Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Feasibility and safety of stereoelectroencephalography in young children

  • Mini Review
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a diagnostic surgery that implants electrodes to identify areas of epileptic onset in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). SEEG is effective in identifying the epileptic zone; however, placement of electrodes in very young children has been considered contraindicated due to skull thinness. The goal of this study was to evaluate if SEEG is safe and accurate in young children with thin skulls.

Methods

Four children under the age of two years old with DRE underwent SEEG to locate the region of seizure onset. Presurgical planning and placement of electrodes were performed using ROSA One Brain. Preoperative electrode plans were merged with postoperative CT scans to determine accuracy. Euclidean distance between the planned and actual trajectories was calculated using a 3D coordinate system at both the entry and target points for each electrode.

Results

Sixty-three electrodes were placed among four patients. Mean skull thickness at electrode entry sites was 2.34 mm. The mean difference between the planned and actual entry points was 1.12 mm, and the mean difference between the planned and actual target points was 1.73 mm. No significant correlation was observed between planned and actual target points and skull thickness (Pearson R =  − 0.170). No perioperative or postoperative complications were observed.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that SEEG can be safe and accurate in children under two years of age despite thin skulls. SEEG should be considered for young children with DRE, and age and skull thickness are not definite contraindications to the surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Raw data for these patients were generated using the ROSA One Brain system. Raw and derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (CRM) upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Taussig D, Chipaux M, Fohlen M, Dorison N, Bekaert O, Ferrand-Sorbets S et al (2020) Invasive evaluation in children (SEEG vs subdural grids). Seizure 77:43–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yan H, Katz JS, Anderson M, Mansouri A, Remick M, Ibrahim GM et al (2019) Method of invasive monitoring in epilepsy surgery and seizure freedom and morbidity: a systematic review. Epilepsia 60:1960–1972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mullin JP, Shriver M, Alomar S, Najm I, Bulacio J, Chauvel P et al (2016) Is SEEG safe? A systematic review and meta-analysis of stereo-electroencephalography-related complications. Epilepsia 57:386–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. van Lindert EJ, Arts S, Blok LM, Hendriks MP, Tielens L, van Bilsen M et al (2016) Intraoperative complications in pediatric neurosurgery: review of 1807 cases. J Neurosurg Pediatr 18:363–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berry C, Sandberg DI, Hoh DJ, Krieger MD, McComb JG (2008) Use of cranial fixation pins in pediatric neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 62(4):913–8; discussion 918–9. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000318177.95288.cb. PMID: 18496197

  6. van Lindert EJ, Delye H, Leonardo J (2014) Prospective review of a single center’s general pediatric neurosurgical intraoperative and postoperative complication rates. J Neurosurg Pediatr 13:107–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Benedictis A, Trezza A, Carai A, Genovese E, Procaccini E, Messina R et al (2017) Robot-assisted procedures in pediatric neurosurgery. Neurosurg Focus 42:E7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ho AL, Muftuoglu Y, Pendharkar AV, Sussman ES, Porter BE, Halpern CH et al (2018) Robot-guided pediatric stereoelectroencephalography: single-institution experience. J Neurosurg Pediatr 22:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guénot M, Lebas A, Devaux B, Colnat-Coulbois S, Dorfmuller G, McGonigal A et al (2018) Surgical technique. Neurophysiol Clin 48:39–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gonzalez-Martinez J, Najm IM (2014) Indications and selection criteria for invasive monitoring in children with cortical dysplasia. Childs Nerv Syst 30:1823–1829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alexander H, Fayed I, Oluigbo CO (2020) Rigid cranial fixation for robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography in toddlers: technical considerations. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 18:614–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stone S, Madsen JR, Bolton J, Pearl PL, Chavakula V, Day E (2021) A standardized electrode nomenclature for stereoelectroencephalography applications. J Clin Neurophysiol 38:509–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. González-Martínez J, Bulacio J, Thompson S, Gale J, Smithason S, Najm I et al (2016) Technique, results, and complications related to robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography. Neurosurgery 78:169–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sacino MF, Huang SS, Schreiber J, Gaillard WD, Oluigbo CO (2019) Is the use of stereotactic electroencephalography safe and effective in children? A meta-analysis of the use of stereotactic electroencephalography in comparison to subdural grids for invasive epilepsy monitoring in pediatric subjects. Neurosurgery 84:1190–1200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bourdillon P, Cucherat M, Isnard J, Ostrowsky-Coste K, Catenoix H, Guénot M et al (2018) Stereo-electroencephalography-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation in patients with focal epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsia 59:2296–2304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CM, PM, and SW conceived and designed the study. CM and JD generated the data used in the study. JD and CB performed data extraction and analysis. CM, JD, and CB prepared figures and tables. JD, CM and CB wrote the drafts of the manuscript. All authors edited the manuscript and tables. CM, JD and CB prepared the manuscript and associated files for submission. CM and JD equally contributed to the conduct of the study. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carrie R. Muh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

CM reports honoraria from LivaNova and Monteris, participation as a Scientific Advisory Board member for Anuncia, and participation as an investigator in a clinical trial for NeuroPace. SW and PM report honoraria from LivaNova, Eisai, UCB, Sunovion, Greenwich Pharmaceuticals, and participation as investigators in clinical trials for Zogenix, GW Pharma, NeuroPace, Neurelis, UCB, Eisai. SW also reports speaker fees from Marinus. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Co-first authors Dr. Muh and Ms. Dorilio were equally responsible for the work described in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muh, C.R., Dorilio, J.R., Beaudreault, C.P. et al. Feasibility and safety of stereoelectroencephalography in young children. Childs Nerv Syst 40, 1331–1337 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-024-06335-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-024-06335-6

Keywords

Navigation