Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Increased incidence of negative appendectomy in childhood obesity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In recent years, there has been worldwide increase in childhood obesity. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis in very obese children can sometimes be difficult and challenging. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of histologically normal appendix in very obese and non-obese children undergoing emergency appendectomy for the clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Methods

The hospital records of 1,228 consecutive patients, who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis between 2000 and 2008, were analyzed. 207 children (16.9%) were very obese. Very obese was defined as greater than 2 standard deviations above the standardized mean weight for age. Histological data was compared between very obese and non-obese children. Seventy-seven (37%) of 207 very obese and 398 (39%) of 1,021 non-obese children had ultrasound preoperatively.

Results

The incidence of normal appendectomy was significantly higher in very obese children compared to non-obese children (24.6 vs. 9.9%, P < 0.001). The false positive rate of ultrasound was significantly higher in very obese children group compared to non-obese (26 vs. 6%, P < 0.05). The specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values of ultrasound were significantly lower (P < 0.05) in very obese children group compared to non-obese children.

Conclusion

Suspected appendicitis in childhood obesity is associated with increased incidence of normal appendectomy. Active observation in hospital in very obese children may reduce the rate of normal appendectomy without increasing the incidence of complicated appendicitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ebbeling CB, Pawlak DB, Ludwig DS (2002) Childhood obesity: public-health crisis, common sense cure. Lancet 360:473–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Puylaert JBCM (1986) Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 158:355–360

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pena BMG, Taylor GA (2000) Radiologists’ confidence in interpretation of sonography and CT in suspected pediatric appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:71–74

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosendahl K, Aukland SM, Fosse K (2004) Imaging strategies in children with suspected appendicitis. Eur Radiol 14:138–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hörmann M, Scharitzer M, Stadtler A et al (2003) Ultrasound of the appendix in children: is the child too obese? Eur Radiol 13:1428–1431

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Josephsson T, Styraud J, Eriksson S (2000) Ultrasonography in acute appendicitis. Body mass index as selection factor for US examination. Acta Radiol 41:486–488

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jones PF (2001) Ultrasonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Active observation is often sufficient to make diagnosis. BMJ 322:615–616

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Valerio G, Scalfi L, Martino C et al (2003) Comparison between different methods to assess the prevalence of obesity in sample of Italian children. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 16:211–216

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Davies D, Yanchar NL (2007) Appendicitis in the obese child. J Pediatr Surg 42:857–861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lau WY (1988) Correlation between gross appearance of the appendix at appendicectomy and histological examination. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 70:336–337

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Blair PM, Bugis PS, Turner LJ et al (1993) Review of the pathological diagnosis of 2216 appendectomy specimens. Am J Surg 165:618–620

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dahlstrom JE, MacArthur EB (1994) Enterobius vermicularis: a possible cause of symptoms resembling appendicitis. Aust NZ J Surg 64:692–694

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Paajanen H, Somppi E (1996) Early childhood appendicitis is still a difficult diagnosis. Acta Paediatr 85:459–462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dindo D, Kuller Mk, Weber M et al (2003) Obesity in general elective surgery. Lancet 361:2032–2035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vidal E, Carlin E, Driul D et al (2006) A comparison study of the prevalence of overweight and obese Italian preschool children using different reference standards. Eur J Pediatr 165:696–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Luciano A, Livieri C, Di Pietro ME et al (2003) Definition of obesity in childhood: criteria and limits. Minerva Pediatr 55:453–459

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. O`Neil JL, McCarthy SN, Burke SJ et al (2006) Prevalence of overweight and obesity in Irish school children, using four different definitions. Eur J Clin Nutr 61:743–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jones PF (1976) Active observation in management of acute abdominal pain. BMJ 2:551–553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kirby CP, Sparnon AL (2001) Active observation of children with possible appendicitis does not increase morbidity. ANZ J Surg 71:412–413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cavuşoğlu YH, Erdoğan D, Karaman A et al (2009) Do not rush into operating and just observe actively if you are not sure about the diagnosis of appendicitis. Pediatr Surg Int 25:277–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prem Puri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kutasy, B., Hunziker, M., Laxamanadass, G. et al. Increased incidence of negative appendectomy in childhood obesity. Pediatr Surg Int 26, 959–962 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-010-2646-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-010-2646-x

Keywords

Navigation