Mean-state dependence of ENSO atmospheric feedbacks in climate models
- 279 Downloads
We investigate the dependence of ENSO atmospheric feedbacks on the mean-state in a perturbed atmospheric physics ensemble with the Kiel Climate Model (KCM) and in CMIP5 models. Additionally, uncoupled simulations are conducted with the atmospheric component of the KCM to obtain further insight into the mean-state dependence. It is found that the positive zonal wind feedback and the negative heat flux feedback, with the short-wave flux as dominant component, are strongly linearly related through sea surface temperature (SST) and differences in model physics are less important. In observations, strong zonal wind and heat flux feedbacks are caused by a convective response in the western central equatorial Pacific (Niño4 region), resulting from an eastward (westward) shift of the rising branch of the Walker Circulation (WC) during El Niño (La Niña). Many state-of-the-art climate models exhibit an equatorial cold SST bias in the Niño4 region, i.e. are in a La Niña-like mean-state. Therefore they simulate a too westward located rising branch of the WC (by up to 30°) and only a weak convective response. Thus, the position of the WC determines the strength of both the amplifying wind and usually damping heat flux feedback, which also explains why biases in these two feedbacks partly compensate in many climate models. Furthermore, too weak atmospheric feedbacks can cause quite different ENSO dynamics than observed, while enhanced atmospheric feedbacks lead to a substantial improvement of important ENSO properties such as seasonal ENSO phase locking and asymmetry between El Niño and La Niña. Differences in the mean-state SST are suggested to be a major source of ENSO diversity in current climate models.
We acknowledge the World Climate Research Program’s Working Group on Coupled Modeling, the individual modeling groups of the Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP3 and CMIP5), the UK Met Office, ECMWF, NOAA, ISCCP and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution for providing the data sets. The climate model integrations of the KCM and ECHAM5 were performed at the Computing Centre of Kiel University. This work was supported by the SFB 754 “Climate-Biochemistry Interactions in the tropical Ocean”, the European Union’s InterDec project, the ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science (Grant CE110001028), the ARC project “Beyond the linear dynamics of the El Niño Southern Oscillation” (Grant DP120101442). This is a contribution to the Cluster of Excellence “The Future Ocean” at the University of Kiel.
- Dommenget D, Yu Y (2016) the seasonally changing cloud feedbacks contribution to the ENSO seasonal phase-locking. Clim Dyn., 1–12, doi: 10.1007/s00382-016-3034-6
- Madec G (2008) NEMO ocean engine. Note du Pole modélisation 27, Inst. Pierre-Simon Laplace, p 193Google Scholar
- Madec G, Delecluse P, Imbard M, Lévy C (1998) OPA 8.1 ocean general circulation model manual. Note du Pole modélisation 11, Inst. Pierre-Simon Laplace, p 91Google Scholar
- Meehl GA et al (2007a) Global Climate Projections. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 747–846Google Scholar
- Philander S (1990) El Niño, La Niña, and the southern oscillation. Academic Press, San Diego, p 293Google Scholar
- Roeckner E et al (2003) The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM5. PART I: model description, Report 349. Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, p 140Google Scholar
- Simmons A, Uppala S, Dee D, Kobayashi S (2007) ERA-Interim: new ECMWF reanalysis products from 1989 onwards. ECMWF Newsl 110:25–35Google Scholar
- Stocker T, Qin D, Plattner G, Tignor M, Allen S (2013) IPCC 2013: climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 1535Google Scholar
- Wang C, Picaut J (2004) Understanding ENSO physics—a review. Earth’s Climate, American Geophysical Union, New York, pp 21–48Google Scholar
- Wang C, Deser C, Yu J (2012) El Niño and Southern Oscillation (ENSO): a review. Coral Reefs Eastern PacificGoogle Scholar
- Yu B, Zwiers FW (2010) Changes in equatorial atmospheric zonal circulations in recent decades. Geophys Res Lett 37:L05701Google Scholar