception: a registrar-led, protocol-driven service is safe and effective. Pediatr Surg Int 29, 805–809 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-013-3328-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-013-3328-2

Keywords

Navigation