Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Convergence behavior of idealized convection-resolving simulations of summertime deep moist convection over land

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Convection-resolving models (CRMs) can explicitly simulate deep convection and resolve interactions between convective updrafts. They are thus increasingly used in numerous weather and climate applications. However, the truncation of the continuous energy cascade at scales of \(\mathcal {O}\)(1 km) poses a serious challenge, as in kilometer-scale simulations the size and properties of the simulated convective cells are often determined by the horizontal grid spacing (\(\Delta x\)).In this study, idealized simulations of deep moist convection over land are performed to assess the convergence behavior of a CRM at \(\Delta x =\) 8, 4, 2, 1 km and 500 m. Two types of convergence estimates are investigated: bulk convergence addressing domain-averaged and integrated variables related to the water and energy budgets, and structural convergence addressing the statistics and scales of individual clouds and updrafts. Results show that bulk convergence generally begins at \(\Delta x =4\) km, while structural convergence is not yet fully achieved at the kilometer scale, despite some evidence that the resolution sensitivity of updraft velocities and convective mass fluxes decreases at finer resolution. In particular, at finer grid spacings the maximum updraft velocity generally increases, and the size of the smallest clouds is mostly determined by \(\Delta x\). A number of different experiments are conducted, and it is found that the presence of orography and environmental vertical wind shear yields more energetic structures at scales much larger than \(\Delta x\), sometimes reducing the resolution sensitivity. Overall the results lend support to the use of kilometer-scale resolutions in CRMs, despite the inability of these models to fully resolve the associated cloud field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldauf M, Seifert A, Förstner J, Majewski D, Raschendorfer M, Reinhardt T (2011) Operational convective-scale numerical weather prediction with the cosmo model: description and sensitivities. Mon Weather Rev 139(12):3887–3905

    Google Scholar 

  • Ban N, Schmidli J, Schär C (2014) Evaluation of the convection-resolving regional climate modeling approach in decade-long simulations. J Geophys Res Atmos 119(13):7889–7907

    Google Scholar 

  • Banta RM (1984) Daytime boundary-layer evolution over mountainous terrain. Part I: Observations of the dry circulations. Mon Weather Rev 112(2):340–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Banta RM (1990) The role of mountain flows in making clouds. Atmos Proc Over Complex Terrain Meteorol Monogr 23(45):229–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthlott C, Burton R, Kirshbaum D, Hanley K, Richard E, Chaboureau JP, Trentmann J, Kern B, Bauer HS, Schwitalla T et al (2011) Initiation of deep convection at marginal instability in an ensemble of mesoscale models: a case-study from cops. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137(S1):118–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackadar AK (1962) The vertical distribution of wind and turbulent exchange in a neutral atmosphere. J Geophys Res 67(8):3095–3102

    Google Scholar 

  • Böing SJ, Jonker HJ, Siebesma AP, Grabowski WW (2012) Influence of the subcloud layer on the development of a deep convective ensemble. J Atmos Sci 69(9):2682–2698

    Google Scholar 

  • Bott A (1989) A positive definite advection scheme obtained by nonlinear renormalization of the advective fluxes. Mon Weather Rev 117(5):1006–1016

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockhaus P, Lüthi D, Schär C (2008) Aspects of the diurnal cycle in a regional climate model. Meteorol Zeit 17(4):433–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau P, Seity Y, Ricard D, Léger J (2016) Improvement of the forecast of convective activity from the arome-france system. Q J R Meteorol Soc 142(699):2231–2243

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan GH, Morrison H (2012) Sensitivity of a simulated squall line to horizontal resolution and parameterization of microphysics. Mon Weather Rev 140(1):202–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan GH, Wyngaard JC, Fritsch JM (2003) Resolution requirements for the simulation of deep moist convection. Mon Weather Rev 131(10):2394–2416

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig GC, Dörnbrack A (2008) Entrainment in cumulus clouds: what resolution is cloud-resolving? J Atmos Sci 65(12):3978–3988

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai A, Trenberth KE (2004) The diurnal cycle and its depiction in the Community Climate System Model. J Clim 17(5):930–951

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauhut T, Chaboureau JP, Escobar J, Mascart P (2015) Large-eddy simulations of hector the convector making the stratosphere wetter. Atmos Sci Lett 16(2):135–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Done J, Davis CA, Weisman M (2004) The next generation of NWP: explicit forecasts of convection using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. Atmos Sci Lett 5(6):110–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Frei C, Schär C (1998) A precipitation climatology of the alps from high-resolution rain-gauge observations. Int J Climatol 18(8):873–900

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski WW (2001) Coupling cloud processes with the large-scale dynamics using the cloud-resolving convection parameterization (crcp). J Atmos Sci 58(9):978–997

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski W, Bechtold P, Cheng A, Forbes R, Halliwell C, Khairoutdinov M, Lang S, Nasuno T, Petch J, Tao WK et al (2006) Daytime convective development over land: a model intercomparison based on LBA observations. Q J R Meteorol Soc 132(615):317–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley KE, Plant RS, Stein TH, Hogan RJ, Nicol JC, Lean HW, Halliwell C, Clark PA (2015) Mixing-length controls on high-resolution simulations of convective storms. Q J R Meteorol Soc 141(686):272–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassanzadeh H, Schmidli J, Langhans W, Schlemmer L, Schär C (2015) Impact of topography on the diurnal cycle of summertime moist convection in idealized simulations. Meteorol Zeit

  • Heise E, Lange M, Ritter B, Schrodin R (2003) Improvement and validation of the multi-layer soil model. COSMO Newsl 3:198–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohenegger C, Brockhaus P, Schär C (2008) Towards climate simulations at cloud-resolving scales. Meteorol Zeit 17(4):383–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohenegger C, Schlemmer L, Silvers L (2015) Coupling of convection and circulation at various resolutions. Tellus A 67:26678

    Google Scholar 

  • Houze R (1993) Cloud dynamics. Academic, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendon EJ, Roberts NM, Senior CA, Roberts MJ (2012) Realism of rainfall in a very high-resolution regional climate model. J Clim 25(17):5791–5806

    Google Scholar 

  • Khairoutdinov M, Randall D (2006) High-resolution simulation of shallow-to-deep convection transition over land. J Atmos Sci 63(12):3421–3436

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirshbaum DJ (2011) Cloud-resolving simulations of deep convection over a heated mountain. J Atmos Sci 68(2):361–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirshbaum D, Grant A (2012) Invigoration of cumulus cloud fields by mesoscale ascent. Q J R Meteorol Soc 138(669):2136–2150

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemp JB, Wilhelmson RB (1978) The simulation of three-dimensional convective storm dynamics. J Atmos Sci 35(6):1070–1096

    Google Scholar 

  • Langhans W, Fuhrer O, Schmidli J (2012a) Description and application of a budget-diagnosis tool in COSMO. COSMO Newsl 12:43–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Langhans W, Fuhrer O, Schmidli J (2012b) Description and application of a budget-diagnosis tool in COSMO. COSMO Newsl 12:43–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Langhans W, Schmidli J, Schär C (2012c) Bulk convergence of cloud-resolving simulations of moist convection over complex terrain. J Atmos Sci 69(7):2207–2228

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapillonne X, Fuhrer O, Spörri P, Osuna C, Walser A, Arteaga A, Gysi T, Rüdisühli S, Osterried K, Schulthess T (2016) Operational numerical weather prediction on a gpu-accelerated cluster supercomputer. EGU Gen Assembly Conf Abstr 18:13554

    Google Scholar 

  • Lean HW, Clark PA, Dixon M, Roberts NM, Fitch A, Forbes R, Halliwell C (2008) Characteristics of high-resolution versions of the Met Office Unified Model for forecasting convection over the United Kingdom. Mon Weather Rev 136(9):3408–3424

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuenberger D, Koller M, Fuhrer O, Schär C (2010) A generalization of the SLEVE vertical coordinate. Mon Weather Rev 138(9):3683–3689

    Google Scholar 

  • Leutwyler D, Fuhrer O, Lapillonne X, Lüthi D, Schär C (2016) Towards european-scale convection-resolving climate simulations with GPUS: a study with cosmo 419. Geosci Modell Dev 9(9):3393

    Google Scholar 

  • Leutwyler D, Lüthi D, Ban N, Fuhrer O, Schär C (2017) Evaluation of the convection-resolving climate modeling approach on continental scales. J Geophys Res Atmos 122(10):5237–5258

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis JF (1979) A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere. Bound Layer Meteorol 17(2):187–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlam FH (1980) Clouds and storms: the behavior and effect of water in the atmosphere. Pennsylvania State University Press, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor GL, Yamada T (1974) A hierarchy of turbulence closure models for planetary boundary layers. J Atmos Sci 31(7):1791–1806

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor GL, Yamada T (1982) Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev Geophys 20(4):851–875

    Google Scholar 

  • Panosetti D, Böing S, Schlemmer L, Schmidli J (2016) Idealized large-eddy and convection-resolving simulations of moist convection over mountainous terrain. J Atmos Sci 73(10):4021–4041

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope SB (2000) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambrigde

