Skip to main content

Mechanisms controlling the SST air-sea heat flux feedback and its dependence on spatial scale

Abstract

The turbulent air-sea heat flux feedback (\(\alpha\), in \(\text {W m}^{-2}\text { K}^{-1}\)) is a major contributor to setting the damping timescale of sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies. In this study we compare the spatial distribution and magnitude of \(\alpha\) in the North Atlantic and the Southern Ocean, as estimated from the ERA-Interim reanalysis dataset. The comparison is rationalized in terms of an upper bound on the heat flux feedback, associated with “fast” atmospheric export of temperature and moisture anomalies away from the marine boundary layer, and a lower bound associated with “slow” export. It is found that regions of cold surface waters (\(\le\)10 \(^\circ \,\)C) are best described as approaching the slow export limit. This conclusion is not only valid at the synoptic scale resolved by the reanalysis data, but also on basin scales. In particular, it applies to the heat flux feedback acting as circumpolar SST anomaly scales are approached in the Southern Ocean, with feedbacks of \(\le\)10 \(\text {W m}^{-2}\text { K}^{-1}\). In contrast, the magnitude of the heat flux feedback is close to that expected from the fast export limit over the Gulf Stream and its recirculation with values on the order of ≈40 \(\text {W m}^{-2}\text { K}^{-1}\). Further analysis suggests that this high value reflects a compensation between a moderate thermodynamic adjustment of the boundary layer, which tends to weaken the heat flux feedback, and an enhancement of the surface winds over warm SST anomalies, which tend to enhance the feedback.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Notes

  1. Strictly speaking the relative humidity is defined as the ratio of partial pressure of vapor, but we will neglect the very small difference introduced by our definition.

  2. As further discussed by Hausmann et al. (2016), the confidence in the estimate of \(\alpha\) is low at larger circumpolar scales and we thus focus on basin scales and smaller here (\(\le\) 90\(^\circ \,\) longitude).

References

  • Chelton DB, Schlax MG, Freilich MH, Milliff RF (2004) Satellite measurements reveal persistent small-scale features in ocean winds. Science 303(5660):978–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czaja A, Marshall J (2001) Observations of atmosphere-ocean coupling in the North Atlantic. Q J R Meteorol Soc 127:1893–1916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czaja A, van der Vaart P, Marshall J (2002) A diagnostic study of the role of remote forcing in tropical Atlantic variability. J Clim 15:3280–3290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dee DP, Uppala SM, Simmons AJ, Berrisford P, Poli P, Kobayashi S, Andrae U, Balmaseda MA, Balsamo G, Bauer P, Bechtold P, Beljaars ACM, van de Berg L, Bidlot J, Bormann N, Delsol C, Dragani R, Fuentes M, Geer AJ, Haimberger L, Healy SB, Hersbach H, Hlm EV, Isaksen L, Kllberg P, Khler M, Matricardi M, McNally AP, Monge-Sanz BM, Morcrette JJ, Park BK, Peubey C, de Rosnay P, Tavolato C, Thpaut JN, Vitart F (2011) The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137(656):553–597. doi:10.1002/qj.828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairall CW, Bradley EF, Hare JE, Grachev AA, Edson JB (2003) Bulk parameterization of air-sea fluxes: updates and verification for the COARE algorithm. J Clim 16(4):571–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira D, Frankignoul C, Marshall J (2001) Coupled ocean-atmosphere dynamics in a simple midlatitude climate model. J Clim 14:3704–3723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira D, Marshall J, Bitz CM, Solomon S, Plumb A (2015) Antarctic ocean and sea ice response to ozone depletion: a two timescale problem. J Clim 28:1206–1226. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00313.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankignoul C (1985) Sea surface temperature anomalies, planetary waves and air-sea feedback in the middle latitudes. Rev Geophys 23:357–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankignoul C, Kestenare E (2002) The surface heat flux feedback. Part I: estimates from observations in the Atlantic and the North Pacific. Clim Dyn 19:633–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankignoul C, Czaja A, L’Heveder B (1998) Air-sea feedback in the North Atlantic and surface boundary conditions for ocean models. J Clim 11:2310–2324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill AE (1982) Atmosphere-Ocean dynamics. International geophysics series, vol 30. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney RL (1971) Surface thermal boundary condition for ocean circulation models. J Phys Oceanogr 1:241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann U, Czaja A, Marshall J (2016) Estimates of air-sea feedbacks on sea surface temperature anomalies in the Southern Ocean. J Clim 29:439–454. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0015.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu WT, Tang W, Niiler PP (1991) Humidity profiles over the ocean. J Clim 4(10):1023–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill LW, Chelton DB, Esbensen SK (2012) Covariability of surface wind and stress responses to sea-surface temperature fronts. J Clim 25:5916–5942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park S, Deser C, Alexander MA (2005) Estimation of the surface heat flux response to sea surface temperature anomalies over the global oceans. J Clim 18:4582–4599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahmstorf S, Willebrand J (1995) The role of temperature feedback in stabilizing the thermohaline circulation. J Phys Oceanogr 25:787–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth KE, Caron JM, Stepaniak DP (2001) The atmospheric energy budget and implications for surface fluxes and ocean heat transport. Clim Dyn 17:259–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu L, Jin X, Weller RA (2008) Multidecade global flux datasets from the Objectively Analyzed Air-sea Fluxes (OAFlux) project: latent and sensible heat fluxes, ocean evaporation, and related surface meteorological variables. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, OAFlux Project Technical Report OA-2008-01

Download references

Acknowledgments

Ute Hausmann and John Marshall acknowledge support by the FESD program of NSF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ute Hausmann.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Estimating the heat flux feedback

The heat flux feedback \(\alpha\) as defined in (2) is estimated from timeseries of turbulent heat fluxes Q and SST T using lagged covariance analysis, as introduced by Frankignoul et al. (1998). Here we follow the method for seasonal feedback estimation described by Hausmann et al. (2016, i.e. as used to construct their Fig. 6). As therein major sources of low frequency variability (linear seasonal ENSO signals and trends) are removed from anomaly time series before the analysis. The feedback is then obtained for each month of the year as the \(T'\) \(Q'\) covariance function, weighted by the \(T'\) autocovariance

$$\begin{aligned} \alpha = \frac{\overline{T'(t)Q'(t+1 \delta t)}}{\overline{T'(t)T'(t+1 \delta t)}}, \end{aligned}$$
(12)

in which \(\delta t\) is one month and t is taken only in certain months of the year. For example, the February (F) feedback \(\alpha\)(F) is obtained taking t only in January and February (JF), that is from the response of February and March (FM) heat fluxes to JF SST, weighted by the latter’s own decay into FM: \(\alpha (F) = \frac{\overline{T'(JF)Q'(FM)}}{\overline{T'(JF)T'(FM)}}\). The annual-mean feedback displayed in Fig. 2 is then obtained as the average of the feedbacks estimated separately for each month of the year.

Appendix 2: Decomposition of the heat flux feedback into thermodynamic and dynamic components

The turbulent heat flux feedback can be written as \(\alpha = \alpha _{upper} + d\alpha\), and \(d\alpha\) (mapped in Fig. 3) is further decomposed as (11). Therein the thermodynamic component, \(d\alpha _{thdyn}\), reflects the contribution to the feedback, in departure from its upper bound, by thermal and moisture adjustments to SST anomalies (with the other properties of the MABL held fixed). It is given by the sum of the 2nd terms on the rhs of Eqs. (3) and (4), i.e.

$$\begin{aligned} d\alpha _{thdyn} = - \left( \overline{\rho ^a u^a c_S c_p^a}\ {\partial \left\langle {T^a}'\right\rangle }/{\partial T'}\ + \overline{\rho ^a u^a c_L L}\ {\partial \left\langle {q^a}'\right\rangle }/{\partial T'} \right) . \end{aligned}$$
(13)

To estimate (13) from data, \({\partial \left\langle {T^a}'\right\rangle }/{\partial T'}\,\)and \({\partial \left\langle {q^a}'\right\rangle }/{\partial T'}\,\)are obtained for each month of the year by applying the same lagged covariance analysis method as used for \(\alpha\) (see Appendix 1), which gives \({\partial \left\langle X'\right\rangle }/{\partial T'}\) with \(X = Q\), to \(X = T^a\) and \(q^a\). The other variables in (13) are estimated from monthly air-sea climatology, as in the estimate of the bounds in Sect. 3a. To capture seasonal correlations, the products in (13) are evaluated for each month of the year, before annually averaging. The result is mapped in Fig. 6a, b.

At the level of approximation used in Sect. 2,

$$\begin{aligned} d\alpha _{thdyn} \approx d\alpha _{therm} + d\alpha _{rhum}, \end{aligned}$$
(14)

in which the thermal adjustment contribution (\(d\alpha _{therm}\), mapped in Fig. 5c, d) is given by the sum of the 2nd terms on the rhs of (3) and (8) as:

$$\begin{aligned} d\alpha _{therm} = \overline{\rho ^a u^a} \left( \overline{c_S c_p^a} + \overline{c_L L}\overline{r_H}\frac{d q_{sat}}{dT}\left| _{\overline{T^a}\,}\right) \ {\partial \left\langle {T^a}'\right\rangle }{/\partial T'}\right. , \end{aligned}$$
(15)

and the relative humidity adjustment contribution is given by the 3rd term on the rhs of (8) as:

$$\begin{aligned} d\alpha _{rhum} = -\overline{\rho ^a u^a c_L L}q_{sat}(\overline{T^a}\,)\ {\partial \left\langle {r_H}'\right\rangle }/{\partial T'}. \end{aligned}$$
(16)

Estimation of these terms reveals that the residual of the approximation (14) lies within ±0.5 \(\text {W m}^{-2}\text { K}^{-1}\,\) everywhere in NA and SO (not shown). Differences between \(d\alpha _{thdyn}\) (Fig. 6a, b) and \(d\alpha _{therm}\) (Fig. 5c, d) are thus accounted for by the relative humidity adjustment contribution \(d\alpha _{rhum}\) (not shown).

The dynamical coupling contribution to the feedback, solely reflecting wind speed adjustments to SST anomalies \({\partial \left\langle {u^a}'\right\rangle }/{\partial T'}\), is obtained by evaluating (2) while keeping all MABL properties but \(u^a\) fixed, and then subtracting \(\alpha _{upper}\), with the result:

$$\begin{aligned} d\alpha _{dyn} = \left( \overline{\rho ^a c_S c_p^a} \left( \overline{T}- \overline{T^a}\right) +\overline{\rho ^a c_L L}\,\left( q_{sat}(\overline{T}) - \overline{q^a}\,\right) \right) \ {\partial \left\langle {u^a}'\right\rangle }/{\partial T'}. \end{aligned}$$
(17)

The remaining contribution \(d\alpha _{res}\) is then estimated as residual of the terms quantified in Eq. (11), that is as:

$$\begin{aligned} d\alpha _{res} = \alpha - (\alpha _{upper} + d\alpha _{thdyn} + d\alpha _{dyn}). \end{aligned}$$
(18)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hausmann, U., Czaja, A. & Marshall, J. Mechanisms controlling the SST air-sea heat flux feedback and its dependence on spatial scale. Clim Dyn 48, 1297–1307 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3142-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3142-3

Keywords

  • Sea surface temperature
  • Air-sea interaction
  • Feedback
  • Variability
  • Southern Ocean
  • North Atlantic