Skip to main content
Log in

Supraumbilical pyloromyotomy: comparison between intracorporeal and extracorporeal approaches

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluated intracorporeal pyloromyotomy (ICP) as an alternative to extracorporeal pyloromyotomy (ECP) in infants with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. From July 1994 to June 2002, 75 patients underwent ICP, and 29 patients underwent ECP through supraumbilical incisions. The medical charts were reviewed retrospectively with regard to operating time, time to return to full feeding, complications, and outcome. The average operating time in the ICP group was significantly longer than in the ECP group (56.4±13.6 vs. 48.7±16.3 min; p=.004). However, the average time to return to full feeding in the ICP group was significantly shorter than in the ECP group (2.1±1.6 vs. 2.9±1.9 days; p=.002). Extension of the skin and/or fascial incision was necessary in two of 75 patients in the ICP group, compared with 11 of 29 patients in the ECP group (p<.0001). There were four (5.3%) wound infections and one (1.3%) mucosal perforation in the ICP group, compared with two (6.9%) wound infections in the ECP group. ICP allows patients to return to full feeding earlier than ECP does, resulting in a shorter hospital stay. ICP through a supraumbilical incision is superior to the ECP technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ohbatake M, Muraji T, Higashimoto Y, Takada K, Ogawa Y, Yamazato M, Nishijima E, Tsugawa C (1996) Supraumbilical incision for pyloromyotomy. J Jpn Soc Pediatr Surg 32:68–72

    Google Scholar 

  2. O’Keeffe FN, Stansberry SD, Swischuk LE, Hayden CK Jr. (1991) Antropyloric muscle thickness at US in infants: what is normal? Radiology 178:827–830

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fujimoto T, Lane GJ, Segawa O, Esaki S, Miyano T (1999) Laparoscopic extramucosal pyloromyotomy versus open pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: which is better? J Pediatr Surg 34:370–372

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Donnellan WL, Cobb LM (1991) Intraabdominal pyloromyotomy. J Pediatr Surg 26:174–175

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. De Caluwe D, Reding R, de Ville de Goyet J, Otte JB (1998) Intraabdominal pyloromyotomy through the umbilical route: a technical improvement. J Pediatr Surg 33:1806–1807

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tan KC, Bianchi A (1986) Circumumbilical incision for pyloromyotomy. Br J Surg 73:399

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shigeru Takamizawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takamizawa, S., Obatake, M., Muraji, T. et al. Supraumbilical pyloromyotomy: comparison between intracorporeal and extracorporeal approaches. Ped Surgery Int 20, 101–104 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-003-1096-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-003-1096-0

Keywords

Navigation