Further analysis of singular vector and ENSO predictability in the Lamont model—Part I: singular vector and the control factors
- 114 Downloads
In this study, singular vector analysis was performed for the period from 1856 to 2003 using the latest Zebiak–Cane model version LDEO5. The singular vector, representing the optimal growth pattern of initial perturbations/errors, was obtained by perturbing the constructed tangent linear model of the Zebiak–Cane model. Variations in the singular vector and singular value, as a function of initial time, season, ENSO states, and optimal period, were investigated. Emphasis was placed on exploring relative roles of linear and nonlinear processes in the optimal perturbation growth of ENSO, and deriving statistically robust conclusions using long-term singular vector analysis. It was found that the first singular vector is dominated by a west–east dipole spanning most of the equatorial Pacific, with one center located in the east and the other in the central Pacific. Singular vectors are less sensitive to initial conditions, i.e., independence of seasons and decades; while singular values exhibit a strong sensitivity to initial conditions. The dynamical diagnosis shows that the total linear and nonlinear heating terms play opposite roles in controlling the optimal perturbation growth, and that the linear optimal perturbation is more than twice as large as the nonlinear one. The total linear heating causes a warming effect and controls two positive perturbation growth regions: one in the central Pacific and the other in the eastern Pacific; whereas the total linearized nonlinear advection brings a cooling effect controlling the negative perturbation growth in the central Pacific.
KeywordsENSO Predictability Singular vector analysis
This work is supported by Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences (CFCAS) GR523. Yanjie Cheng is also supported by the Graduate fellowship of NSERC PGS D2-362539-2008. This work benefits from discussions with Dr. Soon-IL An. We also thank Dr. B. P. Kirtman and one anonymous reviewer for their constructive comments.
- Kirtman BP, Shukla J, Balmaseda M, Graham N, Penland C, Xue Y, Zebiak S (2002) Current status of ENSO forecast skill. A report to the Climate Variability and Predictability. (CLIVAR) Numerical Experimentation Group (NEG), CLIVAR Working Group on Seasonal to Interannual Prediction. Available online at http://www.clivar.org/publications/wg_reports/wgsip/nino3/report.htm
- Tang Y, Deng Z (2009) Low-dimensional nonlinearity of ENSO and its impact on predictability. Physical D (submitted)Google Scholar