Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Answer to Lynøe: Interesting data about confessions and abusive head trauma, but suboptimal analysis

  • Reply
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The authors of the cited paper respond to the critics formulated by a Swedish leading expert regarding methodology shortcomings of our study “Confessed versus denied inflicted head injuries in infants: similarities and differences.” They admit some methodological limitations but maintain their conclusions that the diagnosis was correct in the confession and denial groups and that the denial was more difficult in the more severe cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Vinchon M, Karnoub MA, Noulé N, Lampin ME (2022) Confessed versus denied inflicted head injuries in infants: similarities and differences. Childs Nerv Syst 38(1):147–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-021-05381-8 (Epub 2021 Oct 4 PMID: 34608530)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lynøe N, Elinder G, Hallberg B, Rosén M, Sundgren P, Eriksson A (2017) Insufficient evidence for ‘shaken baby syndrome’ - a systematic review. Acta Paediatr 106:1021–1027. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.13760 (Epub 2017 Mar 1 PMID: 28130787)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Finnie JW, Blumbergs PC, Manavis J, Turner RJ, Helps S, Vink R, Byard RW, Chidlow G, Sandoz B, Dutschke J, Anderson RW (2012) Neuropathological changes in a lamb model of non-accidental head injury (the shaken baby syndrome). J Clin Neurosci 19(8):1159–1164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2011.12.019 (Epub 2012 Jun 15 PMID: 22705132)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Roth S, Raul JS, Ludes B, Willinger R (2007) Finite element analysis of impact and shaking inflicted to a child. Int J Legal Med 121(3):223–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-006-0129-3 (Epub 2006 Nov 8 PMID: 17091312)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Adamsbaum C, Rambaud C (2012) Abusive head trauma: don’t overlook bridging vein thrombosis. Pediatr Radiol 42(11):1298–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2434-y (Epub 2012 Aug 12 PMID: 22885602)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rambaud C (2015) Bridging veins and autopsy findings in abusive head trauma. Pediatr Radiol 45(8):1126–1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3285-0 (Epub 2015 Feb 20 PMID: 25698365)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthieu Vinchon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vinchon, M., Karnoub, MA., Noulé, N. et al. Answer to Lynøe: Interesting data about confessions and abusive head trauma, but suboptimal analysis. Childs Nerv Syst 38, 871–872 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-022-05509-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-022-05509-4

Navigation