How to reduce long-term drift in present-day and deep-time simulations?
Climate models are often affected by long-term drift that is revealed by the evolution of global variables such as the ocean temperature or the surface air temperature. This spurious trend reduces the fidelity to initial conditions and has a great influence on the equilibrium climate after long simulation times. Useful insight on the nature of the climate drift can be obtained using two global metrics, i.e. the energy imbalance at the top of the atmosphere and at the ocean surface. The former is an indicator of the limitations within a given climate model, at the level of both numerical implementation and physical parameterisations, while the latter is an indicator of the goodness of the tuning procedure. Using the MIT general circulation model, we construct different configurations with various degree of complexity (i.e. different parameterisations for the bulk cloud albedo, inclusion or not of friction heating, different bathymetry configurations) to which we apply the same tuning procedure in order to obtain control runs for fixed external forcing where the climate drift is minimised. We find that the interplay between tuning procedure and different configurations of the same climate model provides crucial information on the stability of the control runs and on the goodness of a given parameterisation. This approach is particularly relevant for constructing good-quality control runs of the geological past where huge uncertainties are found in both initial and boundary conditions. We will focus on robust results that can be generally applied to other climate models.
KeywordsTuning Energy budget GCM Paleoclimate
The computations were performed at University of Geneva on the Baobab and CLIMDAL3 clusters. We thank Jean-Michel Campin, Marjorie Perroud and Martin Beniston for useful discussions, and the MITgcm-support mailing list for valuable advice on the code. This work was partly supported by CTI 15574.1 PFES-ES.
- Braconnot P, Harrison SP, Otto-Bliesner B, Abe-Ouchi A, Jungclaus J, Peterschmitt JY (2011) The paleoclimate modeling intercomparison project contribution to CMIP5. CLIVAR Exch No 56(16):15–19Google Scholar
- Hansen J, Sato M, Kharecha P, von Schuckmann K (2011) Earth’s energy imbalance and implications. Atmos Chem Phys 11:13,421–13,449. doi:10.5194/acp-11-13421-2011Google Scholar
- Irvine PJ, Gregoire LJ, Lunt DJ, Valdes PJ (2013) An efficient method to generate a perturbed parameter ensemble of a fully coupled aogcm without flux-adjustment. Geosci Model Devel 6:1447–1462. doi: 10.5194/gmd-6-1447-2013
- Levitus S, Boyer T (1994) World ocean atlas 1994. Temperature, vol 4. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Levitus S, Burgett R, Boyer T (1994) World ocean atlas 1994. Salinity, vol 3. U. S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Lunt DJ, Huber M, Anagnostou E, Baatsen MLJ, Caballero R, DeConto R, Dijkstra HA, Donnadieu Y, Evans D, Feng R, Foster GL, Gasson E, von der Heydt AS, Hollis CJ, Inglis GN, Jones SM, Kiehl J, Kirtland Turner S, Korty RL, Kozdon R, Krishnan S, Ladant JB, Langebroek P, Lear CH, LeGrande AN, Littler K, Markwick P, Otto-Bliesner B, Pearson P, Poulsen CJ, Salzmann U, Shields C, Snell K, Stärz M, Super J, Tabor C, Tierney JE, Tourte GJL, Tripati A, Upchurch GR, Wade BS, Wing SL, Winguth AME, Wright NM, Zachos JC, Zeebe RE (2017) The DeepMIP contribution to PMIP4: experimental design for model simulations of the EECO, PETM, and pre-PETM (version 1.0). Geosci Model Dev 10:889–901. doi: 10.5194/gmd-10-889-2017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- National Research Council (2011) Understanding earth’s deep past: lessons for our climate future. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. doi: 10.17226/13111