Downscaling RCP8.5 daily temperatures and precipitation in Ontario using localized ensemble optimal interpolation (EnOI) and bias correction

  • Ziwang Deng
  • Jinliang Liu
  • Xin Qiu
  • Xiaolan Zhou
  • Huaiping Zhu
Article

Abstract

A novel method for daily temperature and precipitation downscaling is proposed in this study which combines the Ensemble Optimal Interpolation (EnOI) and bias correction techniques. For downscaling temperature, the day to day seasonal cycle of high resolution temperature of the NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis (CFSR) is used as background state. An enlarged ensemble of daily temperature anomaly relative to this seasonal cycle and information from global climate models (GCMs) are used to construct a gain matrix for each calendar day. Consequently, the relationship between large and local-scale processes represented by the gain matrix will change accordingly. The gain matrix contains information of realistic spatial correlation of temperature between different CFSR grid points, between CFSR grid points and GCM grid points, and between different GCM grid points. Therefore, this downscaling method keeps spatial consistency and reflects the interaction between local geographic and atmospheric conditions. Maximum and minimum temperatures are downscaled using the same method. For precipitation, because of the non-Gaussianity issue, a logarithmic transformation is used to daily total precipitation prior to conducting downscaling. Cross validation and independent data validation are used to evaluate this algorithm. Finally, data from a 29-member ensemble of phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) GCMs are downscaled to CFSR grid points in Ontario for the period from 1981 to 2100. The results show that this method is capable of generating high resolution details without changing large scale characteristics. It results in much lower absolute errors in local scale details at most grid points than simple spatial downscaling methods. Biases in the downscaled data inherited from GCMs are corrected with a linear method for temperatures and distribution mapping for precipitation. The downscaled ensemble projects significant warming with amplitudes of 3.9 and 6.5 °C for 2050s and 2080s relative to 1990s in Ontario, respectively; Cooling degree days and hot days will significantly increase over southern Ontario and heating degree days and cold days will significantly decrease in northern Ontario. Annual total precipitation will increase over Ontario and heavy precipitation events will increase as well. These results are consistent with conclusions in many other studies in the literature.

Keywords

Downscaling Ensemble optimal interpolation Ontario Localization CMIP5 Daily temperature Daily precipitation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Ontario Ministry of Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) for its financial support to this study, although the content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the MOECC. We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions.

