Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Simulations of the Asian monsoon using a regionally coupled-global model

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the simulation of June–September mean of the Asian monsoon in three different numerical experiments with a global climate model in which the atmosphere and ocean are coupled (coupled general circulation model, CGCM), regionally coupled (“Pacemaker”), and with specified sea surface temperature as in the Atmospheric Model Inter-comparison Project (AMIP) applied to a global atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM). The main features of the climatology for wind at 850 hPa, rainfall and zonal wind shear (U200–U850 hPa) over the South China Sea, subtropical western Pacific and Arabian Sea regions are remarkably well simulated in the Pacemaker experiment, compared with observations, whereas the CGCM and AGCM experiments either underestimate or overestimate magnitude of anomalies. The observed relationships between NINO3.4 (an index of El Niño and the Southern Oscillation, ENSO) and the Indian summer monsoon indices are remarkably better captured in the Pacemaker experiment than in the CGCM or AGCM/AMIP experiments. The pattern correlations between the first empirical orthogonal function (EOF) of the model simulations and that of the observed precipitation is higher in the Pacemaker experiment than in the CGCM or AGCM experiments over a large region (40°E–80°W, 20°S–30°N). The temporal correlation between the first principal component of the model simulation and the observations is also higher for the Pacemaker experiment than for the AGCM experiment. The northward/eastward propagation features and the spectral peaks (30–60 days) of rainfall are significantly more realistically captured by Pacemaker in comparison to CGCM and AGCM/AMIP. Based on the correlation coefficient between seasonal and pentad EOF1 and the related composite analysis, we have found that the Pacemaker is able to reproduce the relationship between the intraseasonal and interannual variability of the South Asian monsoon. The observed improvement in simulation in the Pacemaker experiment, as compared to the CGCM experiment, illustrates that a simple system having only local air–sea feedback is capable of greater realism than sophisticated coupled models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achuthavarier D, Krishnamurthy V (2010) Relation between intraseasonal and interannual variability of the South Asian monsoon in the National Centers for Environmental Predictions forecast systems. J Geophys Res 115:D08104. doi:10.1029/2009JD012865

    Google Scholar 

  • Achuthavarier D, Krishnamurthy V, Kirtman BP, Huang B (2012) Role of Indian Ocean in the ENSO-Indian summer monsoon teleconnection in the NCEP climate forecast system. J Climate 25:2490–2508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander MA, Blade I, Newman M, Lanzante JR, Lau N-C, Scott JD (2002) The atmospheric bridge: the influence of ENSO teleconnections on air–sea interaction over the global oceans. J Climate 15:2205–2231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angell JK (1981) Comparison of variations in atmospheric quantities with sea surface temperature variations in the equatorial eastern Pacific. Mon Wea Rev 109:230–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsugli JJ, Battisti DS (1998) The basic effects of Atmosphere–Ocean thermal coupling on midlatitude variability. J Atmos Sci 55:477–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracco A, Kucharski F, Molteni F, Hazeleger W, Severijns C (2007) A recipe for simulating the interannual variability of the Asian summer monsoon and its relation with ENSO. Clim Dyn 28:441–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen TC, Yen MC (1994) Interannual variation of the Indian monsoon simulated by the NCAR community climate model: effect of the tropical Pacific SST. J Climate 7:1403–1415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folland CK, Shukla J, Kinter III JL, Rodwell MJ (2002) C20C: the climate of the twentieth century project. CLIVAR Exchanges, 7(2) (June 2002) 37–39. Available from the International CLIVAR Project Office, Southampton Oceanography Centre, Empress Dock, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, UK (http://www.clivar.org/publications/exchanges/ex24/ex24.pdf

  • Gadgil S (2003) The Indian monsoon and its variability. Annu Rev Planet Sci 31:429–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates WL, Boyle J, Covey C, Dease C, Doutriaux C, Drach R, Fiorino M, Gleckler P, Hnilo J, Marlais S, Phillips T, Potter G, Santer B, Sperber K, Taylor K, Williams D (1998) An overview of the results of the atmospheric model intercomparison project (AMIP I). Bull Am Meteorol Soc 73:1962–1970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami BN, Ajayamohan RS (2001) Intraseasonal oscillations and interannual variability of the Indian summer monsoon. J Clim 14:1180–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilyardi E, Gualdi S, Slingo J, Navarra A, Delecluse P, Cole J, Madec G, Roberts M, Latif M, Terray L (2004) Representing El Niño in coupled ocean-atmosphere GCMs: the dominant role of the atmospheric component. J Climate 17:4623–4629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyos CD, Webster PJ (2007) The role of intraseasonal variability in the nature of Asian monsoon precipitation. J Clim 20:4402–4424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffman G et al (2001) Global precipitation at one-degree daily resolution from multi-satellite observations. J Hydrometeor 2:36–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ju J, Slingo JM (1995) The Asian summer monsoon and ENSO. Quart J R Meteorol Soc 121:1133–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalnay E et al (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang I-S, Jin K, Wang B, Lau K-M, Shukla J, Krishnamurthy V, Schubert SD, Wailser DE, Stern WF, Kitoh A, Meehl GA, Kanamitsu M, Galin VY, Satyan V, Park C-K, Liu Y (2002) Intercomparison of the climatological variations of Asian summer monsoon precipitation simulated by 10 GCMs. Clim Dyn 19:383–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein SA, Soden BJ, Lau N-C (1999) Remote sea surface variations during ENSO: evidence for a tropical atmospheric bridge. J Clim 12:917–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna Kumar K, Hoerling M, Rajagopalan B (2005) Advancing dynamical prediction of Indian monsoon rainfall. Geophys Res Lett 32:L08704. doi:10.1029/2004GL021979K

    Google Scholar 

  • Kucharski F, Bracco A, Yoo J-H, Molteni F (2007) Low-frequency variability of the Indian Monsoon-ENSO relationship and the Tropical Atlantic: the ‘Weakening’ of the 1980s and 1990s. J Clim 20:4255–4266. doi:10.1175/JCLI4254.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kucharski F, Scaife A, Yoo J, Folland C, Kinter J, Fereday D, Fischer A, Jin EK, Nath M, Pegion P, Sporyshev P, Voldoire A, Yoon JH, Zhou T, Schubert S (2009) The CLIVAR C20C project: skill of simulating Indian monsoon rainfall on interannual to decadal timescale. Does GHG forcing play a role? Clim Dyn 33:615–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latif M, Sperber K, Arblaster J, Braconnot P, Chen D, Colman A, Cubasch U, Cooper C, Delacluse P, DeWitt D, Fairhead L, Flato G (2001) ENSIP: the El Niño simulation intercomparison project. Clim Dyn 18:255–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau NC, Nath MJ (2000) Impact of ENSO on the variability of the Asian-Australian monsoons as simulated in GCM experiments. J Clim 13:4287–4307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau N-C, Nath MJ (2003) Atmosphere-Ocean variations in the Indo-Pacific sector during ENSO episodes. J Clim 16:3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence DM, Webster PJ (2001) Interannual variations of the intraseasonal oscillation in the South Asian Summer Monsoon Region. J Clim 14:2910–2922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mechoso CR, Robertson AW, Barth N, Davey MK, Delacluse P, Gent PR, Ineson S, Kirtman B, Latif M, LeTreut H, Nagai T, Neelin JD, Philander SGH, Polcher J, Schopf PS, Stockdale T, Suarez MJ, Terrray L, Thual O, Tribbia JJ (1995) The seasonal cycle over the tropical Pacific in coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation models. Mon Wea Rev 123:2825–2838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooley DA, Parthasarathy B (1984) Indian summer monsoon and El Niño. Pure appl Geophys 121:339–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer TN, Brankovic C, Viterbo P, Miller MJ (1992) Modelling interannual variations of summer monsoons. J Clim 5:399–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmusson EM, Carpenter TH (1983) The relationship between eastern equatorial Pacific sea surface temperature and rainfall over India and Sri Lanka. Mon Wea Rev 111:517–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner NA, Parker DE, Horton EB, Folland CK, Alenxander LV, Rowell DP, Kent EC, Kaplan A (2003) Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J Geophys Res 108(D14):4407. doi:10.1290/2003JD002670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha S et al (2010) The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 91:1015–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha S et al (2014) The NCEP climate forecast system version 2. J Clim 27:2185–2208

  • Scaife AA, Kucharski F, Folland CK, Kinter J, Bronnimann S, Fereday D, Fischer AM, Grainger S, Jin EK, Kang IS, Knight JR, Kusunoki S, Lau NC, Nath MJ, Nakaegawa T, Pegion P, Schubert S, Sporyshev P, Syktus J, Yoon JH, Zeng N, Zhou T (2009) The CLIVAR C20C project: selected twentieth century climate events. Clim Dyn 33:603–614. doi:10.1007/s00382-008-0451-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider EK, DeWitt DG, Rosati A, Kirtman BP, Ji L, Tribbia JJ (2003) Retrospective ENSO forecasts: sensitivity to atmospheric model and ocean circulation model: average error growth. J Atmos Sci 46:353–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukla RP (2014) The dominant intraseasonal mode of intraseasonal South Asian summer monsoon. J Geophys Res Atmos 119. doi:10.1002/2013JD020335

