Skip to main content
Log in

Vaginal malformations: a proposed classification based on embryological, anatomical and clinical criteria and their surgical management (an analysis of 167 cases)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although it is virtually impossible to formulate a scheme that can satisfactorily collect all different types of vaginal malformations, a simple classification would be of a considerable value and would permit logical operative decisions. Many classifications of anomalies of uterus and vagina have been proposed: we find them unsatisfactory and confusing, being either too simple or too complex. We propose a new classification, focused only on vagina and based on embryological, anatomical, clinical and surgical criteria.

Methods

In over 30 years, 167 females with vaginal malformations have been observed in our department. Intersex cases were excluded. The encountered anomalies have been divided into six types and ten subtypes: type I vaginal agenesis (IA associated with uterine agenesis/17 Pts, IB isolated/1 Pt); type II vaginal atresia (IIA proximal/1 Pt, IIB distal/4 Pts); type III vaginal atresia with urethrovaginal fistula—urogenital sinus (IIIA proximal fistula—high sinus/42 Pts, IIIB distal fistula—low sinus/55 Pts); type IV vaginal atresia with transverse septum (IVA transverse septum/6 Pts, IVB imperforate hymen/17 Pts); type V disorders of müllerian ducts fusion (VA vaginal duplication/4 Pts, VB longitudinal septum/4 Pts); type VI cloaca/16 Pts. Of each type and subgroup of malformation the appropriate surgical correction is reported. Types of malformation and surgical treatment are analysed: IA vaginal reconstruction using a sigmoid conduit, IB vaginal reconstruction using a sigmoid conduit, atresic cervical resection and uterus-new vagina anastomosis according to Schmid; II perineal vaginal pull-through; IIIA anterior sagittal transanorectal vaginal pull-through, IIIB perineal flap vaginoplasty; IVA excision with abdominovaginal approach, IVB hymen incision; VA tubularization, VB septectomy via perineal approach; VI posterior sagittal anorectal-vaginal-urethroplasty.

Results

Most of the patients had good aesthetic and functional results. Type III showed relatively more complications: four redo operations (IIIA), four revisions of the vaginoplasty (IIIB). One patient is still waiting for definitive surgical correction.

Conclusions

An early diagnosis is desirable to correct adequately vaginal malformations, which becomes mostly evident around puberty. The better timing for surgery is early age, to obtain better results and to avoid many of the psychological problems that arise at a later age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dòmini R, Ceccarelli PL (1998) Chirurgia sostitutiva della vagina con tratti intestinali. In: Dòmini R, De Castro R (eds) “Chirurgia della malformazione urinarie e dei genitali”, Piccin Ed, Padova, 715

  2. Lima M, Ruggeri G, Randi B, Dòmini M, Gargano T, La Pergola E, Gregori G (2010) Vaginal replacement in the pediatric age group: a 34-year experience of intestinal vaginoplasty in children and young girls. J Pediatr Surg 45:2087–2091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dòmini R, Rossi F, Ceccarelli PL, De Castro R (1997) Anterior sagittal transanorectal approach to the urogenital sinus in adrenogenital syndrome: preliminary report. J Pediatr Surg 32:714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dòmini R, Rossi F (1998) Chirurgia del seno urogenitale. In: Dòmimi R, De Castro R (eds) “Chirurgia delle malformazioni urinarie e dei genitali”, Piccin Ed, Padova, 689

  5. Peña A (1992) The surgical management of persistent cloaca: results in 54 patients treated with posterior sagittal approach. J Pediatr Surg 27:681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Peña A (1997) Total urogenital mobilization: an easier way to repair cloacas. J Pediatr Surg 32:263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Monie IW, Sigurdson LA (1950) A proposed classification for uterine and vaginal anomalies. AM J Ostet Gynecol 59:698

    Google Scholar 

  8. Semmens JP (1962) Congenital anomalies of female genital tract, functional classification based on review of 56 personal cases and 500 reported cases. Obstet Gynecol 19:328

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Buttram VC Jr (1983) Müllerian anomalies and their management. Fertil Steril 40:179

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buttram VC Jr, Gibbons WE (1979) Müllerian anomalies: a proposed classification (an analisis of 144 cases). Fertil Steril 32:40

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jones HW (1981) Reproductive impairment and the malformed uterus. Fertil Steril 36:137–148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Verbaere S, Rochet Y (1983) Malformations du vagina et de l’hymen. Encycl Med Chir Paris Gynecologie A 113(10):12

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tarry WF, Duckett JW, Stephens FD (1986) The Mayer Rokitansky syndrome: pathogenesis, classification and management. J Urol 136:648

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. (1988) The American Fertility Society classification of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies, and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 49:944

  15. Tolete-Velcek F, Hansbrough F, Kugaczewski J, Coren CV, Klotz DH, Price AF, Laungani G, Kottmeier PK (1989) Utero vaginal malformations: a trap for the unsuspecting surgeon. J Pediatr Surg 24:736

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Powell DM, Newman KD, Randolph J (1995) A proposed classification of vaginal anomalies and their surgical correction. J Pediatr Surg 30(2):271–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Emans SJ, Laufer MR, Goldstein DP (1998) Pediatric and adolescent gynaecology. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  18. Oppelt P, Renner SP, Brucker S, Strissel PL, Strick R, Oppelt PG, Doerr HG, Schott GE, Hucke J, Wallwiener D et al (2005) The VCUAM (vagina, cervix uterus adnex associated malformations) classification: a new classification for genital malformations. Fertil Steril 84:1493–1497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Acién P, Acién MI (2011) The history of female genital tract malformation classifications and proposal of an updated system. Hum Reprod Update 17:693–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Ruggeri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruggeri, G., Gargano, T., Antonellini, C. et al. Vaginal malformations: a proposed classification based on embryological, anatomical and clinical criteria and their surgical management (an analysis of 167 cases). Pediatr Surg Int 28, 797–803 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-012-3121-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-012-3121-7

Keywords

Navigation