References

  1. Akinyemi FO, Adejuwon JO (2008) A GIS-based procedure for downscaling climate data for West Africa. Trans GIS 12(5):613–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong L (2015) Mapping and modeling weather and climate with GIS. Esri Press, RedlandsGoogle Scholar
  3. Baigorria GA, Jones JW, O’Brien JJ (2007) Understanding rainfall spatial variability in southeast USA at different timescales. Int J Climatol 27(6):749–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benestad RE (2005). Climate change scenarios for northern Europe from multi-model IPCC AR4 climate simulations. Geophys Res Lett 32(17)Google Scholar
  5. Braun M, Klaas T, Vieira E, Eng P (2015) Manitoba-minnesota transmission project historic and future clima te studyGoogle Scholar
  6. Carrega P (ed) (2013) Geographical information and climatology. WileyGoogle Scholar
  7. Casanova S, Ahrens B (2009) On the weighting of multimodel ensembles in seasonal and short-range weather forecasting. Mon Weather Rev 137:3811–3822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chadwick P, Hume B (2009) Weather of Ontario. Lone Pine Publishing, UK, pp 112–141Google Scholar
  9. Cheng CS, Campbell M, Li Q, Li G, Auld H, Day N, Comer N et al (2008a). Differential and combined impacts of extreme temperatures and air pollution on human mortality in south–central Canada. Part I: historical analysis. Air Qual Atmos Health 1(4):209–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng CS, Campbell M, Li Q, Li G, Auld H, Day N, Comer N et al (2008b) Differential and combined impacts of extreme temperatures and air pollution on human mortality in south–central Canada. Part II: future estimates. Air Qual Atmos Health 1(4):223–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiotti Q, Lavender B (2008) In: Lemmen DS, Warren FJ, Lacroix J, Bush E (eds) Ontario; in from impacts to adaptation: Canada in a Changing Climate 2007. Government of Canada, Ottawa, pp 227–274Google Scholar
  12. Cubasch U, Wuebbles D, Chen D, Facchini MC, Frame D, Mahowald N, Winther J-G (2013) Introduction.Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. In: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, Qin T.F., D., Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Dee D, National Center for Atmospheric Research Staff (eds) (2015) Last modified 05 Aug 2015. The climate data guide: ERA-Interim. https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data/era-interim. https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data/era-interim#sthash.47AH4fWr.dpuf
  14. Dee DP et al. (2011) The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137:553–597. doi: 10.1002/qj.828 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deng Z, Tang Y, Wang G (2010) Assimilation of Argo temperature and salinity profiles using a bias-aware localized EnKF system for the Pacific Ocean. Ocean Modell 35:187–205. doi: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2010.07.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deng Z, Tang Y, Freeland HJ (2011) Evaluation of several model error schemes in the EnKF assimilation: applied to Argo profiles in the Pacific Ocean. J Geophys Res Oceans (1978–2012) 116(C9). doi: 10.1029/2011JC006942
  17. Deng Z, Tang Y, Chen D, Wang G (2012) A time-averaged covariance method in the EnKF for Argo data assimilation. Atmos Ocean 50(sup1):129–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deng Z, Qiu X, Liu J, Madras N, Wang X, Zhu H (2016) Trend in frequency of extreme precipitation events over Ontario from ensembles of multiple GCMs. Climate Dyn 46(9–10):2909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Environment Canada (1998) Atmospheric environment service, climate research branch. Climate Trends and Variations Bulletin for Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  20. Environment Canada (2012) Canadian climate normals 1981–2010Google Scholar
  21. Evensen G (2003) The ensemble Kalman filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation. Ocean Dyn 53(4):343–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fang G, Yang J, Chen YN, Zammit C (2015) Comparing bias correction methods in downscaling meteorological variables for a hydrologic impact study in an arid area in China. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 19(6):2547–2559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Field CB, Barros VR, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Abdrabo MK, Adger N, Burkett VR et al (2014) Summary for policymakers. Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part a: global and sectoral aspects. In: Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, pp 1–32Google Scholar
  24. Flato G, Marotzke J, Abiodun B, Braconnot P, Chou S, Collins W et al (2013) Evaluation of climate models. In: Stocker TF et al (eds) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 741–866Google Scholar
  25. Gao L, Schulz K, Bernhardt M (2014) Statistical downscaling of ERA-interim forecast precipitation data in complex terrain using LASSO algorithm. Adv Meteorol 2014Google Scholar