    Google Scholar 

  • Prein AF, Langhans W, Fosser G, Ferrone A, Ban N, Goergen K, Keller M, Tölle M, Gutjahr O, Feser F et al (2015) A review on regional convection-permitting climate modeling: demonstrations, prospects, and challenges. Rev Geophys 53(2):323–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Prein AF, Rasmussen RM, Ikeda K, Liu C, Clark MP, Holland GJ (2017) The future intensification of hourly precipitation extremes. Nat Clim Chang 7(1):48–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall D, Khairoutdinov M, Arakawa A, Grabowski W (2003) Breaking the cloud parameterization deadlock. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 84(11):1547–1564

    Google Scholar 

  • Raschendorfer M (2001) The new turbulence parameterization of LM. COSMO Newsl 1:89–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt T, Seifert A (2006) A three-category ice scheme for LMK. COSMO Newsl 6:115–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricard D, Lac C, Riette S, Legrand R, Mary A (2013) Kinetic energy spectra characteristics of two convection-permitting limited-area models arome and meso-nh. Q J R Meteorol Soc 139(674):1327–1341

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter B, Geleyn JF (1992) A comprehensive radiation scheme for numerical weather prediction models with potential applications in climate simulations. Mon Weather Rev 120(2):303–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockel B, Will A, Hense A (2008) The Regional Climate Model COSMO-CLM (CCLM). Meteorol Zeit 17(4):347–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Schär C, Leuenberger D, Fuhrer O, Lüthi D, Girard C (2002) A new terrain-following vertical coordinate formulation for atmospheric prediction models. Mon Weather Rev 130(10):2459–2480

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlemmer L, Hohenegger C (2014) The formation of wider and deeper clouds as a result of cold-pool dynamics. J Atmos Sci 71(8):2842–2858

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlemmer L, Hohenegger C, Schmidli J, Bretherton CS, Schär C (2011) An idealized cloud-resolving framework for the study of midlatitude diurnal convection over land. J Atmos Sci 68(5):1041–1057

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz CS, Kain JS, Weiss SJ, Xue M, Bright DR, Kong F, Thomas KW, Levit JJ, Coniglio MC (2009) Next-day convection-allowing WRF model guidance: a second look at 2-km versus 4-km grid spacing. Mon Weather Rev 137(10):3351–3372

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang Y, Lean HW, Bornemann J (2013) The benefits of the met office variable resolution NWP model for forecasting convection. Meteorol Appl 20(4):417–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Verrelle A, Ricard D, Lac C (2015) Sensitivity of high-resolution idealized simulations of thunderstorms to horizontal resolution and turbulence parametrization. Q J R Meteorol Soc 141(687):433–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisman ML, Klemp JB (1982) The dependence of numerically simulated convective storms on vertical wind shear and buoyancy. Mont Weather Rev 110(6):504–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisman ML, Skamarock WC, Klemp JB (1997) The resolution dependence of explicitly modeled convective systems. Mon Weather Rev 125(4):527–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisman ML, Davis C, Wang W, Manning KW, Klemp JB (2008) Experiences with 0–36-h explicit convective forecasts with the wrf-arw model. Weather Forecast 23(3):407–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicker LJ, Skamarock WC (2002) Time-splitting methods for elastic models using forward time schemes. Mon Weather Rev 130(8):2088–2097

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyngaard JC (2004) Toward numerical modeling in the terra incognita. J Atmos Sci 61(14):1816–1826

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou B, Simon JS, Chow FK (2014) The convective boundary layer in the terra incognita. J Atmos Sci 71(7):2545–2563

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding for all the authors was provided by the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich (ETH Zurich) and the Center for Climate Systems Modeling (C2SM) through the convection-resolving climate modeling on future supercomputing platforms (crCLIM) project. The numerical simulations have been performed on the Cray XC30 (Piz Daint) at the Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CSCS). The authors acknowledge PRACE for awarding access to Piz Daint at CSCS. Access to the COSMO-Model was kindly provided by the Consortium for Small-Scale Modeling. The authors thank Daniel Lüthi for the technical support and Wolfgang Langhans for the helpful discussions. The authors are also thankful to two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and recommendations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davide Panosetti.

Additional information

This paper is a contribution to the special issue on Advances in Convection-Permitting Climate Modeling, consisting of papers that focus on the evaluation, climate change assessment, and feedback processes in kilometer-scale simulations and observations. The special issue is coordinated by Christopher L. Castro, Justin R. Minder, and Andreas F. Prein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Panosetti, D., Schlemmer, L. & Schär, C. Convergence behavior of idealized convection-resolving simulations of summertime deep moist convection over land. Clim Dyn 55, 215–234 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4229-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4229-9

Keywords

Navigation