Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Control of Storminess over the Pacific and North America by Circulation Regimes

The role of large-scale dynamics in weather extremes

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Circulation regimes are identified from a cluster analysis applied to 5-day means of the combined anomalies of 500 hPa geopotential height and the 250 hPa zonal wind over the extended Pacific-North America region obtained from ERA-Interim reanalyses. Five regimes are identified: the Arctic Low (AL), Pacific wavetrain (WT), Alaskan Ridge (AR) and Pacific Trough (PT) and Arctic High (AH). Regime dependent anomalies of the frequency of atmospheric rivers and measures of the storm tracks (850 hPa covariance between high pass filtered meridional wind and temperature and 300 hPa variance of high pass filtered meridional wind) are shown to be significant. The circulation regimes provide statistically significant modulation of observed precipitation (obtained from the Multi-Source Weighted-Ensemble data set). We examine regime-specific anomalies, normalized anomalies and the occurrence of extreme values of precipitation. We identify regions in which the ratio of frequency of occurrence of extremes (5th and 95th percentile) to the climatological frequency in each regime is significantly high. Precipitation is decreased over the Pacific Northwest in the AL regime, but is increased over the central and Eastern US, with a large increase in the probability of extreme precipitation, enhanced atmospheric river occurrence and stronger storm tracks. In the WT regime, Pacific atmospheric rivers are shifted towards Alaska, accompanied by a decrease in storm track magnitude over the Eastern North Pacific. The AR regime is characterized by an increase in moisture flux into the Southwest, increases in extreme precipitation and atmospheric rivers and storm track related heat transport. Increases in precipitation, and atmospheric rivers along the Southwest coast are noted in the PT regime, along with increased precipitation over Texas and Florida. The Northeastern region experiences increases in extremely dry conditions. Significant drought conditions occur over the Midwest US. Significant increases in precipitation over a broad region of the Northwest occur during the AH regime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agel L, Barlow M, Feldstein SB, Gutowski WJ (2017) Identification of large-scale meteorological patterns associated with extreme precipitation in the US northeast. Clim Dyn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3724-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnston AG, Livezey RE (1987) Classification, seasonality and persistence of low-frequency atmospheric circulation patterns. Mon Weather Rev 115:1083–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter SE, Nigam S (2015) Key role of the North Pacific oscillation–West Pacific pattern in generating the extreme 2013/14 north American winter. J Clim 28:8109–8117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck HE, Dijk AV, Levizzani V, Schellekens J, Miralles DG, Martens B, de Roo A (2017) MSWEP 3-hourly 0.25 degree global gridded precipitation (1979–2015) by merging gauge, satellite, and reanalysis data. Hydrol Earth Sci 21:589–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmon ML (1976) A climatological spectral study of the 500 mb geopotential height of the northern hemisphere. J Atmos Sci 33:1607–1623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassou C (2008) Intraseasonal interaction between the Madden–Julian Oscillation and the North Atlantic Oscillation. Nature 455:523–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen M, Shi W, Xie P, Silva VBS, Kousky VE, Higgins RW, Janowiak JE (2008) Assessing objective techniques for gauge-based analyses of global daily precipitation. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009132

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng X, Wallace JM (1993) Cluster analysis of the Northern hemisphere wintertime 500-hpa heigh field: spatial patterns. J Atmos Sci 50:2674–2796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen B (2007) Atmospheric circulation regimes: can cluster analysis provide the number? J Clim 20:2229–2250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JSM, Rogers JC (2007) A synoptic climatology of the central United States and associations with Pacific teleconnection pattern frequency. J Clim 20:3485–3497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corti S, Molteni F, Palmer TN (1999) Signature of recent climate change in frequencies of natural atmospheric circulation regimes. Nature 398:799–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson A, Palmer TN (2014) Simulating weather regimes: impact of model resolution and stochastic parameterization. Clim Dyn 44:2177–2193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deday E, Simon JC (1976) Clustering analysis. In: Fu K (ed) Communication and cybernetics 10 digital pattern recognition. Springer, Berlin, pp 47–94

