Skip to main content
Log in

Ice thickness variability in the Arctic Ocean between 1954–1990, results from a coupled ocean-ice-atmosphere column model

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interannual variation of the Arctic Ocean ice thickness during the period 1954–1990 is investigated by using a coupled ocean-ice-atmosphere column model. The model is forced by poleward energy flux in the atmosphere from NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data, ice export from satellite observations, cloudiness, and precipitation observed at the Russian North Pole drift stations. During the period 1977–1986 the model ice thickness decreased from 3.2 m to 2.0 m. The decrease is mainly caused by extra melting due to larger poleward energy flux in summer, and reduced ice growth in winter as a result of both increased cloudiness and energy flux. Precipitation and ice export are of less importance. A sensitivity study shows that the NCEP/NCAR data is accurate enough with respect to stochastic errors to ensure that the thinning is not caused by forcing errors. It is also shown that the poleward energy flux during summer is the dominant factor for regulating the ice thickness. The column model gives different results compared to other model studies using 2D ice models, especially towards the end of the period. Possible reasons for this disparity are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1a, b.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 13.
Fig. 14.
Fig. 15.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beesley JA (2000) Estimating the effect of clouds on the Arctic surface energy budget. J Geophys Res 105: 10,103–10,117

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker P, Björk G (1996) Residence times in the upper Arctic Ocean. J Geophys Res 101(C12): 28,377–28,396

    Google Scholar 

  • Björk G (1989) A one-dimensional time-dependent model for the vertical stratification of the upper Arctic Ocean. J Phys Oceanogr 19(1): 52–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björk G (1997) The relation between ice deformation oceanic heat flux and the ice thickness distribution in the Arctic Ocean. J Geophys Res 102(C8): 18,681–18,698

    Google Scholar 

  • Björk G, Söderkvist J (2002) Dependence of the Arctic Ocean ice thickness distribution on the poleward energy flux in the atmosphere. J Geophys Res (in press)

  • Briegleb BP, Bromwich DH (1998) Polar radiation budgets of the NCAR CCM3. J Clim 11: 1246–1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebert EE, Curry JA (1993) An intermediate one-dimensional thermodynamic sea ice model for investigating ice-atmosphere interactions. J Geophys Res 98(C6): 10,085–10,109

    Google Scholar 

  • Hack JJ, Boville BA, Briegleb BP, Kiehl JT, Rasch PJ, Williamson DL (1993) Description of the NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM2) NCAR Tech Note NCAR/TN-382+STR 108 pp Natl Cent For Atmos Res Boulder, Colorado, USA

  • Hilmer M, Lemke P (2000) On the decrease of Arctic sea ice volume. Geophys Res Lett 27(22): 3751–3754

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway G, Sou T (1999) Has Arctic sea ice rapidly thinned? J Clim 15(13): 1691–1701, 2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwok R, Rothrock DA (1999) Variability of Fram Strait ice flux and North Atlantic Oscillation. J Geophys Res: 5177–5189

  • Marshunova MS, Mishin AA (1994) Handbook of the radiation regime of the Arctic Basin: Results from the drift stations. In: Radionov VF, Colony R (eds) University of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory Technical Report APL-UW TR9413 52 pp plus appendices

  • Maykut GA (1982) Large scale heat exchange and ice production in the central Arctic. J Geophys Res 87: 7971–7984

    Google Scholar 

  • Overland JE, Turet P (1994) Variability of the atmospheric energy flux across 70°N computed from the GFDL data set in Johannessen. In: OM, Muench RD, Overland JE (eds) Polar Oceans and their role in shaping the global environment. American Geophysical Union, pp 540

  • Polyakov IV, Johnson MA (2000) Arctic decadal and interdecadal variability. Geophys Res Lett (24): 4097–4100

  • Roach AT, Aagard K, Pease CH, Salo SA, Weingartner T, Pavlov V, Kulakov M (1995) Direct measurements of transport and water properties through the Bering Strait. J Geophys Res 100: 18443–18457

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothrock D, Yu AY, Maykut GA (1999) Thinning of the Arctic Sea-Ice cover. Geophys Res Lett 26: 3469–3473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike AS (1992) A Toy model linking atmospheric thermal radiation and sea ice growth. J Geophys Res 97: 9401–9410

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth KE, Caron JM, Stepaniak DP (2001) The atmospheric energy budget and implications for surface fluxes and ocean heat transports. Clim Dyn 17(4): 259–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh JE, Chapman L (2001) 20th-century sea-ice variations from observational data. Ann Glaciol 33: 444–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Rothrock DA, Steele M (1998) Correction to “Warming of the Arctic Ocean by a strengthened Atlantic inflow: Model results”. Geophys Res Lett 25: 3541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JL, Rothrock D, Steele M (2000) Recent changes in Arctic sea ice: The interplay between ice dynamics and thermodynamics. J Clim 13: 17 3099–3114

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements.

The authors thank JA Beesley for providing us with an improved version of the NCAR Column Radiation Model; Prof. G. Walin for valuable discussions and guidance throughout the work; and S Nerheim whose comments improved the manuscript. Financial support was given by the Swedish Research Council (VR) under the following grant: G 650-19981511/2000.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Söderkvist.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Söderkvist, J., Björk, G. Ice thickness variability in the Arctic Ocean between 1954–1990, results from a coupled ocean-ice-atmosphere column model. Climate Dynamics 22, 57–68 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-003-0363-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-003-0363-z

Keywords

Navigation