Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Political rhetoric is no substitute for objective scientific data

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Vinchon M et al (2021) The legal challenges to the diagnosis of shaken baby syndrome or how to counter 12 common fake news. Child’s Nervous System. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-021-05357-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Caffey J (1974) The whiplash shaken infant syndrome: manual shaking by the extremities with whiplash-induced intracranial and intraocular bleedings, linked with residual permanent brain damage and mental retardation. Pediatrics 54(4):396–403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Caffey J (1972) On the theory and practice of shaking infants. Its potential residual effects of permanent brain damage and mental retardation. American Journal of Diseases of Children 124(2):161–169

  4. Caffey J (1965) Significance of the history in the diagnosis of traumatic injury to children. J Pediatr 67(5):1008–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vinchon M, Defoort-Dhellemmes S, Desurmont M, Dhellemmes P (2005) Accidental and nonaccidental head injuries ininfants: a prospective study. J Neurosurg 102:380–384

  6. Vinchon M, Noizet O, Defoort-Dhellemmes S, Soto-Ares S, Dhellemmes P (2002) Infantile subdural hematomas due to traffic accidents. Pediatr Neurosurg 37:245–253. https://doi.org/10.1159/000066216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vinchon M, Desurmont M, Soto-Ares G, De Foort-Dhellemmes S (2010) Natural history of traumatic meningeal bleeding in infants: semiquantitative analysis of serial CT scans in corroborated cases. Childs Nerv Syst 26:755–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-009-1047-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Response to Lyn∅e: questions about isolated trauma shaking and confessions, Childs Nerv Syst, (2017) 33:1423–1424. DOI. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-017-3516-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no funding and no competing interests. Both have given evidence in cases of alleged inflicted head trauma.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Squier, W., Mack, J. Political rhetoric is no substitute for objective scientific data. Childs Nerv Syst 38, 7–8 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-021-05407-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-021-05407-1

Navigation