Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to elucidate a potential use of the large samples of seasonal means that hindcasts provide for investigating different aspects of climate variability. This use of hindcasts complements their traditional uses in bias correction, real-time forecast calibration, and prediction skill assessment. For seasonal hindcast data from NCEP CFSv2 we show that a sample size 5208 for each target season is achievable. To demonstrate the utility of the proposed concept, we use this large sample dataset to illustrate how it could be used in documenting spatial variability in various moments of seasonal mean precipitation PDF over the US, and further, quantify nuances in the variations in precipitation PDF at different geographical locations with the amplitude of ENSO SSTs. It is our hope that analysis presented in this paper will accelerate utilization of seasonal hindcast datasets in furthering our understanding of different aspects of climate variability. With the advantage of the large sample size, we demonstrated that the precipitation PDF at the each grid of the CONUS can be represented by gamma distribution for a more concise and effective way to summarize precipitation variability. The availability of the large sample dataset also allowed us to analyze the statistical characteristic of the precipitation responses to the different amplitudes of ENSO SSTs. The results show that for strong warm events, enhancement in precipitation has larger amplitude than decrease in precipitation for cold events in the regions of Southern California and southeastern US. The variation of the precipitation signal over the other sub-regions including the southwestern US, mid-northwest, and mid-east shows more linear relationship with the ENSO SSTs. In response to anomalous ENSO SSTs, although the PDF of December–January–February seasonal mean precipitation anomaly is shifted from its climatological PDF, there is still a large overlap between precipitation PDFs for ENSO and its climatological counterpart. This uncertainty in seasonal mean outcomes of precipitation, therefore, limits the seasonal prediction skill.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abid MA, Kang IS, Almazroui M, Kucharski F (2015) Contribution of synoptic transients to the potential predictability of PNA circulation anomalies: El Niño versus La Niña. J Clim 28:8347–8362. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00497.1
Becker M, Dool HVE, Zhang Q (2014) Predictability and forecast skill in NMME. J Clim 27:5891–5906. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00597.1
Burgers G, Stephenson DB (1999) The “Normality” of El Niño. Geophys Res Lett 26:1027–1030
Chen M, Kumar A (2015) Influence of ENSO SSTs on the spread of the probability density function for precipitation and land surface temperature. Clim Dyn 45:965–974. doi:10.1007/s00382-014-2336-9
Dong B (2005) Asymmetry between El Niño and La Niña in a global coupled GCM with an eddy-permitting ocean resolution. J Clim 18:3373–3387
Frauen C, Dommenget D, Tyrrell N, Rezny M, Wales C (2014) Analysis of the nonlinearity of El Nino—Southern oscillation teleconnections. J Clim 27:6225–6244. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00757.1
Graham RJ et al (2011) Long-range forecasting and the global framework for climate services. Clim Res 47:47–55. doi:10.3354/cr00963
Griffies SM, Harrison MJ, Pacanowksi RC, Rosati A (2004) Technical guide to MOM4.GLDL Ocean Group Technical Rep. p 5337. Available online at http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/fms
Groisman PY et al (1999) Changes in the probability of heavy precipitation: important indicators of climatic change. Clim Change 42:243–283
Hannachi A (2001) Toward a nonlinear identification of the atmospheric response to ENSO. J Clim 14:2138–2149
Hoerling MP, Kumar A, Zhong M (1997) El Nino, La Nina, and nonlinearity of their teleconnections. J Clim 10:1769–1786
Hoerling MP, Kumar A, Xu T-Y (2001) Robustness of the nonlinear climate response to ENSO’s extreme cases. J Clim 14:1277–1293
Husak GJ, Michaelsen J, Funk C (2006) Use of the gamma distribution to represent monthly rainfall in Africa for drought monitoring applications. Int J Climatol 27:935–944. doi:10.1002/joc.1441
Ison NT, Feyerherm AM, Bark LD (1971) Wet period precipitation and the gamma distributions. J Appl Meteorol 10:658–665
Janowiak JE, Xie P (1999) CAMS-OPI: a global satellite-rain gauge merged product for real time precipitation nonitoring application. J Clim 12:3335–3342
Jha B, Kumar A (2009) A comparative analysis of change in the first and second moment of the PDF of seasonal mean 200-mb height with ENSO SSTs. J Clim 22:1412–1423
Kirtman BP et al (2014) The North American Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME): phase-1 seasonal-to-interannual precipitation, phase-2 toward developing intra-seasonal precision. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 95:585–601. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-12-000050.1
Kumar A, Barnston AG, Pen P, Hoerling MP, Goddard L (2000) Changes in the spread of the variability of seasonal mean atmospheric states associated with ENSO. J Clim 13:3139–3151
Peng P, Kumar A (2005) A large ensemble analysis of the influence of tropical SSTs on seasonal atmospheric variability. J Clim 18:1068–1085
Phelps M, Kumar A, O’Brien J (2004) Potential predictability in the NCEP CPC dynamical seasonal forecast system. J Clim 17:3775–3785
Ropelewski CF, Halpert MS (1986) North American precipitation and temperature patterns associated with the El Nino/Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Mon Weather Rev 114:2352–2362
Ropelewski CF, Halpert MS (1989) Precipitation patterns associated with the high index phase of the southern oscillation. J Clim 2:268–284
Ropelewski CF, Janowiak JE, Halper MS (1985) The analysis and display of real-time surface climate data. Mon Weather Rev 113:1101–1106
Saha S et al (2010) The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bull Am Meteor Soc 91:1015–1057. doi:10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1
Saha S et al (2014) The NCEP climate forecast system version 2. J Clim 27:2185–2208. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00823.1
Straus DM, Shukla J (2002) Does ENSO force the PNA? J Clim 15:2340–2358
Ting M, Wang H (1997) Summertime U.S. precipitation variability and its relation to Pacific sea surface temperature. J Clim 10:1853–1873
Tippett MK, Kleeman R, Tang Y (2004) Measuring the potential utility of seasonal climate predictions. Geophys Res Lett 31:L22201. doi:10.1029/2004GL021575
Trenberth EK, Branstrator QW, Karoly D, Kumar A, Lau N-C, Ropelewski C (1998) Progress during TOGA in understanding and modeling global teleconnections associated with tropical sea surface temperature. J Geophys Res 103(C7):14291–14324
Weaver SJ, Kumar A, Chen M (2014) Recent increases in extreme temperature occurrence over land. Geophys Res Lett 41:4669–4675. doi:10.1002/2014GL060300
Wilks DS (1995) Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences: an introduction. Academic Press, San Diego
Wittenberg AT (2009) Are historical records sufficient to constrain ENSO simulations? Geophys Res Lett 36:L12702. doi:10.1029/2009GL038710
Yuan X, Wood E (2012) Downscaling precipitation or bias-correcting streamflow? Some implications for coupled general circulation model (CGCM)-based ensemble seasonal hydrologic forecast. Water Resour Res 48:w12519. doi:10.1029/2012WR012256
Yuan X, Wood E, Roundy JK, Pan M (2013) CFSv2-based seasonal hydroclimatic forecasts over the conterminous United States. J Clim 26:4828–4847. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00683.1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, M., Kumar, A. The utility of seasonal hindcast database for the analysis of climate variability: an example. Clim Dyn 48, 265–279 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3073-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3073-z