Skip to main content


Log in

Pediatric surgery telehealth: patient and clinician satisfaction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript



The Stollery Children’s Hospital serves a very large geographic region of over at least 650,000 km² with patients from outside of Edmonton accounting for approximately 50% of the service population. The aim of this study is to document the experience and opinion of the patient and clinician satisfaction with telehealth encounter for various pediatric surgical consultations and follow-up as a way to bridge the distance gap.


We observe our experience with recent telehealth implementation from 2008 to 2009. Qualitative data were collected through questionnaires aimed at patients and clinicians.


There were 259 pediatric surgical telehealth encounters, of which 37% were from outside the province. There were 42 antenatal multidisciplinary, 13 chronic pain, 103 general surgery, 2 orthopedic, 63 urology, 33 head and shape nurse practioner clinic, and 3 neurosurgery consults. 83 patient and 12 clinician questionnaires were completed. 97% of patients and 73% of clinicians reported satisfaction with having a telehealth session. 97% of the patients reside more than 200 km from the city and 77% live more than 400 km away. 48% reported a cost saving >$500–$700.


Telehealth for pediatric surgical services is an alternative as an acceptable, effective, and appropriate way to consult and follow-up pediatric patients who live in significantly remote areas with great clinician and patient satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Flewelling C, Ingram CA (2004) Telepediatrics in Canada: an overview. Telemed J E Health 10:357–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller GG, Levesque K (2002) Telehealth provides effective pediatric surgery care to remote locations. J Pediatr Surg 37:752–754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Postuma R, Loewen L (2005) Telepediatric surgery: capturing clinical outcomes. J Pediatr Surg 40:813–818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Murto K, Bryson GL, Abushahwan I et al (2008) Parents are reluctant to use technological means of communication in pediatric day care. Can J Anaesth 55:214–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sevean P, Dampier S, Spadoni M et al (2009) Patients and families experiences with video telehealth in rural/remote communities in Northern Canada. J Clin Nurs 18:2573–2579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ellis I (2004) Is telehealth the right tool for remote communities? Improving health status in rural Australia. Contemp Nurse 16:163–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gagnon MP, Duplantie J, Fortin JP et al (2007) A survey in Alberta and Quebec of the telehealth applications that physicians need. J Telemed Telecare 13:352–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zanaboni P, Scalvini S, Bernocchi P et al (2009) Teleconsultation service to improve healthcare in rural areas: acceptance, organizational impact and appropriateness. BMC Health Serv Res 9:238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Duplantie J, Gagnon MP, Fortin JP et al (2007) Telehealth and the recruitment and retention of physicians in rural and remote regions: a Delphi study. Can J Rural Med 12:30–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank the people involved in the Alberta Health Services Telesurgery Project with their technical, data gathering, and data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ioana Bratu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shivji, S., Metcalfe, P., Khan, A. et al. Pediatric surgery telehealth: patient and clinician satisfaction. Pediatr Surg Int 27, 523–526 (2011).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: