Abstract
Background
A tethered cord (TC) has been reported in as much as 50% of the patients affected by anorectal malformation (ARM). No guidelines for timing and modality of diagnosis and treatment have been established. We present the preliminary results of a multidisciplinary protocol carried out at our center.
Methods
Seventy-four ARM patients underwent spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All TC patients underwent videourodynamic (UD), somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs), and neurological examination at baseline and, if normal, at 5 and 10 years of age. Conversely, when UD or SEP abnormalities were detected the follow-up was individually tailored at shorter time.
Results
25/74 patients had a neuroradiological TC (33.7%). Based on the results of UD, SEP, and neurological status, four patients were untethered, eight are possible candidates, nine are stable, and four were excluded because of incomplete data.
Discussion
Tethered cord is frequent in ARM patients. Because neurological deficits secondary to TC can contribute to neurological disability, we recommend routine MRI examination and a multidisciplinary program of follow-up in cases of TC. Preliminary results suggest the combined use of SEPs and UD could represent a useful adjunct to clinical examination in patients in whom a “wait and see” approach is preferred to the prophylactic surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Levitt MA, Peña A (2007) Anorectal malformations. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2:1–13
McLone DG, La Marca F (1997) The tethered spinal cord: diagnosis, significance, and management. Semin Pediatr Neurol 4:192–208
Levitt MA, Patel M, Rodriguez G et al (1997) The tethered spinal cord in patients with anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 32:462–468
Carson JA, Barnes PD, Tunell WP et al (1984) Imperforate anus: the neurologic implication of sacral abnormalities. J Pediatr Surg 19:838–842
Sato S, Shirane R, Yoshimoto T (1993) Evaluation of tethered cord syndrome associated with anorectal malformations. Neurosurgery 32:1025–1027
Golonka NR, Haga LJ, Keating RP et al (2002) Routine MRI evaluation of low imperforate anus reveals unexpected high incidence of tethered spinal cord. J Pediatr Surg 7:966–969
Muthukumar N, Subramaniam B, Gnanaseelan T et al (2000) Tethered cord syndrome in children with anorectal malformations. J Neurosurg 92:626–630
Uchida K, Inoue M, Matsubara T et al (2007) Evaluation and treatment for spinal cord tethering in patients with anorectal malformation. Eur J Pediatr Surg 17:408–411
Tuuha SE, Aziz D, Drake J et al (2004) Is surgery necessary for asymptomatic tethered cord in anorectal malformation patients? J Pediatr Surg 39:773–777
Drake JM (2006) Occult tethered cord syndrome: not an indication for surgery. J Neurosurg 104:305–308
Rivosecchi M, Lucchetti MC, Zaccara A et al (1995) Spinal dysraphism detected by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with anorectal anomalies: incidence and clinical significance. J Pediatr Surg 30:488–490
Taskinen S, Valanne L, Rintala R (2002) The effect of spinal cord abnormalities on the function of the lower urinary tract in patients with anorectal abnormalities. J Urol 168:1147–1149
Warf BC, Scott RM, Barnes PD et al (1993) Tethered spinal cord in patients with anorectal and urogenital malformations. Pediatr Neurosurg 19:25–30
Suppiej A (2007) General characteristics of evoked potentials. In: Pressler R, Binnie CD, Cooper R, Robinson R (eds) Neonatal and paediatric clinical neurophysiology, 1st edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 111–154
Tortori-Donati P, Rossi A, Cama A (2000) Spinal dysraphism: a review of neuroradiological features with embryological correlations and proposal for a new classification. Neuroradiology 42:471–491
Schäfer W, Abrams P, Liao L et al (2002) International Continence Society. Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 21:261–274
Nevéus T, von Gontard A, Hoebeke P et al (2006) The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: report from the Standardisation Committee of the International Children’s Continence Society. J Urol 176:314–324
Severino M, Manara R, Faggin R et al (2008) Anorectal malformation and spinal dysraphism: the value of diffusion-weighted imaging in detecting associated intradural (epi)dermoid cyst. J Pediatr Surg 43:1935–1938
Capitanucci ML, Rivosecchi M, Silveri M et al (1995) Neurovesical dysfunction due to spinal dysraphism in anorectal anomalies. Eur J Pediatr Surg 6:159–162
Peña A (1995) Anorectal malformations. Semin Pediatr Surg 4:35–47
Selden RN (2006) Occult tethered cord syndrome: the case for surgery. J Neurosurg 104:302–304
Meyrat BJ, Vernet O, Berger D et al (1993) Pre and post-operative urodynamic and anorectal manometric findings in children operated upon for a primary tethered cord. Eur J Pediatr Surg 3:309–312
McCullough DC, Levy LM, DiChiro G, Johnson DL (1990) Toward the prediction of neurological injury from tethered spinal cord: investigation of cord motion with magnetic resonance. Pediatr Neurosurg 16:3–7
Polo A, Zanette G, Manganotti P et al (1994) Spinal somatosensory evoked potentials in patients with tethered cord syndrome. Can J Neurol Sci 21:325–330
Yamada S, Won DJ, Yamada SM (2004) Pathophysiology of tethered cord syndrome: correlation with symptomatology. Neurosurg Focus 16:E6
Boor R, Schwarz M, Reitter B, Voth D (1993) Tethered cord after spina bifida aperta: a longitudinal study of somatosensory evoked potentials. Childs Nerv Syst 9:328–330
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Suppiej, A., Dal Zotto, L., Cappellari, A. et al. Tethered cord in patients with anorectal malformation: preliminary results. Pediatr Surg Int 25, 851–855 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-009-2435-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-009-2435-6