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dee DP et al (2011) The ERA-interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137:553–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFlorio MJ, Pierce DW, Cayan DR, Miller AJ (2013) Western US extreme precipitation events and their relation to ENSO and PDO in CCSM4. J Clim 26:4231–4243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFlorio MJ, Waliser DE, Guan B, Lavers DA, Vitart FMRF (2018) Global assessment of atmospheric river skill. J Hydrometeorol 19:409–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desbois M, Seze G, Swejwach G (1982) Automatic classification of cloudfs on METEOSAT imagery: application to high-level clouds. J Appl Meteorol 21:401–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein SB, Dayan U (2008) Circumglobal teleconnections and wave packets associated with Israeli winter precipitation. Q J R Meteorol Soc 134:435–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferranti L, Corti S (2011) New clustering products. ECMWF Newsl 127:6–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferranti L, Corti S, Janousek M (2015) Flow-dependent verification of the ECMWF ensemble over the Euro-Atlantic sector. Q J R Meteorol Soc 141:916–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frame THA, Ambaum MP, Gray SL, Methven J (2011) Ensemble prediction of transitions of the North Atlantic eddy-drive jet. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137:1288–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannchi A, Straus DM, Franzke CLE, Corti S, Woollings T (2017) Low-frequency nonlinearity and regime behavior in the Northern Hemisphere extra-tropical atmosphere. Rev Geophys 55:199–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itoh H, Kimoto M (1996) Multiple attractors and chaotic itinerancy in a quasi-geostrophic model with realistic topography: implications for weather regimes and low frequency variability. J Atmos Sci 53:2217–2231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itoh H, Kimoto M (1997) Chaotic itinerancy with preferred transition routes appearing in an atmospheric model. Phys D 109:274–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James PM (2006) An assessment of European synoptic variability in Hadley Centre Global Environmental models based on an objective classification of weather regimes. Clim Dyn 27:215–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins GM, Watts DG (1968) Spectral analysis and its applications. Holden-Day, San Francisco, p 525

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones PW (1999) First- and second-order conservative remapping schemes for grids in spherical coordinates. Mon Weather Rev 127:2204–2210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimoto M, Ghil M (1993a) Multiple flow regimes in the Northern Hemisphere winter. Part I: Methodology and hemispheric regimes. J Atmos Sci 50:2625–2643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimoto M, Ghil M (1993b) Multiple flow regimes in the Northern Hemisphere winter. Part II: Sectorial regimes and preferred transitions. J Atmos Sci 50:2645–2673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin H, Brunet G, Derome J (2009) An observed connection between the North Atlantic Oscillation and the Madden–Julian Oscillation. J Clim 22:364–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linkin ME, Nigam S (2008) The North Pacific oscillation-West Pacific teleconnection pattern: mature-phase structure and winter impacts. J Clim 21:1979–1997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelangeli PA, Vautard R, Legras B (1995) Weather regimes: reccurrence and quasi-stationarity. J Atmos Sci 52:1237–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mo KC, Ghil M (1988) Cluster analysis of multiple planetary flow regimes. Geophys Res 93D:10,927–10,952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molteni F, Tibaldi S (1990) Regimes in the wintertime circulation over the northern extratropics. II: Consequences for dynamical predictability. Q J R Meteorol Soc 116:1263–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munoz AG, Yang X, Vecchi GA, Robertson AW, Cooke WF (2017) A weather-type-based cross-time-scale diagnostic framework for coupled circulation models. J Clim 30:8951–8972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park TW, Ho CH, Deng Y (2014) A synoptic and dynamical characterization of wave-train and blocking cold surge over East Asia. Clim Dyn 43:753–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralph FM, Neiman PJ, Wick GA (2004) Satellite and caljet aircraft observations of atmospheric rivers over the eastern North Pacific Ocean during the winter of 1997/98. Mon Weather Rev 132:1721–1745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhold BB, Pierrehumbert RT (1982) Dynamics of weather regimes: quasi-stationary waves and blocking. Mon Weather Rev 110:1105–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riddle EE, Stone MB, Johnson NC, L’Heureux ML, Collins DC, Feldstein SB (2013) The impact of the MJO on clusters of wintertime circulation anomalies over the North American region. Clim Dyn 40:1741–1766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson AW, Ghil M (1999) Large-scale weather regimes and local climate over the western United States. J Clim 12:1796–1813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson AW, Kushnir Y, Lall U, Nakamura J (2015) Weather and climatic drivers of extreme flooding events over the midwest of the United States. In: Chafez M, Ghil M, Urrutia-Fucugauchi J (eds) Extreme events: observations, modeling, and economics. Wiley, Oxford, pp 115–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Roller CD, Qian JH, Agel L, Barlow M, Moron V (2016) Winter weather regimes in the Northeast United States. J Clim 29:2963–2980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryoo JM, Kaspi Y, Waugh DW, Kiladis GN, Waliser DE, Fetzer EJ, Kim JJ (2013) Impact of rossby wave breaking on us west coast winter precipitation during ENSO events. J Clim 26:6360–6382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons AJ, Hoskins BJ (1978) The life cycles of some nonlinear baroclinic waves. J Atmos Sci 35:414–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus DM (1983) On the role of the seasonal cycle. J Atmos Sci 40:303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus DM (2010) Synoptic-eddy feedbacks and circulation regime analysis. Mon Weather Rev 138:4026–4034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus DM, Molteni F (2004) Flow regimes, and SST forcing, and climate noise: results from large GCM ensembles. J Clim 17:1641–1656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus DM, Shukla J (2002) Does ENSO force the PNA? J Clim 15:2340–2358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus DM, Corti S, Molteni F (2007) Circulation regimes: chaotic variability versus SST-forced predictability. J Clim 20:2251–2272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swales D, Alexander M, Hughes M (2016) Examining moisture pathways and extreme precipitation in the US intermountain west using self-organizing maps. Geophys Res Lett 43:1727–1735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toth Z (1993) Preferred and unpreferred circulation types in the northern hemisphere wintertime phase space. J Atmos Sci 50:2868–2888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vautard R, Legras B (1981) On the source of low-frequency variability. PartII: Nonlinear equilibration of weather regimes. J Atmos Sci 45:2485–2467

