Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Management and outcome of low anorectal malformations

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Low anorectal malformation comprises about half of all anorectal anomalies. Most of the literature concerning management of anorectal anomalies is centred around the treatment and outcome of high anomalies. The management of low anomalies has been considered significantly less challenging than high anomalies. Also, the outcome of low anomalies has traditionally been considered good. However, recent more critical long-term follow-up reports show a different picture. Many patients with low anomalies suffer from long-term anorectal functional problems, especially constipation but also soiling that occurs in a significant percentage of patients. In this review, we compile the recent views on the diagnosis, surgical treatment and outcome of low anorectal anomalies. We also present an algorithm for the management of these anomalies. The emphasis on the surgical management of low anorectal anomalies is to use as minimally invasive operative methods as possible and preserve the native mechanisms of continence that usually are much better preserved than in more severe high anomalies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holschneider A, Hutson J, Pena A et al (2005) Preliminary report on the international conference for the development of standards for the treatment of anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 40:1521–1526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berdon WE, Baker DH, Santulli TV et al (1968) The radiologic evaluation of imperforate anus. An approach correlated with current surgical concepts. Radiology 90:466–471

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Narasimharao KL, Prasad GR, Katariya S (1983) Prone cross table lateral view: an alternative to the invertogram in imperforate anus. AJR 140:227–229

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Willital GH (1971) Advances in the diagnosis of anal and rectal atresia by ultrasonic-echo examination. J Pediatr Surg 6:454–457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Suomalainen A, Wester T, Koivusalo A, Rintala RJ, Pakarinen MP (2007) Congenital funnel anus in children—associated anomalies, surgical management and outcome. Pediatr Surg Int 23:1167–1170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Reisner SH, Sivan Y, Nitzan M, Merlob P (1984) Determination of anterior displacement of the anus in newborn infants and children. Pediatrics 73:216–217

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Herek O, Polat A (2004) Incidence of anterior displacement of the anus and its relationship to constipation in children. Surg Today 34:190–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pena A (1995) Anorectal malformations. Semin Pediatr Surg 4:35–47

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pakarinen MP, Goyal A, Koivusalo A, Baillie C, Turnock R, Rintala RJ (2006) Functional outcome in correction of perineal fistula in boys with anoplasty versus posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. Ped Surg Int 22:961–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rintala R, Luukkonen P, Järvinen HJ (1989) Surgical repair of vulvar anus in adults. Int J Colorectal Dis 4:244–246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pakarinen MP, Baillie C, Koivusalo A, Rintala RJ (2006) Transanal endoscopic-assisted proctoplasty—a novel surgical approach for individual management of patients with imperforate anus without fistula. J Pediatr Surg 41:314–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Javid PJ, Barnhart DC, Hirschl RB, Coran AG, Harmon CM (1998) Immediate and long-term results of surgical management of low imperforate anus in girls. J Pediatr Surg 33:198–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pakarinen MP, Koivusalo A, Lindahl H, Rintala RJ (2007) Prospective controlled long-term follow-up for functional outcome after anoplasty in boys with perineal fistula. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 44:436–439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rintala R, Lindahl H, Louhimo I (1991) Anorectal malformations—results of treatment and long term follow-up of 208 patients. Pediatr Surg Int 6:36–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hecker WC, Holschneider AM, Kraeft H et al (1980) Complications, lethality and long-term results after surgery of anorectal atresia. Z Kinderchir 29:238–244

    Google Scholar 

  16. Powell RW, Sherman JO, Raffensperger JG (1982) Megarectum: a rare omplication of imperforate anus repair and its surgical correction by endorectal pull-through. J Pediatr Surg 17:786–795

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rintala RJ, Lindahl HG, Rasanen M (1997) Do children with repaired low anorectal malformations have normal bowel function? J Pediatr Surg 32:823–826

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Trusler GA, Wilkinson RH (1962) Imperforate anus: a review of 147 cases. Can J Surg 5:269–277

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kiesewetter WB, Chang JHT (1977) Imperforate anus: a five to thirty year follow-up perspective. Prog Pediatr Surg 10:110–120

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nixon HH, Puri P (1977) The results of treatment of anorectal anomalies: a thirteen to twenty year follow-up. J Pediatr Surg 12:27–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Partridge JP, Gough MH (1961) Congenital abnormalities of the anus and rectum. Br J Surg 49:37–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Scharli AF, Kiesewetter WB (1969) Imperforate anus: anorectosigmoid pressure studies as a quantitative evaluation of postoperative continence. J Pediatr Surg 4:694–704

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yeung CK, Kiely EM (1991) Low anorectal anomalies: a critical appraisal. Pediatr Surg Int 6:333–335

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ong NT, Beasley SW (1990) Long-term functional results after perineal surgery for low anorectal anomalies. Pediatr Surg Int 5:238–240

    Google Scholar 

  25. Karkowski J, Pollock WF, Landon CW (1973) Imperforate anus. Eighteen to thirty year follow-up study. Am J Surg 126:141–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rintala R, Mildh L, Lindahl H (1992) Faecal continence and quality of life in adult patients with an operated low anorectal malformation. J Pediatr Surg 27:902–905

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Paediatric Surgery, Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Helsinki, Box 281, 00029, HUS, Finland

    Mikko P. Pakarinen & Risto J. Rintala

Authors
  1. Mikko P. Pakarinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Risto J. Rintala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikko P. Pakarinen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pakarinen, M.P., Rintala, R.J. Management and outcome of low anorectal malformations. Pediatr Surg Int 26, 1057–1063 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-010-2697-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-010-2697-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation