Abstract
Decadal climate predictions, which are initialized with observed conditions, are characterized by two main sources of uncertainties—internal and model variabilities. Using an ensemble of climate model simulations from the CMIP5 decadal experiments, we quantified the total uncertainty associated with these predictions and the relative importance of each source. Annual and monthly averages of the surface temperature and zonal wind were considered. We show that different definitions of the anomaly result in different conclusions regarding the variance of the ensemble members. However, some features of the uncertainty are common to all the measures we considered. We found that on decadal time scales, there is no considerable increase in the uncertainty with time. The model variability is more sensitive to the annual cycle than the internal variability. This, in turn, results in a maximal uncertainty during the winter in the northern hemisphere. The uncertainty of the surface temperature prediction is dominated by the model variability, whereas the uncertainty of the zonal wind is determined by both sources. An analysis of the spatial distribution of the uncertainty reveals that the surface temperature has higher variability over land and in high latitudes, whereas the surface zonal wind has higher variability over the ocean. The relative importance of the internal and model variabilities depends on the averaging period, the definition of the anomaly, and the location. The model uncertainties that contribute greatly to the total uncertainties in most regions, for all the variables considered here, may be reduced by weighting the models in the ensemble.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blázquez J, Nuñez MN (2013) Analysis of uncertainties in future climate projections for South America: comparison of WCRP-CMIP3 and WCRP-CMIP5 models. Clim Dynam 41(3–4):1039–1056. doi:10.1007/s00382-012-1489-7
Branstator G, Teng H (2012) Potential impact of initialization on decadal predictions as assessed for CMIP5 models. Geophys Res Lett 39(12):L12,703, doi:10.1029/2012GL051974
Bruyère CL, Done JM, Holland GJ, Fredrick S (2014) Bias corrections of global models for regional climate simulations of high-impact weather. Clim Dynam 43(7–8):1847–1856. doi:10.1007/s00382-013-2011-6
Cox P, Stephenson D (2007) A changing climate for prediction. Science 317(5835):207–208. doi:10.1126/science.1145956
Crétat J, Pohl B, Richard Y, Drobinski P (2012) Uncertainties in simulating regional climate of Southern Africa: sensitivity to physical parameterizations using WRF. Clim Dynam 38(3–4):613–634. doi:10.1007/s00382-011-1055-8
Deser C, Phillips AS, Alexander MA, Smoliak BV (2014) Projecting North American climate over the next 50 years: uncertainty due to internal variability. J Clim 27(6):2271–2296. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00451.1
Doblas-Reyes FJ, Andreu-Burillo I, Chikamoto Y, Garcia-Serrano J, Guemas V, Kimoto M, Mochizuki T, Rodrigues LRL, van Oldenborgh GJ (2013) Initialized near-term regional climate change prediction. Nat Commun 4:1715
de Elía R, Caya D, Côté H, Frigon A, Biner S, Giguère M, Paquin D, Harvey R, Plummer D (2008) Evaluation of uncertainties in the CRCM-simulated North American climate. Clim Dynam 30(2–3):113–132. doi:10.1007/s00382-007-0288-z
Friedlingstein P, Meinshausen M, Arora VK, Jones CD, Anav A, Liddicoat SK, Knutti R (2014) Uncertainties in cmip5 climate projections due to carbon cycle feedbacks. J Clim 27:511–526. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00579.1
Giorgi F, Francisco R (2000a) Evaluating uncertainties in the prediction of regional climate change. Geophys Res Lett 27(9):1295–1298. doi:10.1029/1999GL011016
Giorgi F, Francisco R (2000b) Uncertainties in regional climate change prediction: a regional analysis of ensemble simulations with the HADCM2 coupled AOGCM. Clim Dynam 16(2–3):169–182. doi:10.1007/PL00013733
Giorgi F, Mearns LO (2002) Calculation of average, uncertainty range, and reliability of regional climate changes from AOGCM simulations via the “reliability ensemble averaging”(REA) method. Journal of Climate 15(10):1141–1158
Goddard L, Kumar A, Solomon A, Smith D, Boer G, Gonzalez P, Kharin V, Merryfield W, Deser C, Mason SJ, Kirtman BP, Msadek R, Sutton R, Hawkins E, Fricker T, Hegerl G, Ferro CAT, Stephenson DB, Meehl GA, Stockdale T, Burgman R, Greene AM, Kushnir Y, Newman M, Carton J, Fukumori I, Delworth T (2013) A verification framework for interannual-to-decadal predictions experiments. Clim Dynam 40(1–2):245–272. doi:10.1007/s00382-012-1481-2
