Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Using nudging to improve global-regional dynamic consistency in limited-area climate modeling: What should we nudge?

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Regional climate modelling sometimes requires that the regional model be nudged towards the large-scale driving data to avoid the development of inconsistencies between them. These inconsistencies are known to produce large surface temperature and rainfall artefacts. Therefore, it is essential to maintain the synoptic circulation within the simulation domain consistent with the synoptic circulation at the domain boundaries. Nudging techniques, initially developed for data assimilation purposes, are increasingly used in regional climate modeling and offer a workaround to this issue. In this context, several questions on the “optimal” use of nudging are still open. In this study we focus on a specific question which is: What variable should we nudge? in order to maintain the consistencies between the regional model and the driving fields as much as possible. For that, a “Big Brother Experiment”, where a reference atmospheric state is known, is conducted using the weather research and forecasting (WRF) model over the Euro–Mediterranean region. A set of 22 3-month simulations is performed with different sets of nudged variables and nudging options (no nudging, indiscriminate nudging, spectral nudging) for summer and winter. The results show that nudging clearly improves the model capacity to reproduce the reference fields. However the skill scores depend on the set of variables used to nudge the regional climate simulations. Nudging the tropospheric horizontal wind is by far the key variable to nudge to simulate correctly surface temperature and wind, and rainfall. To a lesser extent, nudging tropospheric temperature also contributes to significantly improve the simulations. Indeed, nudging tropospheric wind or temperature directly impacts the simulation of the tropospheric geopotential height and thus the synoptic scale atmospheric circulation. Nudging moisture improves the precipitation but the impact on the other fields (wind and temperature) is not significant. As an immediate consequence, nudging tropospheric wind, temperature and moisture in WRF gives by far the best results with respect to the Big-Brother simulation. However, we noticed that a residual bias of the geopotential height persists due to a negative surface pressure anomaly which suggests that surface pressure is the missing quantity to nudge. Nudging the geopotential has no discernible effect. Finally, it should be noted that the proposed strategy ensures a dynamical consistency between the driving field and the simulated small-scale field but it does not ensure the best “observed” fine scale field because of the possible impact of incorrect driving large-scale field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexandru A, de Elia R, Laprise R, Separovic L, Biner S (2009) Sensitivity study of regional climate model simulations to large-scale nudging parameters. Mon Weather Rev 137:1666–1686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthes R (1974) Data assimilation and initialization of hurricane prediction models. J Atmos Sci 31:702–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arakawa A, Konor CS (2009) Unification of the anelastic and quasi-hydrostatic systems of equations. Mon Weather Rev 137(2):710–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannon PR (1995) Hydrostatic adjustment: Lamb’s problem. J Atmos Sci 52:1743–1752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bao JW, Errico RM (1997) An adjoint examination of a nudging method for data assimilation. Mon Weather Rev 125:1355–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowden J, Otte T, Nolte C, Otte M (2012) Examining interior grid nudging techniques using two-way nesting in the WRF model for regional climate modeling. J Clim 25:2805–2823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell P, Chin HNS, Bader DC, Bala G (2009) Evaluation of a wrf dynamical downscaling simulation over California. Clim Change 95:499–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cha DH, Lee DK, Kuo YH (2006) An implementation of spectral nudging technique to the WRF model. In: 7th WRF users’ workshop, p 7.3

  • Davies HC, Turner RE (1977) Updating prediction models by dynamical relaxation: an examination of the technique. Q J R Meteorol Soc 103:225–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies T, Staniforth A, Wood N, Thuburn J (2003) Validity of anelastic and other equation sets as inferred from normal-mode analysis. Q J R Meteorol Soc 129:2761–2775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Elia R, Caya D, Frigon A, Biner S, Giguère M, Paquin D, Harvey R, Plummer D (2008) Evaluation of uncertainties in the CRCM-simulated North American climate. Clim Dyn 30:113–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denis B, Laprise R, Caya D, Côté J (2002a) Downscaling ability of one-way nested regional climate models: the Big-Brother experiment. Clim Dyn 18(8):627–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drobinski P, Ducrocq V, Lionello P, the HyMeX ISSC (2009) Hymex, a potential new CEOP RHP in the mediterranean basin. GEWEX Newsl 19:5–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubos T, Voitus F (2014) A semi-hydrostatic theory of gravity-dominated compressible flow. J Atmos Sci. doi:10.1175/jas-d-14-0080.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudhia J (1989) Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two dimensional model. J Atmos Sci 46:3077–3107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaounas E, Drobinski P, Borga M, Calvet JC, Delrieu G, Morin E, Tartari G, Roberta T (2012) Assessment of gridded observations used for climate model validation in the mediterranean region: the HyMeX and MED-CORDEX framework. Environ Res Lett. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/2/024017

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi F, Jones C, Asrar GR (2009) Addressing climate information needs at the regional level: the CORDEX framework. WMO Bull 58(3):175–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohenegger C, Brockhaus P, Bretherton CS, Schaer C (2009) The soil moisture-precipitation feedback in simulations with explicit and parameterized convection. J Clim 22:5003–5020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoke JE, Anthes R (1976) The initialization of numerical models by a dynamic initialization technique. Mon Weather Rev 104:1551–1556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holton JR (1992) An introduction to dynamic meteorology, 3rd edn. International geophysics series, vol 48. Academic Press, San Diego