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace JM, Gutzler DG (1981) Teleconnections in the geopotential height field during the northern hemisphere winter. Mon Weather Rev 109:784–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise EK, Wrzesien ML, Dannengerg MP, McGinnis DL (2015) Cool-season precipitation patterns associated with teleconnection interactions in the United States. J App Meteorol Climatol 54:494–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie Z, Black RX, Deng Y (2017) The structure and large-scale organization of extreme cold waves over the conterminous United States. Clim Dyn 29:4075–4088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao S, Deng Y, Black RX (2017) A dynamical and statistical characterization of US extreme precipitation events and their associated large-scale meteorological patterns. J Clim 30:1307–1326

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Office of Naval Research under Award N00014-21-1-0449. DMS was also supported by NSF Grant AGS-1338427, NOAA Grant NA14OAR4310160, and NASA Grant NNX14AM19G.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Straus.

Appendix: Clustering details

Appendix: Clustering details

1.1 Algorithm

Let S be the sum of squared distances between each state (expressed in PC space) and the centroid of the cluster to which it is assigned. Let the cluster separation \(\varDelta\) be the sum of squared distances of each cluster centroid about the origin, weighted by the cluster population. Since one can easily show that \((N-1) \sigma ^{2} = S + \varDelta\), where N is the number of states and \(\sigma ^{2}\) the variance of all N points (which is fixed for the given data set), maximizing the ratio \(R = \varDelta /S\) is equivalent to minimizing S.

The iterative algorithm to seek the minimum of S is initiated by randomly identifying k initial points called seeds, whose coordinates form the first estimate of the cluster centroids. Each of the N points in the data set is then assigned to the seed to which it is closest, so that k groups (clusters) are formed. Each of the k centroids (average coordinates) are then recomputed based on all members in that cluster, and with this new definition of the centroids, the cluster assignments are recomputed. This iterative process of re-defining clusters proceeds until S has converged to what is assumed to be a minimum within the set of all possible choices of k clusters. Following a method suggested by Molteni (personal communication) one can ensure more rapid convergence by choosing the k seed points so that they are truly representative of the entire set of points. In PC space, this is accomplished by ensuring that each seed has a norm less than a maximum value in the full PC space, that each pair of seeds has a minimum distance from each other, and that each pair of seeds belongs to a different sector in the plane of the leading two PCs.

1.2 Synthetic time series for PCs

The temporal correlation structure of any time series can be captured in a synthetic time series by computing the Fourier harmonic coefficients of the original time series for all frequencies, retaining the original amplitudes, but randomizing the phases for each frequency. This random-phase approach (Christiansen 2007) preserves the spectrum. Since (for an infinite time series) the spectrum is the Fourier transform of the temporal autocovariance function (Jenkins and Watts 1968), the synthetic time series should retain the original temporal correlation information.This approach needs to be modified when applied to daily data for many winters, thus to discontinuous segments: the random-phase calculation is applied to the time series of seasonal means, and separately to the deviations of the daily data from those seasonal means. Finally the two synthetic time series are added (Straus 2010). Figure 16 shows the auto-covariance function of the original leading PC (in black curves) from the reanalysis and the results from the random-phase method (blue curve).

Fig. 16
figure 16

Lagged Autocovariance of leading Principle component of the reanalysis data (black lines) and average over 100 simulations of the synthetic PC stochastic process (blue line). The red lines indicate plus and minus one standard deviation limits from the stochstic process

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amini, S., Straus, D.M. Control of Storminess over the Pacific and North America by Circulation Regimes. Clim Dyn 52, 4749–4770 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4409-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4409-7

Keywords

Navigation