  • Shukla J, Paolino DA (1983) The Southern oscillation and long range forecasting of the summer monsoon rainfall over India. Mon Wea Rev 111:1830–1837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla J, Wallace JM (1983) Numerical simulation of the atmospheric response to equatorial Pacific sea surface temperature anomalies. J Atmos Sci 40:1613–1630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla RP, Tripathi KC, Pandey AC, Das IML (2011) Prediction of Indian Summer monsoon rainfall using Niño indices: a neural network approach. Atmos Res. doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.06.013

  • Slingo JM, Sperber KR, Boyle JS, Ceron JP, Dix M, Dugas B, Ebisuzaki W, Fyfe J, Gregory D, Gueremy JF, Hack J, Harzallah A, Inness P, Kitoh A, Lau WKM, McAvaney B, Madden R, Matthews A, Palmer TN, Park CK, Randall D, Renno N (1996) Intraseasonal oscillations in 15 atmospheric general circulation models: results from an AMIP diagnostic subproject. Clim Dyn 12:325–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber KR, Palmer TN (1996) Interannual tropical rainfall variability in general circulation model simulation associated with the atmospheric model intercomparison project. J Clim 9:2727–2750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waliser DE, Lau KM, Kim JH (1999) The influence of coupled sea surface temperatures on the Madden-Julian oscillation: a model perturbation experiment. J Atmos Sci 56:333–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Fan Z (1999) Choice of South Asian summer monsoon indices. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 80:629–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Wu R, Lau K-M (2001) Interannual variability of the Asian summer monsoon: contrasts between the Indian and the western North Pacific-East Asian monsoons. J Clim 14:4073–4090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Kang IS, Lee J-Y (2004) Ensemble simulations of Asian- Australian monsoon variability by 11 AGCMs. J Clim 17:803–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Ding Q, Fu X, Kang I-S, Jin K, Shukla J, Doblas-Reyes F (2005) Fundamental challenge in simulation and prediction of summer monsoon rainfall. Geophys Res Lett 32:L15711. doi:10.1029/2005GL022734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster PJ, Yang S (1992) Monsoon and ENSO: selectively Interactive systems. Quart J R Meteorol Soc 118:877–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster PJ et al (2002) The JASMINE pilot study. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 83:1603–1629

  • Wu R, Kirtman BP (2003) On the impacts of the Indian summer monsoon on ENSO in a coupled GCM. Quart J R Meteorol Soc 129B:3439–3468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu R, Kirtman BP (2004) Impacts of the Indian Ocean on the Indian summer monsoon-ENSO relationship. J Clim 17:3037–3054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie P, Arkin PA (1997) Analysis of global monthly precipitation using gauge observations, satellite estimates and numerical predictions. J Clim 9:840–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang S, Lau KM (1998) Influences of sea surface temperature and ground wetness on Asian summer monsoon. J Clim 11:3230–3246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou T, Wu B, Scaife AA, Bronnimann S, Cherchi A, Fereday D, Fischer AM, Folland CK, Jin KE, Kinter J, Knight JR, Kucharski F, Kusunoki S, Lau N-C, Lijuan L, Nath MJ, Nakaegawa T, Navarra A, Pegion P, Rozanov E, Schubert S, Sporyshev P, Voldoire A, Xinyu W, Yoon JH, Zeng N (2009) The CLIVAR C20C project: which components of the Asian–Australian monsoon circulation variations are forced and reproducible? Clim Dyn 33:1051–1068. doi:10.1007/s00382-008-0501-8

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author is supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF; 0830068 and 0947837), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA; NA09OAR4310058), and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA; NNX09AI84G). The second author was supported by grants from NSF (0830068), NOAA (NA09OAR4310058), and NASA (NNX09AN50G) for this study. We would like to thank Dr. Emilia Jin for conducting the climate simulations analyzed in this paper, and for carefully reading an early draft. Constructive comments from Prof. J. Shukla are greatly appreciated. The authors are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravi P. Shukla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shukla, R.P., Kinter, J.L. Simulations of the Asian monsoon using a regionally coupled-global model. Clim Dyn 44, 827–843 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2188-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2188-3

Keywords

Navigation