Hawkins E, Sutton R (2009) The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictions. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90(8):1095–1107. doi:10.1175/2009BAMS2607.1
Hawkins E, Sutton R (2011) The potential to narrow uncertainty in projections of regional precipitation change. Clim Dynam 37(1–2):407–418. doi:10.1007/s00382-010-0810-6
Hawkins E, Sutton R (2016) Connecting climate model projections of global temperature change with the real world. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 97(6):963–980. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00154.1
International CLIVAR Project Office (2011) Data and bias correction for decadal climate predictions.International CLIVAR Project Office, CLIVAR Publication Series No. 150, p 6. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/171975/1/ICPO150_Bias.pdf. Accessed 23 Feb 2017
Jackson C, Sen MK, Stoffa PL (2004) An efficient stochastic Bayesian approach to optimal parameter and uncertainty estimation for climate model predictions. J Clim 17(14):2828–2841
Jackson CS, Sen MK, Huerta G, Yi D, Bowman KP (2008) Error reduction and convergence in climate prediction. J Clim 21:6698–6709. doi:10.1175/2008JCLI2112.1
Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, Collins W, Deaven D, Gandin L, Iredell M, Saha S, White G, Woollen J, Zhu Y, Leetmaa A, Reynolds R, Chelliah M, Ebisuzaki W, Higgins W, Janowiak J, Mo KC, Ropelewski C, Wang J, Jenne R, Joseph D (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77(3):437–471
Keenlyside NS, Latif M, Jungclaus J, Kornblueh L, Roeckner E (2008) Advancing decadal-scale climate prediction in the North Atlantic sector. Nature 453(7191):84–88. doi:10.1038/nature06921
Kharin VV, Zwiers FW (2002) Climate predictions with multimodel ensembles. J Clim 15(7):793–799. doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2002) 015<0793:CPWME>2.0.CO;2
Kim HM, Webster PJ, Curry JA (2012) Evaluation of short-term climate change prediction in multi-model CMIP5 decadal hindcasts. Geophys Res Lett 39(10):L10,701
Kirtman B, Power SB, Adedoyin JA, Boer G, Bojariu R, Camilloni I, Doblas-Reyes FJ, Fiore AM, Kimoto M, Meehl GA, Prather M, Sarr A, SchÃd’r C, Sutton R, van Oldenborgh GJ, Vecchi G, Wang HJ(2013) Near-term climate change: Projections and predictability. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley P(eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group i to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA
Knutti R, Sedláček J (2013) Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections. Nat Clim Change 3:369–373
Knutti R, Allen MR, Friedlingstein P, Gregory JM, Hegerl GC, Meehl GA, Meinshausen M, Murphy JM, Plattne GK, Raper SCB, Stocker TF, Stott PA, Teng H, Wigley TML (2008) A review of uncertainties in global temperature projections over the twenty-first century. J Clim 21:2651–2663. doi:10.1175/2007JCLI2119.1
Kruschke T, Rust H, Kadow C, Leckebusch G, Ulbrich U (2014) Evaluating decadal predictions of northern hemispheric cyclone frequencies. Tellus A 66(1):22830. doi:10.3402/tellusa.v66.22830
Meehl GA, Goddard L, Murphy J, Stouffer RJ, Boer G, Danabasoglu G, Dixon K, Giorgetta MA, Greene AM, Hawkins E, Hegerl G, Karoly D, Keenlyside N, Kimoto M, Kirtman B, Navarra A, Pulwarty R, Smith D, Stammer D, Stockdale T (2009) Decadal prediction. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90(10):1467–1485
Meehl GA, Goddard L, Boer G, Burgman R, Branstator G, Cassou C, Corti S, Danabasoglu G, Doblas-Reyes F, Hawkins E, Karspeck A, Kimoto M, Kumar A, Matei D, Mignot J, Msadek R, Navarra A, Pohlmann H, Rienecker M, Rosati T, Schneider E, Smith D, Sutton R, Teng H, van Oldenborgh GJ, Vecchi G, Yeager S (2014) Decadal climate prediction: an update from the trenches. Bull Am Meteor Soc 95:243–267
Miao C, Duan Q, Sun Q, Huang Y, Kong D, Yang T, Ye A, Di Z, Gong W (2014) Assessment of CMIP5 climate models and projected temperature changes over Northern Eurasia. Environ Res Lett 9(5):055,007
Monier E, Scott JR, Sokolov AP, Forest CE, Schlosser CA (2013) An integrated assessment modeling framework for uncertainty studies in global and regional climate change: the MIT IGSM-CAM(version 1.0). Geoscientific Model. Development 6(6):2063–2085. doi:10.5194/gmd-6-2063-2013
Müller WA, Baehr J, Haak H, Jungclaus JH, Kröger J, Matei D, Notz D, Pohlmann H, von Storch JS, Marotzke J (2012) Forecast skill of multi-year seasonal means in the decadal prediction system of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology. Geophys Res Lett. doi:10.1029/2012GL053326
Müller WA, Pohlmann H, Sienz F, Smith D (2014) Decadal climate predictions for the period 1901–2010 with a coupled climate model. Geophys Res Lett 41(6):2100–2107. doi:10.1002/2014GL059259
Murphy JM, Sexton DMH, Barnett DN, Jones GS, Webb MJ, Collins M, Stainforth DA (2004) Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature 430(7001):768–772. doi:10.1038/nature02771
Palmer T, Buizza R, Hagedorn R, Lawrence A, Leutbecher M, Smith L (2006) Ensemble prediction: a pedagogical perspective. ECMWF Newslett 106:10–17
Pan Z, Christensen JH, Arritt RW, Gutowski WJ, Takle ES, Otieno F (2001) Evaluation of uncertainties in regional climate change simulations. J Geophys Res Atmos (1984–2012) 106(D16):17,735–17,751
Pohlmann H, Jungclaus JH, Kohl A, Stammer D, Marotzke J (2009) Initializing decadal climate predictions with the GECCO oceanic synthesis: effects on the North Atlantic. J Clim 22(14):3926–3938. doi:10.1175/2009JCLI2535.1
Räisänen J (2001) CO2-induced climate change in CMIP2 experiments: quantification of agreement and role of internal variability. J Clim 14(9):2088–2104. doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2001) 014<2088:CICCIC>2.0.CO;2
Smith DM, Cusack S, Colman AW, Folland CK, Harris GR, Murphy JM (2007) Improved surface temperature prediction for the coming decade from a global climate model. Science 317(5839):796–799. doi:10.1126/science.1139540
Solman SA, Sanchez E, Samuelsson P, da Rocha RP, Li L, Marengo J, Pessacg NL, Remedio ARC, Chou SC, Berbery H, Le Treut H, de Castro M, Jacob D (2013) Evaluation of an ensemble of regional climate model simulations over South America driven by the ERA-Interim reanalysis: model performance and uncertainties. Clim Dynam 41(5–6):1139–1157. doi:10.1007/s00382-013-1667-2
Strobach E, Bel G (2015) Improvement of climate predictions and reduction of their uncertainties using learning algorithms. Atmos Chem Phys 15:8631–8641. doi:10.5194/acp-15-8631-2015
Strobach E, Bel G (2016) Decadal climate predictions using sequential learning algorithms. J Clim 29(10):3787–3809. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0648.1
Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93(4):485
The NCAR Command Language (Version 6.0.0) [Software], 10.5065/D6WD3XH5, 2011
von Storch H, Zwiers, FW (2001) Statistical analysis in climate research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 146–150
Webster M, Forest C, Reilly J, Babiker M, Kicklighter D, Mayer M, Prinn R, Sarofim M, Sokolov A, Stone P et al (2003) Uncertainty analysis of climate change and policy response. Clim Change 61(3):295–320
Xu Z, Yang ZL (2012) An improved dynamical downscaling method with gcm bias corrections and its validation with 30 years of climate simulations. J Clim 25(18):6271–6286. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00005.1
Yang B, Qian Y, Lin G, Leung LR, Rasch PJ, Zhang GJ, McFarlane SA, Zhao C, Zhang Y, Wang H, Wang M, Liu X (2013) Uncertainty quantification and parameter tuning in the CAM5 Zhang-McFarlane convection scheme and impact of improved convection on the global circulation and climate. J Geophys Res Atmos 118(2):395–415. doi:10.1029/2012JD018213
Yip S, Ferro CAT, Stephenson DB, Hawkins E (2011) A simple, coherent framework for partitioning uncertainty in climate predictions. J Clim 24(17):4634–4643. doi:10.1175/2011JCLI4085.1
Zhao C, Chen S, Leung LR, Qian Y, Kok JF, Zaveri RA, Huang J(2013) Uncertainty in modeling dust mass balance and radiative forcing from size parameterization. Atmos Chem Phys 13(21):10,733–10,753. doi:10.5194/acp-13-10733-2013
Acknowledgements
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under Grant Number [293825]. We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for the CMIP, and we thank the climate modeling groups (listed in Table 1 of this paper) for producing and making available their model outputs. For the CMIP, the US Department of Energy’s Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides coordinating support and leads the development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Strobach, E., Bel, G. The contribution of internal and model variabilities to the uncertainty in CMIP5 decadal climate predictions. Clim Dyn 49, 3221–3235 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3507-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3507-7