Climate Dynamics

, Volume 36, Issue 9–10, pp 2003–2014

Probabilistic assessment of regional climate change in Southwest Germany by ensemble dressing

Article

Abstract

Since single-integration climate models only provide one possible realization of climate variability, ensembles are a promising way to estimate the uncertainty in climate modeling. A statistical model is presented that extracts information from an ensemble of regional climate simulations to estimate probability distributions of future temperature change in Southwest Germany in the following two decades. The method used here is related to kernel dressing which has been extended to a multivariate approach in order to estimate the temporal autocovariance in the ensemble system. It has been applied to annual and seasonal mean temperatures given by ensembles of the coupled general circulation model ECHAM5/MPI-OM as well as the regional climate simulations using the COSMO-CLM model. The results are interpreted in terms of the bivariate probability density of mean and trend within the period 2011–2030 with respect to 1961–1990. Throughout the study region one can observe an average increase in annual mean temperature of approximately +0.6K and a corresponding trend of +0.15K/20a. While the increase in 20-year mean temperature is virtually certain, the 20-year trend still shows a 20% chance for negative values. This indicates that the natural variability of the climate system, as far as it is reflected by the ensemble system, can produce negative trends even in the presence of longer-term warming. Winter temperatures are clearly more affected and for both quantities we observe a north-to-south pattern where the increase in the very southern part is less intense.

keywords

Regional climate change Ensemble simulations Ensemble interpretation Probabilistic projections Kernel dressing Baden-Württemberg 

References

  1. Bröcker J, Smith L (2008) From ensemble forecasts to predictive distribution functions. Tellus A 60(4):663–678. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0870.2008.00333.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buser C, Künsch H, Lüthi D, Wild M, Schär C (2009) Bayesian multi-model projection of climate: bias assumptions and interannual variability. Clim Dyn. doi:10.1007/s00382-009-0588-6
  3. Collins M (2007) Ensembles and probabilities: a new era in the prediction of climate change. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 365(1857):1957–1970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Easterling D, Wehner M (2009) Is the climate warming or cooling? Geophys Res Lett 36(8):L08,706, 0094-8276Google Scholar
  5. Enke W, Deutschländer T, Schneider Füchler W (2005a) Results of five regional climate studies applying a weather pattern based downscaling method to ECHAM4 climate simulation. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 14:247–257. doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2005/0028
  6. Enke W, Schneider F, Deutschländer T (2005b) A novel scheme to derive optimized circulation pattern classifications for downscaling and forecast purposes. Theo Appl Climatol 82(1):51–63. doi:10.1007/s00704-004-0116-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fortin V, Favre AC, Said M (2006) Probabilistic forecasting from ensemble prediction systems: improving upon the best-member method by using a different weight and dressing kernel for each member. Q J R Meteorol Soc 132(617):1349–1369. doi:10.1256/qj.05.167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frame DJ, Faull NE, Joshi MM, Allen MR (2007) Probabilistic climate forecasts and inductive problems. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 365(1857):1971–1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gneiting T, Raftery AE, Westveld AH, Goldman T (2005) Calibrated probabilistic forecasting using ensemble model output statistics and minimum CRPS estimation. Mon Weather Rev 133(5):1098–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Green P, Silverman B (1994) Nonparametric regression and generalized linear models: a roughness penalty approach. Chapman and Hall/CRC, London/Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  11. Hastie T, Tibshirani R (1990) Generalized additive models. Chapman and Hall/CRC, London/Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  12. Honerkamp J (2002) Statistical physics: an advanced approach with applications, 2nd edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones R, Yohe G (2008) Applying risk analytic techniques to the integrated assessment of climate policy benefits. Integr Assess Jl 8(1):123–149Google Scholar
  14. Kattsov V, Källén E (2005) Future climate change: modeling and scenarios for the arctic. In: Arctic Climate Impact Assessment (ACIA), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 99–150Google Scholar
  15. Kreienkamp F, Spekat A, Enke W (2009) Sensitivity studies with a statistical downscaling method—the role of the driving large scale model. Meteorologische Zeitschrift (accepted)Google Scholar
  16. Min SK, Hense A (2006) A Bayesian assessment of climate change using multimodel ensembles. Part I: global mean surface temperature. J Clim 19(13):3237–3256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Min SK, Hense A (2007) A Bayesian assessment of climate change using multimodel ensembles. Part II: regional and seasonal mean surface temperatures. J Clim 20(12):2769–2790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. New M, Lopez A, Dessai S, Wilby R (2007) Challenges in using probabilistic climate change information for impact assessments: an example from the water sector. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 365(1857):2117–2131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Raftery AE, Gneiting T, Balabdaoui F, Polakowski M (2005) Using Bayesian model averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles. Mon Weather Rev 133(5):1155–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rockel B, Will A, Hense A (2008) The regional climate model COSMO-CLM (CCLM). Meteorologische Zeitschrift 17:347–348. doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2008/0309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Roeckner E, Bäuml G, Bonaventura L, Brokopf R, Esch M, Giorgetta M, Hagemann S, Kirchner I, Kornblueh L, Manzini E, Rhodin A, Schlese U, Schulzweida U, Tompkins A (2003) The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM5. Part I: model description. Tech. Rep. 349, Max Planck Institute for MeteorologyGoogle Scholar
  22. Schölzel C, Friederichs P (2008) Multivariate non-normally distributed random variables in climate research—introduction to the copula approach. Nonlin Processes Geophys 15(5):761–772, nPG 1023-5809Google Scholar
  23. Silverman B (1986) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC, London/Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  24. Solomon S, D Qin, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt K, Tignor M, Miller H (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Stainforth DA, Allen MR, Tredger ER, Smith LA (2007a) Confidence, uncertainty and decision-support relevance in climate predictions. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 365(1857):2145–2161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stainforth DA, Downing TE, Washington R, Lopez A, New M (2007b) Issues in the interpretation of climate model ensembles to inform decisions. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 365(1857):2163–2177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tebaldi C, Knutti R (2007) The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections. R Soc Lond Philos Trans Ser A 365:2053–2075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tebaldi C, Smith RL, Nychka D, Mearns LO (2005) Quantifying uncertainty in projections of regional climate change: a Bayesian approach to the analysis of multimodel ensembles. J Clim 18(10):1524–1540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wilks D, Hamill T (2007) Comparison of ensemble-MOS methods using GFS reforecasts. Mon Weather Rev 135:2379–2390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wilks DS (2006) Comparison of ensemble-MOS methods in the Lorenz ’96 setting. Meteorol Appl 13:243–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Meteorological InstituteUniversity of BonnBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations