Causes of skill in seasonal predictions of the Arctic Oscillation



Based on an analysis of hindcasts from a seasonal forecast system, complemented by the analysis of a large ensemble of AMIP simulations, possible causes for skillful prediction of the winter Arctic Oscillation (AO) on a seasonal time-scale are analyzed. The possibility that the recent increase in AO skill could be due to model improvements, or due to changes in the persistence characteristics of the AO, is first discounted. The analysis then focuses on exploring the possibility that the recent increase in prediction skill in AO may be due to sampling variations or could have physical causes. Temporal variations in AO skill due entirely to sampling alone cannot be discounted as this is a fundamental constraint on verifications over a short time-series. This notion is supported from theoretical considerations, and from the analysis of the temporal variations in the perfect model skill where substantial variations in skill due to sampling alone are documented. As for the physical causes, the analysis indicates possible links in the prediction skill of AO with the SST forcing from the tropics, particularly related to the SST variations associated with the Trans-Niño Index (TNI). Interannual and low frequency variations in the TNI could have contributed to similar temporal variations in AO skill. For example, a dominance of central Pacific El Niño events after 2000 (a reflection of low-frequency variations in TNI) coincided with an increase in the prediction skill of AO. The analysis approach and results provide an avenue for further investigations; for example, model simulations forced with the SST pattern associated with the TNI, to establish or reaffirm causes for AO skill.



We would like to thank Michelle L'Heureux, Peitao Peng and two anonymous reviewers for providing insightful comments that led to improvements in the final version of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

382_2017_4019_MOESM1_ESM.docx (239 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 239 KB)


  1. Alexander MA, Blade I, Newman M, Lanzante JR, Lau N-C, Scott JD (2002) The Atmospheric bridge: the influence of ENSO teleconnections on Air–Sea interaction over the Global Oceans. J Clim 15:2205–2231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashok K, Behera SK, Rao SA, Weng H, Yamagata T (2007) El Niño Modoki and its possible teleconnection. J Geophys Res Oceans 112:C11007. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnston AG, Chelliah M, Goldengerg SB (1997) Documentation of a highly ENSO-related SST region in the equatorial Pacific. Atmos Ocean 35:367–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bretherton CS, Battisti DS (2000) An interpretation of the results from atmospheric general circulation models forced by the time history of the observed sea surface temperature distribution. Geophys Res Lett 27:767–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butler A et al (2016) The Climate-system Historical Forecast Project: do stratosphere-resolving models make better seasonal climate predictions in boreal winter? Q J R Meteorol Soc 142:1413–1427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunstone N, Smith D, Scaife A, Hermanson L, Eade R, Robinson N, Andrews M, Kight J (2016) Skilful predictions of the winter North Atlantic Oscillation one year ahead. Nat Geosci 9:809–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eade R, Smith D, Scaife E, Wallace N, Dunstone L, Hermanson, Robinson N (2014) Do seasonal-to-decadal climate predictions under-estimate the predictability of the real world? Geophys Res Lett 41:5620–5628. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feldstein SB (2000) The timescale, power spectra, and climate noise properties of teleconnection patterns. J Clim 13:4430–4440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guan C, McPhaden MJ (2016) Ocean process affecting the twenty-first-century shift in ENSO SST variability. J Clim 29:6861–6879. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoerling MP, Kumar A, Zhong M (1997) El Niño, La Nia and the nonlinearity of their teleconnections. J Clim 10:1769–1786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hu Z-Z, Kumar A, Hunag B, Xue Y, Wang W, Jha B (2011) Persistent atmospheric anomalies in the North Atlantic from summer 2009-summer 2010. J Clim 24:-5812–5830Google Scholar
  12. Janowiak JE, Xie P (1999) CAMS-OPI: A global satellite-rain gauge merged product for real time precipitation monitoring application. J Clim 12:3335–3342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kalnay E et al (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kang D et al (2014) Prediction of the Arctic Oscillation in boreal winter by dynamical seasonal forecast systems. Geophys Res Lett 41:3577–3585. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kirtman B, Pirani A (2009) The state of the art of seasonal prediction—Outcomes and recommendations from the first World Climate Research Program workshop on seasonal prediction. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. Google Scholar
  16. Kumar A (2009) Finite sample and uncertainty estimates for skill measures for seasonal prediction. Mon Wea Rev 137:2622–2631. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kumar A, Hoerling MP (2000) Analysis of a conceptual model of seasonal climate variability and implications for seasonal predictions. Bull Am Meteor Soc 81:255–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumar A, Wang H (2015) On the potential of extratropical SST anomalies for improving climate predictions. Clim Dyn 44:2557–2569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kumar A, Peng P, Chen M (2014a) Is there a relationship between potential and actual shill? Mon Wea Rev 142:2220–2227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kumar A, Jha B, Wang H (2014b) Attribution of SST variability in global Oceans and the role of ENSO. Clim Dyn 43:209–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kushnir Y, Robinson WA, Chang P, Robertson AW (2006) The physical basis for predicting Atlantic sector seasonal-to-interannual climate variability. J Clim 19:5949–5970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lau N-C (1981) A diagnostic study of recurrent meteorological anomalies appearing in a 15-year simulation with a GFDL general circulation mode. Mon Wea Rev 109:2287–2311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee T, McPhaden MJ (2010) Increasing intensity of El Niño in the central-equatorial Pacifc. Geophys Res Lett 37:L14603. Google Scholar
  24. Limpasuvan V, Hartmann DL (1999) Eddies and the annular modes of climate variability. Geophys Res Lett 26:3133–3136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mantua NJ, Hare SR, Zhang Y, Wallace JM, Francis RC (1997) A Pacific interdecadal climate oscillation with impacts on salmon production. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 78:1069–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mehta VM, Suarez MJ, Manganello JV, Delworth TL (2000) Oceanic influence on the North Atlantic Oscillation and associated northern hemisphere climate variations: 1959–1993. Geophys Res Lett 27:121–124. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. National Research Council (2010) Assessment of intraseasonal to interannual climate prediction and predictability, pp 192. National Academies Press, Washington, DC (ISBN-10:0–309-15183-X)Google Scholar
  28. Rayner NA, Parker DE, Horton EB, Folland CK, Alexander LV, Rowell DP, Kent EC, Kaplan A (2003) Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J Geophys Res 108:2–1. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reynolds WR, Rayner NA, Smith TM, Stokes DC, Wang W (2002) An improved in situ and satellite SST analysis for climate. J Clim 15:1609–1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Riddle EE, Butler AH, Furtado JC, Cohen JL, Kumar A (2013) CFSv2 ensemble prediction of the wintertime Arctic Oscillation. Clim Dyn 41:1099–1116. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Robertson AW (2001) Influence of ocean-atmosphere interaction on the Arctic Oscillation in two general circulation models. J Clim 14:3240–3254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Robertson AW, Mechoso CR, Kim Y-J (2000) The influence of Atlantic sea surface temperature anomalies on the North Atlantic Oscillation. J Clim 13:122–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rodwell MJ, Rowell DP, Folland CK (1999) Oceanic forcing of the winter North Atlantic Oscillation and European climate. Nature 398:320–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Saha S et al (2010) The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 91:1015–1057. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Saha S et al (2014) The NCEP climate forecast system version 2. J Clim 27:2185–2208. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Scaife AA et al (2014) Skillful long-range prediction of European and North American winters. Geophys Res Lett 41:2514–2519. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scaife AA et al (2017) Tropical rainfall, Rossby waves and regional winter climate predictions. Q J R Meteorol Soc. Google Scholar
  38. Shi W, Schaller N, MacLeod D, Palmer TN, Weisheimer A (2015) Impact of hindcast length on estimates of seasonal climate predictability. Geophys Res Lett 42:1554–1559. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stockdale T, Molteni F, Ferranti L (2015) Atmospheric initial conditions and predictability of the Arctic Oscillation. Geophys Res Lett 42:1173–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Trenberth KE, Stepaniak DP (2001) Indices of El Niño evolution. J Clim 14:1697–1701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Trenberth EK, Branstrator GW, Karoly D, Kumar A, Lau N-C, Ropelewski C (1998) Progress during TOGA in understanding and modeling global teleconnections associated with tropical sea surface temperatures. J Geophys Res 107(C7):14291–14324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Watanabe M, Kimoto M (1999) Tropical-extratropical connection in the Atlantic atmosphere-ocean variability. Geophys Res Lett 26:2247–2250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weisheimer A, Schaller N, O’Reilly C, MacLeod DA, Palmer TN (2017) Atmospheric seasonal forecasts of the twentieth century: multi-decadal variability in predictive skill of the winter North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and their potential value for extreme event attribution. Q J R Meteorol Soc 143:917–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wen C, Kumar A, Xue Y (2014) Factors contributing to uncertainty in Pacific Decadal Oscillation index. Geophys Res Lett 41:7980–7986. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang W, Wang L, Xiang B, Qi L, He J (2015) Impacts of two types of La Niña on the NAO during boreal winter. Clim Dyn 44:1351–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature (outside the USA) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Climate Prediction CenterNCEP/NWS/NOAACollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations