Skip to main content
Log in

A statistical review on the optimal fingerprinting approach in climate change studies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We provide a statistical review of the “optimal fingerprinting" approach presented in Allen and Tett (Clim Dyn 15:419-434, 1999) in light of the severe criticism of McKitrick (Checking for model consistency in optimal fingerprinting: a comment. Clim Dyn 58:405–411, 2022). Our review finds that the “optimal fingerprinting" approach would survive much of McKitrick (2022)’s criticism by enforcing two conditions related to the conduct of the null simulation of the climate model, and the accuracy of the null setting climate model. The conditions we proposed are simpler and easier to verify than those in McKitrick (2022). We provide additional remarks on the residual consistency test in Allen and Tett (1999), showing that it is operational for checking the agreement between the residual covariance matrices of the null simulation and the physical internal variation under certain conditions. We further provide the reason why the Feasible Generalized Least Square method, much advocated by McKitrick (2022), is not regarded as operational by geophysicists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Allen MR, Stott PA (2003) Estimating signal amplitudes in optimal fingerprinting, part i: theory. Clim Dyn 21(5–6):477–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen M, Tett S (1999) Checking for model consistency in optimal fingerprinting. Clim Dyn 15:419–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TW (2003) An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis, 3rd edn. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai Z, Silverstein J (2010) Spectral analysis of large dimensional random matrices, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

  • Bell TL (1982) Optimal weighting of data to detect climatic change: application to the carbon dioxide problem. J Geophys Res 87:11,161-11,170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll RJ (1982) Adapting for heteroscedasticity in linear models. Ann Stat 10(4):1224–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N (1993) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley

  • Guttorp P, Gneiting T (2006) Studies in the history of probability and statistics XLIX On the Matérn correlation family. Biometrika 93(4):989–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasselmann K (1979) On the signal-to-noise problem in atmospheric response studies. In: Shawn T (ed) Meteorology of tropical oceans. Royal Meteorological Society, London, UK, pp 251–259

  • Hegerl GC, North GR (1997) Comparison of statistically optimal approaches to detecting anthropogenic climate change. J Clim 10:1125–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledoit O, Wolf M (2004) A well-conditioned estimator for large-dimensional covariance matrices. J Multivar Anal 88(2):365–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKitrick R (2022) Checking for model consistency in optimal fingerprinting: a comment. Clim Dyn 58:405–411

  • North GR, Kim KY, Shen SSP et al (1995) Detection of forced climate signals. part 1: filter theory. J Clim 8(3):401–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribes A, Planton S, Terray L (2013) Application of regularised optimal fingerprinting to attribution. part i: method, properties and idealised analysis. Clim Dyn 41(11):2817–2836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1735-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stott P, Allen M, Jones G (2003) Estimating signal amplitudes in optimal fingerprinting. part ii: application to general circulation models. Clim Dyn 21:493–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tett S, Jones G, Stott P et al (2002) Estimation of natural and anthropogenic contributions to twentieth century temperature change. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Vaart AW (1998) Asymptotic statistics. Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics, Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • White H (1980) A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48(4):817–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. The MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the reviewers of Climate Dynamics for comments and suggestions which have led to improvement in the presentation, and Hongbin Lin and Shanshan Luo for assistance.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant 12292983.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Song Xi Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, H., Chen, S.X. & Mu, M. A statistical review on the optimal fingerprinting approach in climate change studies. Clim Dyn 62, 1439–1446 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06975-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06975-5

Keywords

Navigation