Skip to main content
Log in

Robotic alignment system Cirq (Brainlab) for navigated brain tumor biopsies in children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The Cirq robotic alignment system (Brainlab, Munich, Germany) is a manually adjustable electronic arm with a robotic alignment module on its distal end, enabling the neurosurgeon to automatically and accurately align surgical instruments to a preoperatively planned trajectory. In this study, we share our first experiences and results using Cirq for intracranial tumor biopsy in children.

Methods

From May 2021 until October 2022, all consecutive patients that underwent a brain tumor biopsy using Cirq were included and compared to a historical cohort of patients biopsied with the non-robotic system Varioguide (Brainlab, Munich, Germany). Patient-related data, tumor-related data, and surgery-related data were collected. Registration accuracy was calculated for different patient-to-image registration methods. Pre- and postoperative images were fused, and entry error, target error, and angulation error were calculated.

Results

Thirty-seven patients, aged 1–19 years, were included (14 with Cirq and 23 with Varioguide). An integrated histopathological and molecular diagnosis was acquired in all cases. Patient-to-image registration was significantly more accurate when based on bone screw fiducials combined with intraoperative CT, as compared to surface matching or skin fiducials. The target error (Euclidian distance) was 5.3 mm for Cirq as compared to 8.3 mm for Varioguide, but this was not statistically significant. Entry error and angulation error were also not significantly different between both groups.

Conclusion

Intracranial biopsy with the Cirq robotic system is feasible and safe, and its accuracy does not differ from the Varioguide system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Please contact the corresponding author for access to our data.

References

  1. Philipp LR, Matias CM, Thalheimer S, Mehta SH, Sharan A, Wu C (2021) Robot-assisted stereotaxy reduces target error: A meta-analysis and meta-regression of 6056 trajectories. Neurosurgery 88(2):222+. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyaa428

  2. Marcus HJ, Vakharia VN, Ourselin S, Duncan J, Tisdall M, Aquilina K (2018) Robot-assisted stereotactic brain biopsy: Systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Childs Nerv Syst 34:1299–1309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-018-3821-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Krieg SM, Meyer B (2018) First experience with the jump-starting robotic assistance device Cirq. Neurosurg Focus 45(videosuppl1):V3. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.7.FocusVid.18108

  4. Farah K, Meyer M, Prost S, Dufour H, Blondel B, Fuentes S (2020) Cirq® robotic assistance for minimally invasive C1-C2 posterior instrumentation: Report on feasibility and safety. Oper Neurosurg 19(6):730+. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opaa208

  5. Farah K, Meyer M, Prost S, Albader F, Dufour H, Blondel B et al (2021) Robotic assistance for minimally invasive cervical pedicle instrumentation: Report on feasibility and safety. World Neurosurg 150:777–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.03.150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chesney K, Triano M, Dowlati E, Zhang I, Felbaum DR, Aulisi EF (2022) Cirq robotic arm-assisted transpedicular instrumentation with intraoperative navigation: Technical note and case series with 714 thoracolumbar screws. J Robot Surg 16:893–898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01313-5

  7. Pojskić M, Bopp M, Nimsky C, Carl B, Saβ B (2021) Initial intraoperative experience with robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement with Cirq® robotic alignment: An evaluation of the first 70 screws. J Clin Med 10:5725. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245725

  8. Lu VM, Koester SW, Di L, Elarjani T, Luther EM, Eichberg DG et al (2022) Frameless robotic-assisted biopsy of pediatric brainstem lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety. World Neurosurg 169:87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.10.071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson EM, Anderson GJ, Roberts CM, Hunt MA, Selden NR (2011) Skull-fixated fiducial markers improve accuracy in staged frameless stereotactic epilepsy surgery in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr 7:116–119. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.10.PEDS10352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu Q, Mao Z, Wang J, Wang C, Chen W, Chen W et al (2022) The accuracy of a novel self-tapping bone fiducial marker for frameless robot-assisted stereo-electro-encephalography implantation and registration techniques. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg MRCAS e2479. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.10.PEDS10352

  11. Woerdeman PA, Willems PWA, Noordmans HJ, Tulleken CAF, van der Sprenkel JWB (2007) Application accuracy in frameless image-guided neurosurgery: A comparison study of three patient-to-image registration methods. J Neurosurg 106:1012–1016. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2007.106.6.1012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dawes W, Marcus HJ, Tisdall M, Aquilina K (2019) Robot-assisted stereotactic brainstem biopsy in children: Prospective cohort study. J Robot Surg 13:575–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0899-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Coca HA, Cebula H, Benmekhbi M, Chenard MP, Entz-Werle N, Proust F (2016) Diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas in children: Interest of robotic frameless assisted biopsy. A technical note. Neurochirurgie 62:327–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2016.07.005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carai A, Mastronuzzi A, De Benedictis A, Messina R, Cacchione A et al (2017) Robot-assisted stereotactic biopsy of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: A single-center experience. World Neurosurg 101:584–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lefranc M, Capel C, Pruvot-Occean AS, Fichten A, Desenclos C et al (2015) Frameless robotic stereotactic biopsies: A consecutive series of 100 cases. J Neurosurg 122:342–352. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.9.JNS14107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bekelis K, Radwan TA, Desai A, Roberts DW (2012) Frameless robotically targeted stereotactic brain biopsy: Feasibility, diagnostic yield and safety. J Neurosurg 116:1002–1006. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.1.JNS111746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KvB and DW wrote the main manuscript text and made all figures. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript and contributed in data collection.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirsten M. van Baarsen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The research was approved by our Biobank and Data Access Committee under number PMCLAB2022.302.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The Cirq robotic arm was generously donated by the Semmy Foundation (Stichting Semmy) for children with brainstem tumors. Brainlab was not involved in preparation of this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Part of this work has been presented as a poster presentation on Society of Neuro Oncology, virtual conference on Intraoperative Visualization and the Connectome, 6–7 December 2021. 

Part of this work has been presented as a poster presentation on the International Society for Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (ISPNO) conference, Hamburg, 12–15 June 2022. 

Part of this work has been presented as an oral presentation on the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) pre-congress for students, Belgrade, 15 October 2022.  

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 18 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Baarsen, K.M., Woodley, D.E.A., Slot, K. et al. Robotic alignment system Cirq (Brainlab) for navigated brain tumor biopsies in children. Childs Nerv Syst 40, 99–108 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-023-06060-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-023-06060-6

Keywords

Navigation