  26. Gaspari G, Cohn SE (1999) Construction of correlation functions in two and three dimensions. Q J R Meteorolog Soc 125(554):723–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gutiérrez JM, San-Martín D, Brands S, Manzanas R, Herrera S (2013) Reassessing statistical downscaling techniques for their robust application under climate change conditions. J Clim 26(1):171–188Google Scholar
  28. Gutmann E, Pruitt T, Clark MP, Brekke L, Arnold JR, Raff DA, Rasmussen RM (2014) An intercomparison of statistical downscaling methods used for water resource assessments in the United States. Water Res Res 50(9):7167–7186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hall A (2014) Projecting regional change. Science 346(6216):1461–1462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hopson TM (2014) Assessing the ensemble spread–error relationship. Mon Weather Rev 142(3):1125–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hou AY, Zhang SQ, Reale O (2004) Variational continuous assimilation of TMI and SSM/I rain rates: impact on GEOS-3 hurricane analyses and forecasts. Mon Weather Rev 132(8):2094–2109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jarraud M (2008) Guide to meteorological instruments and methods of observation (WMO-No. 8). World Meteorological Organisation, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  33. Kalnay E (2003) Atmospheric modeling, data assimilation and predictability. Cambridge University Press, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  34. Katz RW (2010) Statistics of extremes in climate change. Clim Change 100:71–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kirchmeier MC, Lorenz DJ, Vimont DJ (2014) Statistical downscaling of daily wind speed variations. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 53(3):660–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Knutti R, Abramowitz G, Collins M, Eyring V, Gleckler PJ, Hewitson B, Mearns L (2010) Good practice guidance paper on assessing and combining multi model climate projections. In: Qin TFD, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Midgley PM (eds) Meeting report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Expert Meeting on Assessing and Combining Multi Model Climate Projections Stocker. IPCC Working Group I Technical Support Unit, University of Bern, BernGoogle Scholar
  37. Kohavi R (1995) A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. Ijcai 14(2):1137–1145Google Scholar
  38. Law M, Collins A (2013) Getting to know ArcGIS for desktop. Esri Press, RedlandsGoogle Scholar
  39. Lenderink G, Buishand A, Deursen WV (2007) Estimates of future discharges of the river Rhine using two scenario methodologies: direct versus delta approach. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11(3):1145–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Li Z, Zheng FL, Liu WZ, Jiang DJ (2012) Spatially downscaling GCMs outputs to project changes in extreme precipitation and temperature events on the Loess Plateau of China during the 21st Century. Global Planet Change 82:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lien G, Kalnay E, Miyoshi T, Huffman GJ (2012) Effective assimilation of global precipitation. In: AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts (vol 1, p 0096)Google Scholar
  42. Lien GY, Kalnay E, Miyoshi T, Huffman GJ (2015) Statistical properties of global precipitation in the NCEP GFS model and TMPA observations for data assimilation. Mon Weather Rev (2015)Google Scholar
  43. Lopez P (2011) Direct 4D-Var assimilation of NCEP stage IV radar and gauge precipitation data at ECMWF. Mon Weather Rev 139(7):2098–2116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mach K, Mastrandrea M (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. In: Field CB, Barros VR (eds) vol 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Mandal S, Simonovic SP (2017) Quantification of uncertainty in the assessment of future streamflow under changing climate conditions. Hydrol Processes 31(11):2076–2094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Maurer EP, Hidalgo HG (2007) Utility of daily vs. monthly large-scale climate data: an intercomparison of two statistical downscaling methods. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 12:551–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McLaughlin JF, Hellmann JJ, Boggs CL, Ehrlich PR (2002) Climate change hastens population extinctions. Proc Nat Acad Sci 99(9):6070–6074Google Scholar
  48. Mesinger F, DiMego G, Kalnay E, Shafran P, Ebisuzaki W, Jovic D, Fan Y et al (2004) NCEP North American regional reanalysis. Am Meteorol SocGoogle Scholar
  49. Moss RH, Edmonds JA, Hibbard KA, Manning MR, Rose SK, Van Vuuren DP, Meehl GA et al (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463(7282):747–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. NCEP-DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2), Kanamitsu M, Ebisuzaki W, Woollen J, Yang S-K, Hnilo JJ, Fiorino M, Potter GL (2002) 1631–1643, Bull Atmos Met SocGoogle Scholar
