Skip to main content
Log in

The clipped intestinal non-perforating anastomosis of small bowel: a new technique

  • Technical Innovation
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In contrast to adult surgery, the neonatal small intestine confronts the surgeon, depending on the age of the patient, with variable diameters of the intestine. Therefore, anastomoses are usually performed by hand with interrupted sutures. In the presented study, a new technique is demonstrated. An anastomosis in the distal ileum of Sprague Dawley rats was performed with a single clamp applicator (Anastoclip). Small bowel anastomoses were performed in 32 rats. The clipped bowel anastomosis was evaluated concerning stenosis, leakage, and adhesions in comparison to the sutured anastomosis. Tension test and X-ray examination were performed to measure the stability. The rats were sacrificed at day 3 or 14 after laparotomy. The clipped anastomosis is feasible, and faster to perform than the conventional hand-sutured anastomosis (Operation time: control group: 18.5 min versus clipped group 4 min; p > 0.05). Furthermore, there were differences in the mechanical stability, with higher tension forces needed for rupturing the clipped anastomosis. There were fewer stenoses (16.5 mm stenotic diameter in the control group versus 20.6 mm in the clipped group) and fewer adhesions in the group of the clipped anastomosis. Histological examinations were performed and did not show significant differences between the two groups. In the animal model presented, the clipped, intestinal, non-perforating anastomosis (CINPA) shows advantages compared to the common hand-sutured anastomosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith GHH, Glasson M (1989) Intestinal atresia factors affecting survival. Aust N Z J 59(2):151–156

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Connor A, Sawin RS (1998) High morbidity of enterostomy and its closure in premature infants with necrotizing enterocolitis. Arch Surg 133(8):875–880

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hedlund H, Hagberg S, Rubenson A, Sillen U (1989) Pediatr Surg Int 4(4):291–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Della Vecchia LK, Grosfeld JL, West KW, Rescorla FJ, Schere LR, Engum SA (1998) Intestinal atresia and stenosis: a 25-year experience with 277 cases. Arch Surg 133(5):490–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ade-Ajavi N, Kiely E, Drake D, Wheeler R, Spitz L (1996) Resection and primary anastomosis in necrotizing enterocolitis. J R Soc Med 89:385–388

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haberlik A, Hollwarth ME, Windhager U, Schober PH (1994) Problems of ileostomy in necrotizing enterocolitis. Acta Paediatr Suppl 396:74–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ang BK, Cheong D, Teh E, Teoh TA, Tsang C (1999) Skin stapled bowel anastomosis in a canine model. Singapore Med J 40(2):81–83

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jonsson T, Hogstrom H (1992) Effect of suture technique on early healing of intestinal anastomoses in rats. Eur J Surg 158(5):267–270

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hendriks T, Mastboom WJ (1990) Healing of experimental intestinal anastomoses. Parameters for repair. Dis Colon Rectum 33(10):891–901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bundy CA, Jacobs DM, Zera RT, Bubrick MP (1993) Comparison of bursting pressure of sutured, stapled and BAR anastomoses. Int J Colorectal Dis 8(1):1–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mansson P, Zhang XW, Jeppsson B, Thorlacius H (2002) Anastomotic healing in the rat colon: comparison between a radiological method, breaking strength and bursting pressure. Int J Colorectal Dis 17(6):420–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tirabassi MV, Banever GT, Moriarty KP, Konefal S, Reiter E, Wait R (2004) Feasibility of throcoscopic U-clip esophageal anastomosis: an alternative for esophageal atresia reconstruction. J Pediatr Surg 39(6):851–854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Inomata T, Sakita K, Ito Y, Ninomiya H, Kashiwazaki N, Sonoki S, Hisamatsu S, Nagai T (2003) A simple method for sutureless gastrointestinal anastomosis in rat. Exp Anim 52(4):345–348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Howell GP, Ryan JM, Morgans BT, Cooper GJ (1991) Assessment of the use of disposable skin staplers in bowel anastomoses to reduce laparotomy time in penetrating ballistic injury to the abdomen. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 73(2):87–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Edwards DP, Galibraith KA (1998) Colonic anastomosis in the presence of fecal peritonitis using a disposable skin stapler. J Invest Surg 11(4):267–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Holland-Cunz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holland-Cunz, S., Chmelnik, M., Roll, M. et al. The clipped intestinal non-perforating anastomosis of small bowel: a new technique. Pediatr Surg Int 23, 87–93 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-006-1803-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-006-1803-8

Keywords

Navigation