Climate Dynamics

, Volume 20, Issue 7–8, pp 865–873 | Cite as

A comparison of climate feedbacks in general circulation models

Article

Abstract.

A comparison is performed for water vapour, cloud, albedo and lapse rate feedbacks taken from published results of 'offline' feedback calculations for general circulation models (GCMs) with mixed layer oceans performing 2 × CO2 and solar perturbation experiments. All feedbacks show substantial inter-model spread. The impact of uncertainties in feedbacks on climate sensitivity is discussed. A negative correlation is found between water vapour and lapse rate feedbacks, and also between longwave and shortwave components of the cloud feedback. The mean values of the feedbacks are compared with results derived from model intercomparisons which evaluated cloud forcing derived feedbacks under idealized climate forcing. Results are found to be comparable between the two approaches, after allowing for differences in experimental technique and diagnostic method. Recommendations are made for the future reporting of climate feedbacks.

References

  1. Arking A (1991) The radiative effects of clouds and their impact on climate. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 71: 795–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cess RD, Potter GL, Blanchet JP, Boer GJ, Ghan SJ, Hansen J, Kiehl JT, Le Treut H, Li Z-X, Liang X-Z, McAvaney BJ, Meleshko VP, Mitchell JFB, Morcrette J-J, Randall DA, Rikus LJ, Roeckner E, Schlese U, Sheinin DA, Slingo A, Sokolov AP, Taylor KE, Washington WM, Wetherald RT, Yagaii I (1990) Intercomparison and interpretation of cloud-climate feedback processes in nineteen atmospheric general circulation models. J Geophys Res 95: 16,601–16,615Google Scholar
  3. Cess RD, Potter GL, Blanchet JP, Boer GJ, Colman R, Ghan SJ, Hansen J, Kiehl JT, Le Treut H, Li Z-X, Liang X-Z, McAvaney BJ, Meleshko VP, Mitchell JFB, Morcrette J-J, Randall DA, Rikus LJ, Roeckner E, Schlese U, Sheinin DA, Slingo A, Sokolov AP, Taylor KE, Washington WM, Wetherald RT, Yagaii I (1991) Intercomparison and interpretation of snow-climate feedback processes in seventeen atmospheric general circulation models. Science 253: 888–892Google Scholar
  4. Cess RD, Zhang MH, Potter GL, Alekseev V, Barker HW, Cohen-Solal E, Colman RA, Dazlich DA, Del Genio AD, Dix MR, Dymnikov V, Esch M, Fowler LD, Fraser JR, Galin V, Gates WL, Hack JJ, Kiehl JT, Le Treut H, Lo KW, McAvaney BJ, Meleshko VP, Morcrette JJ, Randall DA, Roeckner E, Royer J-F, Schlesinger ME, Sporyshev PV, Taylor KE, Timbal B, Volodin EM, Wang W, Wetherald RT (1996) Cloud feedback in atmospheric general circulation models: an update. J Geophys Res 101: 12,791–12,794Google Scholar
  5. Colman RA (2001) On the vertical extent of atmospheric feedbacks. Clim Dyn 17: 391–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Colman RA, McAvaney BJ (1997) A study of GCM climate feedbacks from perturbed SST experiments. J Geophys Res 102: 19,383–19,402Google Scholar
  7. Colman RA, Power SB, McAvaney BJ (1997) Non-linear climate feedback analysis in an atmospheric GCM. Clim Dyn 13: 717–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colman RA, Fraser JR, Rotstayn LD (2001) Climate feedbacks in a general circulation model incorporating prognostic clouds. Clim Dyn 18: 103–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gong W, Zhou X, Wang W-C (1994) A diagnostic study of feedback mechanisms in greenhouse effects simulated by NCAR CCM1. Acta Meteorol Sinica 8: 270–282Google Scholar
  10. Hansen J, Johnson D, Lacis A, Lebedeff S, Lee P, Rind D, Russell G (1981) Climate impacts of increasing carbon dioxide. Science 213: 957–966Google Scholar
  11. Hansen J, Lacis A, Rind D, Russell G, Stone P, Fung I, Ruedy R, Lerner J (1984) Climate sensitivity: analysis of feedback mechanisms. In: Hansen JE, Takahashi T (eds) Climate processes and climate sensitivity, American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, USA, pp 130–163Google Scholar
  12. Hansen J, Sato M, Reudy R (1997) Radiative forcing and climate response. J Geophys Res 102: 6831–6864Google Scholar
  13. Held IM, Soden BJ (2000) Water vapour feedback and global warming. Annu Rev Energy Environ 25: 441–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ingram WJ, Wilson CA, Mitchell JFB (1989) Modelling climate change: an assessment of sea ice and surface albedo feedbacks. J Geophys Res 94: 8609–8622Google Scholar
  15. IPCC (1996) Climate change 1995, the science of climate change. Houghton JT, Meira Filho LG, Callander BA, Harris N, Kattenberg A, Maskell K (eds) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 572Google Scholar
  16. IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA (eds) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 881Google Scholar
  17. Le Treut H, Li ZX, Forichon M (1994) Sensitivity study of the LMD GCM to greenhouse forcing associated with two different cloud water parametrizations. J Clim 7: 1827–1841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McAvaney BJ, Colman RA (1996) Water vapor and cloud feedbacks in the BMRC GCM. In: Le Treut H (ed) Climate sensitivity to radiative perturbations physical mechanisms and their validation. NATO ASI vol I 34, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 171–190Google Scholar
  19. Mitchell JFB, Ingram WJ (1992) Carbon dioxide and climate: mechanisms of changes in cloud. J Clim 5: 5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Roeckner E, Schlese U, Biercamp J, Loewe P (1987) Cloud optical depth feedbacks and climate modelling. Nature 329: 138–140Google Scholar
  21. Schlesinger ME (1988) Quantitative analysis of feedbacks in climate model simulations of CO2 induced warming. In: Schlesinger ME (ed) Physically based modelling and simulation of climate and climate change. NATO ASI Series C, vol 243 Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  22. Schneider EK, Kirtman BP, Lindzen RS (1999) Tropospheric water vapor and climate sensitivity. J Atmos Sci 56: 1649–1658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Senior CA, Mitchell JFB (1993) Carbon dioxide and climate: the impact of cloud paramatrization. J Clim 6: 393–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Taylor KE, Ghan SJ (1992) An analysis of cloud liquid water feedback and global climate sensitivity in a general circulation model. J Clim 5: 907–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Watterson IG, Dix MR, Colman RA (1999) A comparison of present and doubled CO2 climates and feedbacks simulated by three GCMs. J Geophys Res 104: 1943–1956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wetherald RT (1996) Feedback processes in the GFDL R30-14 level general circulation model. In: Le Treut H (ed) Climate sensitivity to radiative perturbations physical mechanisms and their validation. NATO ASI vol I 34, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 251–267Google Scholar
  27. Wetherald RT, Manabe S (1988) Cloud feedback processes in a GCM. J Atmos Sci 45: 1397–1415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yao M-S, Del Genio AD (1999) Effects of cloud parametization on the simulation of climate changes in the GISS GCM. J Clim 12: 761–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang MH, Cess RD, Hack JJ, Kiehl JT (1994) Diagnostic study of climate feedback processes in atmospheric general circulation models. J Geophys Res 99: 5525–5537Google Scholar
  30. Zhang MH, Kiehl JT, Hack JJ (1996) Cloud-radiative feedback as produced by different parametrizations of cloud emissivity in CCM2. In: Le Treut H (ed) Climate sensitivity to radiative perturbations: physical mechanisms and their validation. NATO ASI, Ser. I, vol 34, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, New York, pp 213–230Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bureau of Meteorology Research Centre, GPO Box 1289K Melbourne 3001, Australia

Personalised recommendations