Abstract
Purpose
The most frequent impact sites for head injury patients who require surgical intervention are the temporo-parietal regions. However, most recent guidelines for indication of neuroimaging for head injury sparsely address the impact site as a risk factor. Our purpose was to determine the association between the site of impact in a minor mechanism pediatric head injury and neurosurgical intervention.
Method
A retrospective cohort study of head injury patients seen between 2000 and 2016 in a large trauma center was carried out. We looked at all children ages 0–18 years who underwent neurosurgical intervention for head traumas. A major mechanism was defined as a fall of >1 m, being struck by a fast-flying object, or a motor collision involving an estimated speed of >40 kph. All other mechanisms were classified as minor.
Results
Out of 533 patients, we excluded patients with non-accidental trauma, patients with a relevant chronic illness, patients with a major mechanism of injury, and patients with missing important data, leaving 43 as the study group. Of the 43 patients with a minor mechanism, none had a site of impact that was outside the temporo-parietal region.
Conclusion
We studied one of the largest cohorts of pediatric patients undergoing neurosurgical intervention for a head injury. In our cohort, none of the children who sustained a minor mechanism of injury suffered a site of impact in the occipital or frontal bone regions outside the temple region. These data suggest that injury location should be considered in assessing the need for neuroimaging in minor mechanism head trauma patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Astrand R, Rosenlund C, Undén J (2016) Scandinavian guidelines for initial management of minor and moderate head trauma in children. BMC Med 14:33
Babl FE, Borland ML, Phillips N, Kochar A, Dalton S, McCaskill M, Cheek JA, Gilhotra Y, Furyk J, Neutze J, Lyttle MD, Bressan S, Donath S, Molesworth C, Jachno K, Ward B, Williams A, Baylis A, Crowe L, Oakley E, Dalziel SR, Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) (2017) Accuracy of PECARN, CATCH, and CHALICE head injury decision rules in children: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 389(10087):2393–2402
Blakely TA Jr, Harrington DE (1993) Mild head injury is not always mild; implications for damage litigation. Med Sci Law 33(3):231–242
Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176(2):289–296
Brody AS, Frush DP, Huda W, Brent RL (2007) Radiation risk to children from computed tomography. Pediatric 120(3):677–682
Da Dalt L, Marchi AG, Laudizi L, Crichiutti G, Messi G, Pavanello L et al (2006) Predictors of intracranial injuries in children after blunt head trauma. Eur J Pediatr 165(3):142–148
Dunning J, Daly JP, Lomas J-P, Lecky F, Batchelor J, Mackway-Jones K (2006) Derivation of the children’s head injury algorithm for the prediction of important clinical events decision rule for head injury in children. Arch Dis Child 91(11):885–891
Gallagher JP, Browder EJ (1968) Extradural hematoma, experience with 167 patients. J Neurosurg 29(1):1–12
Greenes DS, Schutzman SA (1998) Occult intracranial injury in infants. Ann Emerg Med 32(6):680–686
Kuppermann N, Holmes JF, Dayan PS, Hoyle JD, Atabaki SM, Holubkov R et al (2009) Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 374(9696):1160–1170
Mahinda H, Murti O (2009) Variability in thickness of human skull bones and sternum—an autopsy experience. J Forensic Med Toxicol 26(2):26–31
McLaurin RL, Ford LE (1964) Extradural hematoma statistical survey of 47 cases. J Neurosurg 21(5):364–371
NICE guidelines (n.d.). Head injury: assessment and early management. Clinical guideline [CG176] Published date: January 3014. Last updated Sept 2019, https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg176. Accessed 01 Dec 2019
Osmond MH, Klassen TP, Wells GA, Correll R, Jarvis A, Joubert G, Bailey B, Chauvin-Kimoff L, Pusic M, McConnell D, Nijssen-Jordan C, Silver N, Taylor B, Stiell IG, Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC) Head Injury Study Group (2010) CATCH: a clinical decision rule for the use of computed tomography in children with minor head injury. CMAJ 182(4):341–348
Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP, Howe NL, Ronckers CM, Rajaraman P, Sir Craft AW, Parker L, Berrington de González A (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380(9840):499–505
Rogers AJ, Kuppermann N (2013) Incidental findings in children with blunt head trauma evaluated with cranial CT scans. Pediatrics 132(2):e356–e363
Schonfeld D, Bressan S, Da Dalt L, Henien MN, Winnett JA, Nigrovic LE (2014) Pediatric emergency care applied research network head injury clinical prediction rules are reliable in practice. Arch Dis Child 99(5):427–431
Schutzman SA, Barnes P, Duhaime AC, Greenes D, Homer C, Jaffe D, Lewis RJ, Luerssen TG, Schunk J (2001) Evaluation and management of children younger than two years old with apparently minor head trauma: proposed guidelines. Pediatrics 107(5):983–993
Schutzman SA, Greenes DS (2001) Pediatric minor head trauma. Ann Emerg Med 37(1):65–74
Smits M (2007) Minor head injury: guidelines for the use of CT—a multicenter validation study. Radiology 245(3):831–838
Thiam DW, Yap SH, Chong SL (2015) Clinical decision rules for pediatric minor head injury: are CT scans a necessary evil? Ann Acad Med Singap 44(9):335–341
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Shiri Diskin, PhD, for her significant editing contribution.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Dr. