Abstract
Purpose
To determine whether surgical procedures of the lower urinary tract in patients with uropathies affect evolution of the graft in renal transplantation.
Methods
156 kidney transplantations were performed in 150 patients with end-stage renal failure due to urologic disorders. The patients were classified into three groups: A, patients who did not require surgery in the lower urinary tract; B, required surgery and preserved adequate bladder function, and C, required surgery due to vesical dysfunction.
Results
Graft survival rates at 1 year were 93.38% in group A, 95.45% in group B and 93% in group C. Rates at 5 years post-transplantation were 82.45, 79.85 and 86.58% for each group, respectively (not significant). Complications were vesicoureteral stenosis: 2 in group A, 3 in B and 1 in C; vesicoureteral reflux: 1 in group A, 1 in B and 10 in C; distal ureteral necrosis: 2 cases in group A, 2 in B and 1 in C; upper urinary tract infection: 12, 23.1 and 42.2% in each group, respectively.
Conclusion
Children with reconstructed urinary tract may be good candidates for kidney transplantation despite the higher frequency of urinary infections. Thus, careful and strict post-surgical urologic follow-up is mandatory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Koo HP, Bunchman TE, Flynn JT et al (1999) Renal transplantation in children with severe lower urinary tract dysfunction. J Urol 161:240–245
Sheldon CA, Gonzalez R, Burn MW et al (1994) Renal transplantation into the dysfunctional bladder: the role of adjunctive bladder reconstruction. J Urol 152:972
Mitchell ME, Piser JA (1987) Intestinocystoplasty and total bladder replacement in children and young adult: follow-up in 129 cases. J Urol 138:579
Broyer M, LeBihan C, Charbit M, Guest G, Tete MJ, Gagnadoux M et al (2004) Long-term social outcome of children after kidney transplantation. Transplantation 77:1033–1037
Salomon L, Fontaine E, Guest G et al (2000) Role of the bladder in delayed failure of kidney transplants in boys with posterior urethral valves. J Urol 163:1282
Shekarris B, Upadhyay J, Demirbilek S et al (2000) Surgical complications of bladder augmentation: comparison between enterocystoplasties in 133 patients. Urology 55:123
Luke P, Herz D, Bellinger M et al (2003) Long term results of pediatric renal transplantation into a dysfunctional lower urinary tract. Transplantation 76:1578–1582
Barry J (2004) Kidney transplantation into patients with abnormal bladders. Transplantation 77:1120–1123
North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study (NAPRTCS) (2007) Annual report
Nahas WC, Lucon M, Mazzucchi E, Antonopoulos IM, Piovesan AC, David Neto E et al (2004) Clinical and urodynamic evaluation after ureterocystoplasty and kidney transplantation. J Urol 171:1428
Hitchcock RJ, Duffy PG, Malone PS (1994) Ureterocystoplasty: the bladder augmentation of choice. Br J Urol 73:575
Nahas C et al (2007) Comparison of transplantation outcomes in children with and without bladder dysfunction. A customized approach equals the difference. J Urol 179:712
Taghizadeh A (2007) Renal transplantation or bladder augmentation first? A comparison of complications and outcomes in children. BJU Int 100(6):1365–1370
Franc-Guimond J, Gonzalez R (2004) Renal transplantation in children with reconstructed bladders. Transplantation 77:1116–1120
Capizzi A et al (2004) Kidney transplantation in children with reconstructed bladder. Transplantation 77:1113–1116
Riley P et al (2010) Challenges facing renal transplantation in pediatric patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction. Transplantation 89:1299–1307
Acknowledgments
The authors thank all the members of the Nephrology Department at Hospital de Pediatría Dr. Juan P. Garrahan for their collaboration.
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sager, C., Burek, C., Durán, V. et al. Outcome of renal transplant in patients with abnormal urinary tract. Pediatr Surg Int 27, 423–430 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-010-2704-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-010-2704-4