Skip to main content
Log in

Management of urethrocutaneous fistula following hypospadias repair

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urethrocutaneous fistulas complicating hypospadias repair appear a common problem. There appears less data in the literature regarding the risk and management of recurrent fistulas. A retrospective review of urethrocutaneous fistulas complicating hypospadias repair was performed to evaluate their aetiology, management and outcome. Between 1993 and 2003, 1,753 patients had a hypospadias repair at our institution. Overall 123 (7%) boys developed a fistula, although detailed information was available on 117 patients only. Median age was 3.5 years at the time of fistula repair; 13% had anterior, 57% had middle and 30% had posterior hypospadias. The most common primary surgical procedure was a Durham Smith two-stage repair in 29% (n = 34), followed by a Tubularised Incised Plate urethroplasty in 19% (n = 22) and an Onlay in 14% (n = 16). Thirty-one (27%) patients developed a recurrent fistula, 9 (29%) of which recurred following a second repair. None recurred after a third repair. The risk of a recurrent fistula after an initial distal fistula repair was 12.5% and after a posterior fistula was 62% (χ2 = 15.4, P = 0.001). Use of a stent, suture type, numbers of fistula and closure attempts did not influence the recurrence rate. Undiagnosed distal obstruction was thought to be related to 27 of 117 first fistula repairs (23%) and 4 of 31 second fistula repairs (13%). The risk of recurrent urethrocutaneous fistula was increased in those boys with a posterior fistula, following a simple repair or when there was evidence of distal urethral obstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baskin LS, Duckett JW (1998) Hypospadias. In: Stringer MD, Oldham KT, Mouriquand PDE, Howard ER (eds) Pediatric surgery and urology: long term outcomes. WB Saunders Co Ltd, London, pp 559–567

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baskin LS, Ebbers MB (2006) Hypospadias: anatomy, etiology, and technique. J Pediatr Surg 41:463–472. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.11.059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Belman AB (2002) Hypospadias and chordee. In: Belman AB, King LR, Kramer SA (eds) Clinical pediatric urology. Martin Dunitz, London, pp 1061–1092

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stoll C, Alembik Y, Roth MP et al (1990) Genetic and environmental factors in hypospadias. J Med Genet 27:559–563

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pierik FH, Burdorf A, Nijman JM et al (2002) A high hypospadias rate in The Netherlands. Hum Reprod 17:1112–1115. doi:10.1093/humrep/17.4.1112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith ED (1997) The history of hypospadias. Pediatr Surg Int 12:81–85. doi:10.1007/BF01349969

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Snodgrass W (1994) Tubularized, incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias. J Urol 151:464–465

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Horton CE, Devine CJ (1973) Urethral fistula. In: Horton CE (ed) Plastic and reconstructive surgery of the genital area. Brown & Co, Boston, pp 397–403

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shapiro SR (1984) Complications of hypospadias repair. J Urol 131:518–522

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Landau EH, Gofrit ON, Meretyk S et al (2003) Outcome analysis of tunica vaginalis flap for the correction of recurrent urethrocutaneous fistula in children. J Urol 170:1596–1599. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000084661.05347.58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Holland AJA, Smith GHH, Cass DT (2000) Clinical review of the ‘Snodgrass’ hypospadias repair. Aust N Z J Surg 70:597–600. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01906.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hadidi AT (2004) Single stage versus two stage repair. In: Hadidi AT, Azmy AF (eds) Hypospadias surgery. Springer, Berlin, pp 261–267

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hadidi AT (2004) Fistula repair. In: Hadidi AT, Azmy AF (eds) Hypospadias surgery. Springer, Berlin, pp 277–282

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sunay M, Dadali M, Karabulut A et al (2007) Our 23-year experience in urethrocutaneous fistulas developing after hypospadias surgery. Urology 69:366–368. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2006.12.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Baskin LS (2006) Hypospadias. In: Stringer MD, Oldham KT, Mouriquand PDE (eds) Pediatric surgery and urology: long-term outcomes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 611–620

    Google Scholar 

  16. Snodgrass W (1994) Tubularised, incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias. J Urol 151:464–465

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Snodgrass W, Koyle M, Manzoni G et al (1996) Tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair: results of a multicenter experience. J Urol 156:839–841. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65835-X

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Park JM, Bloom DA (2006) Hypospadias repair. In: Spitz L, Coran AG (eds) Operative pediatric surgery. Hodder Arnold, London, pp 841–859

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hansson E, Becker M, Aberg M et al (2007) Analysis of complications after repair of hypospadias. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 41:120–124. doi:10.1080/02844310701228669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Waterman BJ, Renschler T, Cartwright PC et al (2002) Variables in successful repair of urethrocutaneous fistula after hypospadias surgery. J Urol 168:726–730. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64734-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Eardley I, Whitaker RH (1992) Surgery for hypospadias fistula. Br J Urol 69:306–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Horton CE, Devine CJ, Graham JK (1980) Fistulas of the penile urethra. Plast Reconstr Surg 66:407–418

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mouriquand PDE, Persad R, Sharma S (1995) Hypospadias repair: current principles and procedures. Br J Urol 76:9–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Snodgrass W (1999) Does tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair create neourethral strictures? J Urol 162:1159–1161. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(01)68110-2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Snodgrass WT, Lorenzo A (2002) Tubularized incised-plate urethroplasty for hypospadias reoperation. BJU Int 89:98–100. doi:10.1046/j.1464-410X.2002.02532.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Holland AJ, Smith GH, Ross FI et al (2001) HOSE: an objective scoring system for evaluating the results of hypospadias surgery. BJU Int 88:255–258. doi:10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02280.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. J. A. Holland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holland, A.J.A., Abubacker, M., Smith, G.H.H. et al. Management of urethrocutaneous fistula following hypospadias repair. Pediatr Surg Int 24, 1047–1051 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-008-2202-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-008-2202-0

Keywords

Navigation