Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tethered cord in patients with anorectal malformation: preliminary results

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A tethered cord (TC) has been reported in as much as 50% of the patients affected by anorectal malformation (ARM). No guidelines for timing and modality of diagnosis and treatment have been established. We present the preliminary results of a multidisciplinary protocol carried out at our center.

Methods

Seventy-four ARM patients underwent spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All TC patients underwent videourodynamic (UD), somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs), and neurological examination at baseline and, if normal, at 5 and 10 years of age. Conversely, when UD or SEP abnormalities were detected the follow-up was individually tailored at shorter time.

Results

25/74 patients had a neuroradiological TC (33.7%). Based on the results of UD, SEP, and neurological status, four patients were untethered, eight are possible candidates, nine are stable, and four were excluded because of incomplete data.

Discussion

Tethered cord is frequent in ARM patients. Because neurological deficits secondary to TC can contribute to neurological disability, we recommend routine MRI examination and a multidisciplinary program of follow-up in cases of TC. Preliminary results suggest the combined use of SEPs and UD could represent a useful adjunct to clinical examination in patients in whom a “wait and see” approach is preferred to the prophylactic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Levitt MA, Peña A (2007) Anorectal malformations. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McLone DG, La Marca F (1997) The tethered spinal cord: diagnosis, significance, and management. Semin Pediatr Neurol 4:192–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Levitt MA, Patel M, Rodriguez G et al (1997) The tethered spinal cord in patients with anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 32:462–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Carson JA, Barnes PD, Tunell WP et al (1984) Imperforate anus: the neurologic implication of sacral abnormalities. J Pediatr Surg 19:838–842

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sato S, Shirane R, Yoshimoto T (1993) Evaluation of tethered cord syndrome associated with anorectal malformations. Neurosurgery 32:1025–1027

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Golonka NR, Haga LJ, Keating RP et al (2002) Routine MRI evaluation of low imperforate anus reveals unexpected high incidence of tethered spinal cord. J Pediatr Surg 7:966–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Muthukumar N, Subramaniam B, Gnanaseelan T et al (2000) Tethered cord syndrome in children with anorectal malformations. J Neurosurg 92:626–630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Uchida K, Inoue M, Matsubara T et al (2007) Evaluation and treatment for spinal cord tethering in patients with anorectal malformation. Eur J Pediatr Surg 17:408–411

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tuuha SE, Aziz D, Drake J et al (2004) Is surgery necessary for asymptomatic tethered cord in anorectal malformation patients? J Pediatr Surg 39:773–777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Drake JM (2006) Occult tethered cord syndrome: not an indication for surgery. J Neurosurg 104:305–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rivosecchi M, Lucchetti MC, Zaccara A et al (1995) Spinal dysraphism detected by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with anorectal anomalies: incidence and clinical significance. J Pediatr Surg 30:488–490

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Taskinen S, Valanne L, Rintala R (2002) The effect of spinal cord abnormalities on the function of the lower urinary tract in patients with anorectal abnormalities. J Urol 168:1147–1149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Warf BC, Scott RM, Barnes PD et al (1993) Tethered spinal cord in patients with anorectal and urogenital malformations. Pediatr Neurosurg 19:25–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Suppiej A (2007) General characteristics of evoked potentials. In: Pressler R, Binnie CD, Cooper R, Robinson R (eds) Neonatal and paediatric clinical neurophysiology, 1st edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 111–154

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tortori-Donati P, Rossi A, Cama A (2000) Spinal dysraphism: a review of neuroradiological features with embryological correlations and proposal for a new classification. Neuroradiology 42:471–491

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schäfer W, Abrams P, Liao L et al (2002) International Continence Society. Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 21:261–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nevéus T, von Gontard A, Hoebeke P et al (2006) The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: report from the Standardisation Committee of the International Children’s Continence Society. J Urol 176:314–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Severino M, Manara R, Faggin R et al (2008) Anorectal malformation and spinal dysraphism: the value of diffusion-weighted imaging in detecting associated intradural (epi)dermoid cyst. J Pediatr Surg 43:1935–1938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Capitanucci ML, Rivosecchi M, Silveri M et al (1995) Neurovesical dysfunction due to spinal dysraphism in anorectal anomalies. Eur J Pediatr Surg 6:159–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Peña A (1995) Anorectal malformations. Semin Pediatr Surg 4:35–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Selden RN (2006) Occult tethered cord syndrome: the case for surgery. J Neurosurg 104:302–304

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Meyrat BJ, Vernet O, Berger D et al (1993) Pre and post-operative urodynamic and anorectal manometric findings in children operated upon for a primary tethered cord. Eur J Pediatr Surg 3:309–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McCullough DC, Levy LM, DiChiro G, Johnson DL (1990) Toward the prediction of neurological injury from tethered spinal cord: investigation of cord motion with magnetic resonance. Pediatr Neurosurg 16:3–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Polo A, Zanette G, Manganotti P et al (1994) Spinal somatosensory evoked potentials in patients with tethered cord syndrome. Can J Neurol Sci 21:325–330

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamada S, Won DJ, Yamada SM (2004) Pathophysiology of tethered cord syndrome: correlation with symptomatology. Neurosurg Focus 16:E6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Boor R, Schwarz M, Reitter B, Voth D (1993) Tethered cord after spina bifida aperta: a longitudinal study of somatosensory evoked potentials. Childs Nerv Syst 9:328–330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Midrio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suppiej, A., Dal Zotto, L., Cappellari, A. et al. Tethered cord in patients with anorectal malformation: preliminary results. Pediatr Surg Int 25, 851–855 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-009-2435-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-009-2435-6

Keywords

Navigation