ENSO teleconnections with Australian rainfall in coupled model simulations of the last millennium
- 482 Downloads
El Niño-Southern Oscillation is the major source of interannual rainfall variability in the Australian region, with the strongest influence over eastern Australia. The strength of this regional ENSO–rainfall teleconnection varies in the observational record. Climate model simulations of the “last millennium” (850–1850 C.E.) can be used to quantify the natural variability of the relationship between ENSO and Australian rainfall on decadal and longer time scales, providing a baseline for evaluating future projections. In this study, historical and last millennium (LM) simulations from six models were obtained from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 and Palaeoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project Phase 3. All models reproduce the observed negative correlation between September to February (SONDJF) eastern Australian rainfall and the NINO3.4 index, with varying skill. In the LM simulations, all models produce decadal-scale cooling over eastern Australia in response to volcanic forcing, as well as a long-term cooling trend. Rainfall variability over the same region is not strongly driven by external forcing, with each model simulating rainfall anomalies of different phase and magnitude. SONDJF eastern Australian rainfall is strongly correlated with ENSO in the LM simulations for all models, although some models simulate periods when the teleconnection weakens substantially for several decades. Changes in ENSO variance play a role in modulating the teleconnection strength, but are not the only factor. The long-term average spatial pattern of the ENSO–Australian rainfall teleconnection is similar in the LM and historical simulations, although the spatial pattern varies over time in the LM simulations.
KeywordsEl Niño-Southern Oscillation Last millennium Coupled climate model Rainfall variability Australia
The contribution of JRB and PH was supported by the Australian Climate Change Science Program. JG is supported by an Australian Research Council Fellowship DE130100668. BH is funded by an ARC Cooperative Research Network (CRN) research grant. We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for CMIP, and we thank the climate modelling groups for producing and making available their model output. For CMIP the U.S. Department of Energy’s Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides coordinating support and led development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals. We thank Greg Kociuba for calculation of the equatorial SOI. We thank an anonymous reviewer for comments that greatly improved the manuscript. We also thank Sophie Lewis for discussion of model evaluation, and Ian Smith and Christine Chung for comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.
- Gergis J, Gallant AJE, Braganza K, Karoly DJ, Allen K, Cullen L, D’Arrigo R, Goodwin I, Grierson P, McGregor S (2012) On the long-term context of the 1997–2009 ‘Big Dry’ in south-eastern Australia: insights from a 206-year multi-proxy rainfall reconstruction. Clim Change 111:923–944. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0263-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Grose MR, Brown JN, Narsey S, Brown JR, Murphy BF, Langlais C, Sen Gupta A, Moise AF, Irving DB (2014) Assessment of the CMIP5 global climate model simulations of the western tropical Pacific climate system and comparison to CMIP3. Int J Climatol 34:3382–3399. doi: 10.1002/joc.3916 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jones DA, Wang W, Fawcett R (2009) High-quality spatial climate data-sets for Australia. Aust Meteorol Oceanogr J 58:233–248Google Scholar
- Masson-Delmotte V, Schulz M, Abe-Ouchi A, Beer J, Ganopolski A, González Rouco JF, Jansen E, Lambeck K, Luterbacher J, Naish T, Osborn T, Otto-Bliesner B, Quinn T, Ramesh R, Rojas M, Shao X, Timmermann A (2013) Information from paleoclimate archives. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Power S, Tseitkin F, Torok S, Lavery B, Dahni R, McAvaney B (1998) Australian temperature, Australian rainfall and the Southern Oscillation, 1910–1992: coherent variability and recent changes. Aust Meteorol Mag 47:85–101Google Scholar
- Schmidt GA, Jungclaus JH, Ammann CM, Bard E, Braconnot P, Crowley TJ, Delaygue G, Joos F, Krivova NA, Muscheler R, Otto-Bliesner BL, Pongratz J, Shindell DT, Solanki SK, Steinhilber F, Vieira LE (2012) Climate forcing reconstructions for use in PMIP simulations of the last millennium (v1.1). Geoscie Model Dev 5:185–191. doi: 10.5194/gmd-5-185-2012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schmidt GA, Annan JD, Bartlein PJ, Cook BI, Guilyardi E, Hargreaves JC, Harrison SP, Kageyama M, LeGrande AN, Konecky B, Lovejoy S, Mann ME, Masson-Delmotte V, Risi C, Thompson D, Timmermann A, Tremblay LB, Yiou P (2014) Using palaeo-climate comparisons to constrain future projections in CMIP5. Clim Past 10(1):221–250. doi: 10.5194/cp-10-221-2014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar