Recent studies have shown that changes in global mean precipitation are larger for solar forcing than for CO2 forcing of similar magnitude. In this paper, we use an atmospheric general circulation model to show that the differences originate from differing fast responses of the climate system. We estimate the adjusted radiative forcing and fast response using Hansen’s “fixed-SST forcing” method. Total climate system response is calculated using mixed layer simulations using the same model. Our analysis shows that the fast response is almost 40% of the total response for few key variables like precipitation and evaporation. We further demonstrate that the hydrologic sensitivity, defined as the change in global mean precipitation per unit warming, is the same for the two forcings when the fast responses are excluded from the definition of hydrologic sensitivity, suggesting that the slow response (feedback) of the hydrological cycle is independent of the forcing mechanism. Based on our results, we recommend that the fast and slow response be compared separately in multi-model intercomparisons to discover and understand robust responses in hydrologic cycle. The significance of this study to geoengineering is discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Adler RF et al (2008) Relationships between global precipitation and surface temperature on interannual and longer timescales (1979–2006). J Geophys Res Atmos 113:D22103. doi:10.1029/2008JD010536
Allen MR, Ingram WJ (2002) Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle. Nature 419:224–232. doi:10.1038/nature01092
Andrews T, Forster PM (2008) CO2 forcing induces semi-direct effects with consequences for climate feedback interpretations. Geophys Res Lett 35:L04802. doi:10.1029/2007GL032273
Andrews T et al (2009) A surface energy perspective on climate change. J Clim (in press)
Bala G et al (2008) Impact of geoengineering schemes on the global hydrological cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(22):7664–7669. doi:10.1073/pnas.0711648105
Betts RA et al (2007) Projected increase in continental runoff due to plant responses to increasing carbon dioxide. Nature 448:1037–1041. doi:10.1038/nature06045
Cao L et al (2009) Climate response to physiological forcing of carbon dioxide simulated by the coupled Community Atmosphere Model (CAM3.1) and Community Land Model (CLM3.0). Geophys Res Lett (in press)
Collins WD et al (2006a) Radiative forcing by well-mixed greenhouse gases: estimates from climate models in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4). J Geophys Res Atmos 111:D14317
Collins WD et al (2006b) The formulation and atmospheric simulation of the Community Atmosphere Model version 3 (CAM3). J Clim 19(11):2144–2161. doi:10.1175/JCLI3760.1
Gedney N et al (2006) Detection of a direct carbon dioxide effect in continental river runoff records. Nature 439:835–838. doi:10.1038/nature04504
Gregory J, Webb M (2008) Tropospheric adjustment induces a cloud component in CO2 forcing. J Clim 21(1):58–71. doi:10.1175/2007JCLI1834.1
Gregory JM et al (2004) A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity. Geophys Res Lett 31:L03205. doi:10.1029/2003GL018747
Hansen J et al (1997) Radiative forcing and climate response. J Geophys Res Atmos 102(D6):6831–6864. doi:10.1029/96JD03436
Hansen J et al (2005) Efficacy of climate forcings. J Geophys Res Atmos 110:D18104
Held IM, Soden BJ (2006) Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J Clim 19(21):5686–5699. doi:10.1175/JCLI3990.1
IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lambert FH, Faull NE (2007) Tropospheric adjustment: the response of two general circulation models to a change in insolation. Geophys Res Lett 34:L03701. doi:10.1029/2006GL028124
Levis S et al (1999) Potential high-latitude vegetation feedbacks on CO2-induced climate change. Geophys Res Lett 26(6):747–750. doi:10.1029/1999GL900107
Levis S et al (2000) Large-scale vegetation feedbacks on a doubled CO2 climate. J Clim 13(7):1313–1325. doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<1313:LSVFOA>2.0.CO;2
Lunt DJ et al (2008) “Sunshade World”: a fully coupled GCM evaluation of the climatic impacts of geoengineering. Geophys Res Lett 35:L12710. doi:10.1029/2008GL033674
Matthews HD, Caldeira K (2007) Transient climate-carbon simulations of planetary geoengineering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(24):9949–9954. doi:10.1073/pnas.0700419104
Rasch PJ et al (2008) Exploring the geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulfate aerosols: the role of particle size. Geophys Res Lett 35:L02809. doi:10.1029/2007GL032179
Robock A et al (2008) Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO2 injections. J Geophys Res 113:D16101. doi:16110.11029/12008JD010050
Sellers PJ et al (1996) Comparison of radiative and physiological effects of doubled atmospheric CO2 on climate. Science 271(5254):1402–1406. doi:10.1126/science.271.5254.1402
Shine KP et al (2003) An alternative to radiative forcing for estimating the relative importance of climate change mechanisms. Geophys Res Lett 30:2047. doi:10.1029/2003GL018141
Wentz FJ et al (2007) How much more rain will global warming bring? Science 317(5835):233–235. doi:10.1126/science.1140746
Yang FL et al (2003) Intensity of hydrological cycles in warmer climates. J Clim 16(14):2419–2423. doi:10.1175/2779.1
We thank Prof. J. Srinivasan and Drs. Karl Taylor and Peter Caldwell for their interest in this work and helpful discussions on fast adjustments induced by instantaneous CO2 and solar forcings.
About this article
Cite this article
Bala, G., Caldeira, K. & Nemani, R. Fast versus slow response in climate change: implications for the global hydrological cycle. Clim Dyn 35, 423–434 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0583-y
- Latent Heat Flux
- Land Surface Temperature
- Slow Response
- Fast Adjustment
- Hydrologic Sensitivity