Global and European climate impacts of a slowdown of the AMOC in a high resolution GCM
- 2k Downloads
The impacts of a hypothetical slowdown in the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) are assessed in a state-of-the-art global climate model (HadGEM3), with particular emphasis on Europe. This is the highest resolution coupled global climate model to be used to study the impacts of an AMOC slowdown so far. Many results found are consistent with previous studies and can be considered robust impacts from a large reduction or collapse of the AMOC. These include: widespread cooling throughout the North Atlantic and northern hemisphere in general; less precipitation in the northern hemisphere midlatitudes; large changes in precipitation in the tropics and a strengthening of the North Atlantic storm track. The focus on Europe, aided by the increase in resolution, has revealed previously undiscussed impacts, particularly those associated with changing atmospheric circulation patterns. Summer precipitation decreases (increases) in northern (southern) Europe and is associated with a negative summer North Atlantic Oscillation signal. Winter precipitation is also affected by the changing atmospheric circulation, with localised increases in precipitation associated with more winter storms and a strengthened winter storm track. Stronger westerly winds in winter increase the warming maritime effect while weaker westerlies in summer decrease the cooling maritime effect. In the absence of these circulation changes the cooling over Europe’s landmass would be even larger in both seasons. The general cooling and atmospheric circulation changes result in weaker peak river flows and vegetation productivity, which may raise issues of water availability and crop production.
KeywordsClimate Impacts AMOC
This work was supported by the Joint DECC/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme (GA01101). We would like to thank M. Mizielinski for technical assistance in setting up and running HadGEM3 and C. Mathison and K. Williams for assistance with the river flow analysis. The authors would also like to thank Pete Falloon and Richard Betts for useful discussions during the preparation of this paper. Finally we wish to thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments which improved this manuscript.
- Arribas A, Glover M, Maidens A, Peterson K, Gordon M, MacLachlan C, Graham R, Fereday D, Camp J, Scaife AA, Xavier P, McLean P, Colman A, Cusack S (2010) The GloSea4 ensemble prediction system for seasonal forecasting. Mon Weather Rev 139(6):1891–1910. doi: 10.1175/2010mwr3615.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Collins M, Knutti R, Arblaster J, Dufresne JL, Fichefet T, Friedlingstein P, Gao X, Gutowski WJ, Johns T, Krinner G, Shongwe M, Tebaldi C, Weaver AJ, Wehner M (2013) Long-term climate change: projections, commitments and irreversibility. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Demory ME, Vidale P, Roberts M, Berrisford P, Strachan J, Schiemann R, Mizielinski M (2013) The role of horizontal resolution in simulating drivers of the global hydrological cycle. Clim Dyn 1–25: doi: 10.1007/s00382-013-1924-4
- Hunke EC, Lipscomb WH (2010) CICE: the Los Alamos Sea Ice Model, documentation and software user’s manual. Version 4.1. Technical report LA-CC- 06-012, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico. http://oceans11.lanl.gov/trac/CICE. Last access 6 Feb 2014
- Kageyama M, Merkel U, Otto-Bliesner B, Prange M, Abe-Ouchi A, Lohmann G, Roche DM, Singarayer J, Swingedouw D, Zhang X (2012) Climatic impacts of fresh water hosing under Last Glacial Maximum conditions: a multi-model study. Clim Past Discuss 8(4):3831–3869. doi: 10.5194/cpd-8-3831-2012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Madec G (2008) NEMO ocean engine, Note du Pole de modèlisation. France, no 27. ISSN No 1288–1619Google Scholar
- Scaife AA, Arribas A, Blockley E, Brookshaw A, Clark RT, Dunstone N, Eade R, Fereday D, Folland CK, Gordon M, Hermanson L, Knight JR, Lea DJ, MacLachlan C, Maidens A, Martin M, Peterson AK, Smith D, Vellinga M, Wallace E, Waters J, Williams A (2014) Skillful long-range prediction of European and North American winters. Geophys Res Lett 41(7):2014GL059,637+. doi: 10.1002/2014gl059637 Google Scholar
- Stouffer RJ, Yin J, Gregory JM, Dixon KW, Spelman MJ, Hurlin W, Weaver AJ, Eby M, Flato GM, Hasumi H, Hu A, Jungclaus JH, Kamenkovich IV, Levermann A, Montoya M, Murakami S, Nawrath S, Oka A, Peltier WR, Robitaille DY, Sokolov A, Vettoretti G, Weber SL (2006) Investigating the causes of the response of the thermohaline circulation to past and future climate changes. J Clim 19:1365–1387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Williams KD, Harris CM, Bodas-Salcedo A, Camp J, Comer RE, Copsey D, Fereday D, Graham T, Hill R, Hinton T, Hyder P, Ineson S, Masato G, Milton SF, Roberts MJ, Rowell DP, Sanchez C, Shelly A, Sinha B, Walters DN, West A, Woollings T, Xavier PK (2015) The Met Office Global Coupled model 2.0 (GC2) configuration. Geosci Model Dev Discuss 8(1):521–565. doi: 10.5194/gmdd-8-521-2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Woollings T, Franzke C, Hodson DLR, Dong B, Barnes EA, Raible CC, Pinto JG (2014) Contrasting interannual and multidecadal NAO variability. Clim Dyn 1–18. doi: 10.1007/s00382-014-2237-y