Skip to main content

Letter to the Editor

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Brolin RE, Semmlow JL, Sehonanda A, et al (1989) Comparison of five methods of assessment of intestinal viability. Surg Gynecol Obstet 168: 6–12

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Turkyilmaz Z, Sonmez K, Basaklar AC (1997) Assessment of anastomotic reliability with pulse oximetry in graded intestinal ischaemia: an experimental study in dogs. J Pediatr Surg 32: 1728–1731

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mars M, Hadley GP (1994) Failure of pulse oximetry in the assessment of raised limb intracompartmental pressure. Injury 25(6): 379–381

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Graham B, Paulus DA, Coffee HH (1986) Pulse oximetry for vascular monitoring on upper extremity replantation surgery. J Hand Surg 11(5): 687–692

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hadley, G.P., Mars, M. Letter to the Editor. Ped Surgery Int 19, 130 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-002-0769-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-002-0769-4

Keywords

  • Blood Flow
  • Pulse Oximetry
  • Bowel Wall
  • Pulsatile Flow
  • Central Oxygenation