  • Hong HMH, Juang S-Yand (1998) Implementation of prognostic cloud scheme for a regional spectral model. Mon Weather Rev 126:2621–2639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong SY, Dudhia J, Chen SH (2004) A revised approach to ice microphysical processes for the bulk parameterization of clouds and precipitation. Mon Weather Rev 132:103–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong SY, Noh Y, Dudhia J (2006) A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Mon Weather Rev 134:2318–2341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kain JS (2004) The Kain–Fritsch convective parameterization: an update. J Appl Meteorol 43:170–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanamaru H, Kanamitsu M (2007) Scale-selective bias correction in a downscaling of global analysis using a regional model. Mon Weather Rev 135(2):334–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kida H, Koide T, Sasaki H, Chiba M (1991) A new approach for coupling a limited area model to a GCM for regional climate simulations. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 69:723–728

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo YH, Guo YR, Westwater ER (1993) Assimilation of precipitable water measurements into a mesoscale numerical model. Mon Weather Rev 127:1215–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei L, Stauffer DR, Deng A (2012) A hybrid nudging-ensemble kalman filter approach to data assimilation in wrf/dart. Q J R Meteorol Soc 138:2066–2078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo JC, Yang ZL, Pielke RA (2008) Assessment of three dynamical climate downscaling methods using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. J Geophys Res 113:D09112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden RA (2007) Large-scale, free rossby waves in the atmosphere: an update. Tellus A 59(5):571–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miguez-Macho G, Stenchikov GL, Robock A (2004) Spectral nudging to eliminate the effects of domain position and geometry in regional climate model simulations. J Geophys Res 109:D13,104–D13,104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mlawer EJ, Taubman SJ, Brown PD, Iacono MJ, Clough SA (1997) Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J Geophys Res 102(D14):16663–16682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omrani H, Drobinski P, Dubos T (2012a) Investigation of indiscriminate nudging and predictability in a nested quasi-geostrophic model. Q J R Meteorol Soc 138:158–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omrani H, Drobinski P, Dubos T (2012b) Spectral nudging in regional climate modeling: how strongly should we nudge? Q J R Meteorol Soc 138:1808–1813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omrani H, Drobinski P, Dubos T (2013) Optimal nudging strategies in regional climate modelling: investigation in a Big-Brother experiment over the European and Mediterranean regions. Clim Dyn 41(9):2451–2470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otte TL (2008) The impact of nudging in the meteorological model for retrospective air quality simulations. Part I: evaluation against national observation networks. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 47(7):1853–1867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otte TL (2008) The impact of nudging in the meteorological model for retrospective air quality simulations. Part II: evaluating collocated meteorological and air quality observations. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 47(7):1868–1887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl B, Crétat J (2013) On the use of nudging techniques for regional climate modeling: application for tropical convection. Clim Dyn 43:1693–1714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radu R, Déqué M, Somot S (2008) Spectral nudging in a spectral regional climate model. Tellus A 60:898–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockel B, Castro CL, Pielke RA Sr, von Storch H, Leoncini G (2008) Dynamical downscaling: assessment of model system dependent retained and added variability for two different regional climate models. J Geophys Res 113(D21):107. doi:10.1029/2007JD009,461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers RE, Deng A, Stauffer D, Gaudet B, Jia Y, Soong ST, Tanrikulu S (2013) Application of the weather research and forecasting model for air quality modeling in the San Francisco bay area. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 52:1953–1973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salameh T, Drobinski P, Dubos T (2010) The effect of indiscriminate nudging time on large and small scales in regional climate modelling: application to the mediterranean basin. Q J R Meteorol Soc 136:170–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skamarock WC, Klemp JB (2007) A time-split nonhydrostatic atmospheric model for research and nwp applications. J Comput Phys 227:3465–3485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer D, Bao J (1993) Optimal determination of nudging coefficients using the adjoint equations. Tellus 45A:358–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer DR, Seaman NL (1990) Use of four-dimensional data assimilation in a limited-area mesoscale model. Part I: experiments with synoptic-scale data. Mon Weather Rev 118(6):1250–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Storch H, Langenberg H, Feser F (2000) A spectral nudging technique for dynamical downscaling purposes. Mon Weather Rev 128:3664–3673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor KE (2001) Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in single diagram. J Geophys Res 106:7183–7192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher M, McGregor JL (2009) Using a scale-selective filter for dynamical downscaling with the conformal cubic atmospheric model. Mon Weather Rev 137(6):1742–1752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidard PA, Dimet FXL, Piacentini A (2003) Determination of optimal nudging coefficients. Tellus A 55:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron KM, Paegle J, Horel JD (1996) Sensitivity of a spectrally filtered and nudged limited-area model to outer model options. Mon Weather Rev 124:529–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zampieri M, D’Andrea F, Vautard R, Ciais P, de Noblet-Ducoudré N, Yiou P (2009) Hot European summers and the role of soil moisture in the propagation of Mediterranean drought. J Clim 22:4747–4758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou X, Navon I, Le Dimet FX (1992) An optimal nudging data assimilation scheme using parameter estimation. Q J R Meteorol Soc 118:1163–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to R. Laprise for fruitful discussion. This research has received funding from the ANR-MEDUP project, GIS “Climat-Environnement-Société” MORCE-MED project, and through ADEME (Agence de l’Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l’Energie) contract 0705C0038. It was also supported by the IPSL group for regional climate and environmental studies. This work also contributes to the HyMeX program (HYdrological cycle in The Mediterranean EXperiment) through INSU-MISTRALS support and the Med-CORDEX program (A COordinated Regional climate Downscaling EXperiment—Mediterranean region).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiba Omrani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Omrani, H., Drobinski, P. & Dubos, T. Using nudging to improve global-regional dynamic consistency in limited-area climate modeling: What should we nudge?. Clim Dyn 44, 1627–1644 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2453-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2453-5

Keywords

Navigation