Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anal canal duplication: case reviews and summary of the world literature

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anal canal duplication (ACD) is a rare entity that is difficult to recognize. After the presentation of two patients, a review of the literature found 45 reported patients with ACD. This article presents the largest collection of known patients ACD in the literature. Of the 47 patients, 43 were female. The mean age at presentation was 28 months (range 0–24 years). The majority of the duplications were discovered incidentally (n = 21). Several presented with infectious complications such as epidural abscess with sepsis. Forty-two patients manifested an opening in the midline posterior to the native anus. Eighteen patients had associated anomalies, the majority of which were midline. Thirty-five of the patients underwent successful resection with rare complications. ACDs characteristically appear in females as incidental findings of an extra perineal orifice. They are frequently associated with additional congenital anomalies. Generally, ACDs are resectable with excellent outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Abbreviations

ACD:

Anal canal duplication.

References

  1. Tiryaki T, Senel E, Atayurt H (2006) Anal canal duplication in children: a new technique. Pediatr Surg Int 22:560–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hamada Y, Sato M, Hioki Y (1996) Anal canal duplication in childhood. Pediatr Surg Int 11:577–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Choi S, Park W (2002) Anal canal duplication in infants. J Pediatr Surg 38:758–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacquier C, Dobremez E, Piolat C (2001) Anal canal duplication in infants and children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 11(3):186–191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ochiai K, Umeda T, Murahashi O (2002) Anal-canal duplication in a 6-year-old child. Pediatr Surg Int 18:195–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ponson AE, Festern C (2001) Postanal sinus: single or different etiologies? Pediatr Surg Int 17:45–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lisi G, Illiceto M, Rossi C (2002) Anal canal duplication: a retrospective analysis of 12 cases from two European pediatric surgical departments. Pediatr Surg Int 22:967–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aaronson I (1970) Anterior sacral meningocele, anal canal duplication cyst and covered anus occurring in one family. J Pediatr Surg 5(5):559–563

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Abrami G, Dennison W (1961) Duplication of the stomach. Surgery 49:794–801

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Adachi Y, Akiyama H, Takamatsu H (1991) A case of anal duplication. J Jpn Soc Pediatr Surg 27:1241

    Google Scholar 

  11. Arai T, Miyano T, Tanno M (1990) Tubular anal duplication: experiences with two cases. Z Kinderchir 45:311–313

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ishikawa M, Watarai Y, Kabasawa Y (1994) A case of anal canal duplication. J Jpn Soc Pediatr Surg 30:1343–1347

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kratz J, Deshpande V, Ryan D (2008) Anal canal duplication associated with presacral cyst. J Pediatr Surg 43:1749–1752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ogawa T, Hasegama S, Hirai Y (1984) A neonatal case of anal canal duplication associated with congenital anal stenosis. Jpn J Pediatr Surg 16:237–241

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tagart R (1977) Congenital anal duplication: a cause of para-anal sinus. Br J Surg 64:525–528

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yatsuzuka S, Okamatsu T, Ishikawa M (1986) A case with Currarino’s triad. Jpn J Pediatr Surg 18:1627–1638

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

Authors have no financial relationships or conflicts of interests relevant to this article to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather Carpentier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carpentier, H., Maizlin, I. & Bliss, D. Anal canal duplication: case reviews and summary of the world literature. Pediatr Surg Int 25, 911–916 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-009-2474-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-009-2474-z

Keywords

Navigation