Skip to main content
Log in

High scrotal (Bianchi) single-incision orchidopexy: a “tailored” approach to the palpable undescended testis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our aim was to evaluate the utility of the high scrotal orchidopexy (Bianchi) approach for palpable undescended testis (UDT) and to assess long-term follow-up. We reviewed the records of orchidopexies performed between 1999 and 2002. The patients were then categorized by intraoperative exam under anesthesia as to whether their testes were palpable or nonpalpable. All palpable UDT that were initially thought to be amenable to a single high scrotal approach (Bianchi) were then reviewed. These cases were then analyzed to assess the impact of patient age, initial location of the testis, and prior inguinal/scrotal surgery with respect to the necessity to convert to a standard two-incision technique, and to analyze success and complications at 6–12-week and 1-year follow-up. Two hundred and nineteen orchidopexies were performed on 204 patients over this 4-year period. There were 178 testes palpable, and the transscrotal approach was used in 85 patients (100 orchidopexies). The preoperative positions of the testes that were thought to be amenable to Bianchi technique included the following: gliding (19), secondary trapped (25), superficial inguinal pouch (42), and location within the inguinal canal (2), while the remaining 12 testes were ectopic. Six patients required conversion to a traditional inguinal approach because of insufficient cord length via the single incision to allow the testis to lie in the scrotum. All patent processes vaginalis were ligated via the scrotal incision, regardless of their size. All patients, except for one who had a testis in the superficial inguinal pouch, had palpable testes of stable size and in a dependent position at 6–12-week follow-up. Of the 62 children who returned for 1-year follow-up, all had findings identical to those at their initial 6-week visits, with no atrophy or secondary reascent. Postoperative complications included transient postoperative scrotal hematoma in a single patient. The single failure underwent a successful two-incision orchidopexy for secondary reascent and a resultant trapped testis. Children with primary palpable undescended, gliding, or trapped testes can be managed successfully through the transscrotal route in the majority of cases. With use of a tailored approach to the palpable UDT, an additional groin incision is necessary only for a minority of appropriately selected cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1a–d

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schuller M (1881) On inguinal testicle and its operative treatment by transplanting into the scrotum. Ann Anat Surg 4:89–102

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bevan AD (1899) Operation on undescended testicle and congenital inguinal hernia. JAMA 33:773–777

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moul JW, Belman AB (1988) A review of surgical treatment of undescended testes with emphasis on anatomical position. J Urol 140:125–128

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Spitz L (1988) Orchidopexy. In: Spitz L, Nixon NH (eds) Rob and Smith’s operative surgery, 4th edn. Butterworths, London, pp 603–608

    Google Scholar 

  5. Scorer CG, Farrington GH (1971) Congenital deformities of testes and epididymis. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bianchi A, Squire BR (1989) Transscrotal orchidopexy: orchidopexy revised. Pediatr Surg Int 4:189–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Iyer KR, Kumar V, Huddart SN, et al. (1995) The scrotal approach. Pediatr Surg Int 10:58–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Koyle MA, Walsh R, Caruso A, et al. (1999) Scrotal (Bianchi) approach to patent processus vaginalis in children. Tech Urol 5:95–96

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jackson MB, Chilvers C, Pike MC, et al. (1986) Cryptorchidism: an apparent substantial increase since 1960. Br Med J 293:1401–1404

    Google Scholar 

  10. Berkowitz GS, Lapinsky RH, Dolgin SE, et al. (1993) Prevalence and natural history of cryptorchidism. Pediatrics 92:44–49

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ritchey ML, Bloom DA (1995) Modified dartos pouch orchidopexy. Urology 45:136–138

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Saha SK (1978) Cardopexy—a new approach to the undescended testes. Br J Urol 50:39–42

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Caruso AP, Walsh RA, Koyle MA, et al. (2000) Single scrotal incision orchidopexy for the palpable undescended testicle. J Urol 164:156–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Parsons JK, Ferrer F, Docimo SG (2003) The low scrotal approach to the ectopic or ascended testicle: prevalence of a patent processus vaginalis. J Urol 169:1832–1833

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Maizels M, Gomez F, Firlit CF (1983) Surgical correction of the failed orchidopexy. J Urol 130:955

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cartwright PC, Velagapudi S, Snyder HM, et al. (1993) A surgical approach to reoperative orchidopexy. J Urol 149:817

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hutson JM, Goh DW (1993) Can undescended testes be acquired? Lancet 341:504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Docimo SG (1995) The results of surgical therapy for cryptorchidism: a literature review and analysis. J Urol 154:1148–1152

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eardley I, Saw KC, Whitaker RH (1994) Surgical outcome of orchidopexy. II. Trapped and ascended testes. Br J Urol 73:204

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin A. Koyle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rajimwale, A., Brant, W.O. & Koyle, M.A. High scrotal (Bianchi) single-incision orchidopexy: a “tailored” approach to the palpable undescended testis. Ped Surgery Int 20, 618–622 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-004-1243-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-004-1243-2

Keywords

Navigation