Skip to main content

Control of deep convection by sub-cloud lifting processes: the ALP closure in the LMDZ5B general circulation model

Climate Dynamics volume 40, pages 2271–2292 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

Recently, a new conceptual framework for deep convection scheme triggering and closure has been developed and implemented in the LMDZ5B general circulation model, based on the idea that deep convection is controlled by sub-cloud lifting processes. Such processes include boundary-layer thermals and evaporatively-driven cold pools (wakes), which provide an available lifting energy that is compared to the convective inhibition to trigger deep convection, and an available lifting power (ALP) at cloud base, which is used to compute the convective mass flux assuming the updraft vertical velocity at the level of free convection. While the ALP closure was shown to delay the local hour of maximum precipitation over land in better agreement with observations, it results in an underestimation of the convection intensity over the tropical ocean both in the 1D and 3D configurations of the model. The specification of the updraft vertical velocity at the level of free convection appears to be a key aspect of the closure formulation, as it is weaker over tropical ocean than over land and weaker in moist mid-latitudes than semi-arid regions. We propose a formulation making this velocity increase with the level of free convection, so that the ALP closure is adapted to various environments. Cloud-resolving model simulations of observed oceanic and continental case studies are used to evaluate the representation of lifting processes and test the assumptions at the basis of the ALP closure formulation. Results favor closures based on the lifting power of sub-grid sub-cloud processes rather than those involving quasi-equilibrium with the large-scale environment. The new version of the model including boundary-layer thermals and cold pools coupled together with the deep convection scheme via the ALP closure significantly improves the representation of various observed case studies in 1D mode. It also substantially modifies precipitation patterns in the full 3D version of the model, including seasonal means, diurnal cycle and intraseasonal variability.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Notes

  1. The fifth phase of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project.

  2. EUROpean Cloud Systems.

References

  • Ackerman A, Toon O, Stevens D, Heymsfield A, Ramanathan V, Welton E (2000) Reduction of tropical cloudiness by soot. Science 288:1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arakawa A, Chen JM (1987) Closure assumptions in the cumulus parameterization problem. Collection of papers at symposium of short- and medium range numerical prediction, Tokyo, Japan, WMO/IUGG NWP

  • Arakawa RA, Schubert WH (1974) Interaction of a cumulus cloud ensemble with the large scale environment. part I. J Atmos Sci 31:674–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bony S, Emanuel KA (2001) A parameterization of the cloudiness associated with cumulus convection; evaluation using TOGA COARE data. J Atmos Sci 58:3158–3183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bony S, Dufresne JL, Le Treut H, Morcrette JJ, Senior C (2004) On dynamic and thermodynamic components of cloud changes. Clim Dyn 22:71–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton C, McCaa J, Grenier H (2004) A new parameterization for shallow cumulus convection and its application to marine subtropical cloud-topped boundary layers. Part I: description and 1D results. Mon Wea Rev 132:864–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couvreux F, Hourdin F, Rio C (2010) Resolved versus parameterized boundary-layer plumes. Part I: a parameterization-oriented conditional sampling in large-eddy simulations. Boun Layer Meteor 134(3):441–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Couvreux F, Rio C, Guichard F, Lothon M, Canut G, Bouniol D, Gounou A (2012) Initiation of local convection in a semi-arid region analyzed with Large-Eddy Simulations and AMMA observations. Q J R Meteorol Soc 138:56–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Genio AD (2011) Representing the sensitivity of convective cloud systems to tropospheric humidity in general circulation models. Surv Geophys. doi:101007/s10712-011-9148-9

  • Del Genio AD, Yao MS (1993) Efficient cumulus parameterization for long-term climate studies: the GISS scheme. In: The representation of cumulus convection in numerical models, AMS Meteor Monograph KA Emanuel and DA Raymond, Eds, no 46 American Meteorological Society 24:181–184

  • Derbyshire SH, Beau I, Bechtold P, Gandpeix JY, Piriou JM, Redelsperger JL, Soares P (2004) Sensitivity of moist convection to environmental humidity. Q J R Meteorol Soc 130:3055–3079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donner L, Phillips VT (2003) Boundary layer control on convective available potential energy: Implications for cumulus parameterizations. J Geophys Res 108. doi:10.1029/2003JD003,773

  • Donner LJ (1993) A cumulus parametrization including mass-fluxes, vertical momentum dynamics, and mesoscale effects. J Atmos Sci 50:889–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel KA (1991) A scheme for representing cumulus convection in large-scale models. J Atmos Sci 48:2313–2335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel KA, Zivkovic-Rothman M (1999) Development and evaluation of a convection scheme for use in climate models. J Atmos Sci 56:1766–1782

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridlind AS, Ackerman AM, Chaboureau JP, Fan J, Grabowski WW, Hill A, Jones TR, Khaiyer MM, Liu G, Minnis P, Morrison H, Nguyen L, Park S, Petch JC, Pinty JP, Schumacher C, Shipway B, Varble AC, Wu X, Xie S, Zhang M (2012) A comparison of TWP-ICE observational data with cloud-resolving model results. J Geophys Res 117:D05,204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandpeix JY, Lafore JP (2010) A density current parameterization coupled to emanuel’s convection scheme. part i: the models. J Atmos Sci 67(4):881–897

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandpeix JY, Lafore JP, Cheruy F (2010) A density current parameterization coupled to emanuel’s convection scheme. part ii: 1d simulations. J Atmos Sci 67(4):898–922

    Google Scholar 

  • Guichard F, Petch J, Redelsperger J, Bechtold P, Chaboureau J, Cheinet S, Grabowski W, Grenier H, Jones C, Koehler M, Piriou JM, Tailleux R, Tomasini M (2004) Modelling the diurnal cycle of deep precipitating convection over land with cloud-resolving models and single column models. Q J R Meteorol Soc 130:3139–3172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hourdin F, Couvreux F, Menut L (2002) Parameterisation of the dry convective boundary layer based on a mass flux representation of thermals. J Atmos Sci 59:1105–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hourdin F, Musat I, Bony S, Braconnot P, Codron F, Dufresne JL, Fairhead L, Filiberti MA, Friedlingstein P, Grandpeix JY, Krinner G, LeVan P, Li ZX, Lott F (2006) The LMDZ4 general circulation model: climate performance and sensitivity to parametrized physics with emphasis on tropical convection. Clim Dyn 27:787–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hourdin F, Grandpeix JY, Rio C, Bony S, Jam A, Cheruy F, Rochetin N, Fairhead L, Idelkadi A, Musat I, Dufresne JL, Lefebvre MP, Lahellec A, Roehrig R (2012) From IPSL-CM5A to IPSL-CM5B: revisiting the parameterization of boundary-layer, clouds and convection in the LMDZ atmospheric model. Clim Dyn. doi: 10.1007/s00382-012-1343-y

  • Houze RA, Hobbs PV (1982) Organization and structure of precipitating cloud systems. Adv Geophys 24:225–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houze RA (1977) Structure and dynamics of a tropical squall-line system. Mon Wea Rev 105:1540–1567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffman GJ, Adler R, Morrissey MM, Bolvin DT, Curtis S, Joyce R, McGavock B, Susskind J (2001) Global precipitation at one degree daily resolution from multisatellite observations. J Hydrometeorol 2:36–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones TR, Randall DA (2011) Quantifying the limits of convective parameterizations. J Geophys Res 106:D08,210. doi:10.1029/2010JD014913

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen DP, Lemone MA (1989) Vertical velocity characteristics of oceanic convection. J Atmos Sci 46:621–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuang Z, Bretherton CS (2006) A mass-flux scheme view of a high-resolution simulation of a transition from shallow to deep convection. J Atmos Sci 63:1895–1909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kummerov C et al. (2001) The evolution of the Goddard profiling algorithm (GPROF) for rainfall estimation from passive microwave sensors. J Appl Met 40:1801–1820

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafore JP, Stein J, Asencio N, Bougeault P, Ducrocq V, Duron J, Fisher C, Hreil P, Mascart P, Masson V, Pinty JP, Redelsperger JL, Richard E, Vil-Guerau de Arellano J (1998) The Meso-NH atmospheric simulation system. Part I: adiabatic formulation and control simulations. Ann Geophys 16:90–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laval K, Sadourny R, Serafini Y (1981) Land surface processes in a simplified general circulation model. Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 17:129–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeMone MA, Pennell WT (1976) The relationship of trade wind cumulus distribution to subcloud layer fluxes and structure. Mon Wea Rev 104:524–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemone MA, Zipser EJ (1980) Cumulonimbus vertical velocity events in GATE. Part I: diameter, intensity and mass-flux. J Atmos Sci 37:2444–2457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima MA, Wilson JW (2008) Convective storm initiation in a moist tropical environment. Mon Wea Rev 136:1847–1864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lothon M, Campistron B, Chong M, Couvreux F, Guichard F, Rio C, Williams E (2011) Life cycle of a mesoscale circular gust front observed by a C-band Doppler radar in West Africa. Mon Wea Rev 139:1370–1388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas C, Zipser EJ, Lemone MA (1994) Vertical velocity in oceanic convection off Tropical Australia. J Atmos Sci 51:3183–3193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mapes B (2000) Convective inhibition, subgrid-scale triggering energy, and stratiform instability in a toy tropical wave model. J Atmos Sci 57:1515–1535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moncrieff MW, Miller MJ (1976) The dynamics and simulation of tropical cumulonimbus and squall lines. Q J R Meteorol Soc 102:373–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian L, Young GS, Frank WM (1998) A convective wake parameterization scheme for use in general circulation models. Mon Wea Rev 126:456–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redelsperger JL, Guichard F, Mondon S (2000) A parameterization of mesoscale enhancement of surface fluxes for large-scale models. J Clim 13:402–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rio C, Hourdin F (2008) A thermal plume model for the convective boundary layer: representation of cumulus clouds. J Atmos Sci 65:407–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rio C, Hourdin F, Grandpeix JY, Lafore JP (2009) Shifting the diurnal cycle of parameterized deep convection over land. Geophys Res Lett 36:L07,809. doi:10.1029/2008GL036779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rio C, Hourdin F, Couvreux F, Jam A (2010) Resolved versus parameterized boundary-layer plumes. Part II: continuous formulations of mixing rates for mass-flux schemes. Boun Layer Meteor 135:469–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozbicki JJ, Young G, Qian L (1999) Test of a convective wake parameterization in the single column version of CCM3. Mon Wea Rev 127:1347–1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner M, Houze R, Yuter SE (1995) Climatological characterization of three-dimensional storm structure from operational radar and rain gauge data. J Appl Met 34:1978–2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens DE, Ackerman AS, Bretherton CS (2002) Effects of domain size and numerical resolution on the simulation of shallow cumulus convection. J Atmos Sci 59:3285–3301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, A MG (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93:485–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiedtke M (1989) A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models. Mon Wea Rev 117:1179–1800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varble AM, Fridlind A, Zipser EJ, Ackerman AS, Chaboureau JP, Fan J, Hill A, McFarlane SA, Pinty JP, Shipway B (2011) Evaluation of cloud-resolving model intercomparison simulations using TWP-ICE observations: precipitation and cloud structure. J Geophys Res 116:D12,206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie S, Hume T, Jakob C, Klein S, Mccoy R, Zhang M (2010) Observed large-scale structures and diabatic heating and drying profiles during TWP-ICE. J Clim 23:57–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu KM, Randall DA (2000) Updraft and downdraft statistics of simulated tropical and midlatitude cumulus convection. J Atmos Sci 58:1630–1649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada T (1983) Simulations of nocturnal drainage flows by a q 2 l turbulence closure model. J Atmos Sci 40:91–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu P, Dudhia J, Field PR, Wapler K, Fridlind A, Varble A, Zipser E, Petch J, Chen M, Zhu Z (2012) A limited area model (LAM) intercomparison study of a TWP-ICE active monsoon mesoscale convective event (submitted to JGR)

  • Zipser EJ (1969) The role of organized unsaturated convective downdrafts in the structure and rapid decay of an equatorial disturbance. J Appl Met 8:799–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zipser EJ, Lemone MA (1980) Cumulonimbus vertical velocity events in GATE. Part II: synthesis and model core structure. J Atmos Sci 37:2458–2469

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, CNRS/IPSL, UPMC, Tr 45-55, 3e et, B99 Jussieu, 75005, Paris, France

    Catherine Rio

  2. LMD, Paris, France

    Jean-Yves Grandpeix, Frédéric Hourdin, Romain Roehrig, Nicolas Rochetin & Abderrahmane Idelkadi

  3. Centre National de la Recherche Météorologique (CNRM/GAME), Toulouse, France

    Francoise Guichard, Fleur Couvreux & Jean-Philippe Lafore

  4. Goddard Institute for Space Studies, NASA/GISS, New York, USA

    Ann Fridlind & Agnieszka Mrowiec

  5. LMD/CNRM, Paris, France

    Marie-Pierre Lefebvre

Authors
  1. Catherine Rio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jean-Yves Grandpeix
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Frédéric Hourdin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Francoise Guichard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fleur Couvreux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jean-Philippe Lafore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ann Fridlind
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Agnieszka Mrowiec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Romain Roehrig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Nicolas Rochetin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Marie-Pierre Lefebvre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Abderrahmane Idelkadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Rio.

Additional information

This paper is a contribution to the special issue on the IPSL and CNRM global climate and Earth System Models, both developed in France and contributing to the 5th coupled model intercomparison project.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rio, C., Grandpeix, JY., Hourdin, F. et al. Control of deep convection by sub-cloud lifting processes: the ALP closure in the LMDZ5B general circulation model. Clim Dyn 40, 2271–2292 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1506-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1506-x

Keywords

  • Deep convection parameterization
  • Triggering and closure
  • Oceanic versus continental convection
  • Diurnal cycle of precipitation
  • High resolution simulations to evaluate parameterizations assumptions