  51. Ning L, Riddle EE, Bradley RS (2015) Projected changes in climate extremes over the Northeastern United States. J Climate 28:3289–3310. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00150.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Oke PR, Schiller A, Griffin DA, Brassington GB (2005) Ensemble data assimilation for an eddy-resolving ocean model of the Australian region. Q J R Meteorolog Soc 131(613):3301–3311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pimpler E (2013) Programming ArcGIS 10.1 with Python Cookbook. Packt Publishing Ltd, BirminghamGoogle Scholar
  54. Qi P, Cao L (2015) Establishment and tests of EnOI assimilation module for WAVEWATCH III. Chin J Oceanol Limnol 33:1295–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rana A, Moradkhani H (2015) Spatial, temporal and frequency based climate change assessment in Columbia River Basin using multi downscaled-Scenarios. Climate Dyn 1–22Google Scholar
  56. Saha S et al (2010) The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 91:1015–1057. doi:  10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Saha S et al (2013) The NCEP climate forecast system version 2. J Clim doi:  10.1175/JCLI.-D-12-00823.1 (early online release)Google Scholar
  58. Sakov P, Sandery PA (2015) Comparison of EnOI and EnKF regional ocean reanalysis systems. Ocean Model 89:45–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schmidli J, Frei C, Vidale PL (2006) Downscaling from GCM precipitation: a benchmark for dynamical and statistical downscaling methods. Int J Climatol 26:679–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schmidli J, Goodess CM, Frei C, Haylock MR, Hundecha Y, Ribalaygua J, Schmith T (2007) Statistical and dynamical downscaling of precipitation: an evaluation and comparison of scenarios for the European Alps. J Geophys Res Atmos 112:(D4). doi: 10.1029/2005JD007026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schoof JT (2015) High-resolution projections of 21st century daily precipitation for the contiguous US. J Geophys Res Atmos 120(8):3029–3042Google Scholar
  62. Srinivasan A, Chassignet EP, Bertino L, Brankart JM, Brasseurg P, Chin TM, Counillon F, Cummings JA, Mariano AJ, Smedstad OM, Thacker WC (2011) A Comparison of sequential assimilation schemes for ocean prediction with the HYbrid coordinate ocean model (HYCOM): twin experiments with static forecast error covariances. Ocean Modell 37(3–4):85–111Google Scholar
  63. Szeto KK (2008) On the extreme variability and change of cold-season temperatures in Northwest Canada. J Climate 21:94–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Terink W, Hurkmans RTWL, Torfs PJJF, Uijlenhoet R (2010) Evaluation of a bias correction method applied to downscaled precipitation and temperature reanalysis data for the Rhine basin. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14:687–703. doi: 10.5194/hess-14-687-2010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Teutschbein C, Seibert J (2012) Bias correction of regional climate model simulations for hydrological climate-change impact studies: review and evaluation of different methods. J Hydrol 456:12–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Waggoner PE (1989) Anticipating the frequency distribution of precipitation if climate change alters its mean. Agri For Meteorol 47(2–4):321–337Google Scholar
  67. Wang W et al (2011) An assessment of the surface climate in the NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Clim Dyn 37:1601–1620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wang X, Huang G, Liu J, Li Z, Zhao S (2015) Ensemble projections of regional climatic changes over Ontario. Canada J Climate 28(18):7327–7346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Watterson IG (2005) Simulated changes due to global warming in the variability of precipitation, and their interpretation using a gamma-distributed stochastic model. Adv Water Resour 28(12):1368–1381Google Scholar
  70. Werner AT (2011) BCSD downscaled transient climate projections for eight select GCMs over British Columbia, Canada. Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium. University of Victoria, Victoria, p 63Google Scholar
  71. Wood AW, Maurer EP, Kumar A, Lettenmaier DP (2002) Long-range experimental hydrologic forecasting for the eastern United States. J Geophys Res 107:1–15Google Scholar
  72. Wood AW, Leung LR, Sridhar V, Lettenmaier DP (2004) Hydrologic implications of dynamical and statistical approaches to downscaling climate model outputs. Clim Change 62:189–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ziwang Deng
    • 1
  • Jinliang Liu
    • 2
  • Xin Qiu
    • 3
  • Xiaolan Zhou
    • 1
  • Huaiping Zhu
    • 1
  1. 1.Lamps, Department of Mathematics and StatisticsYork UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of Earth and Space Science and EngineeringYork UniversityTorontoCanada
  3. 3.NOVUS EnvironmentalGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations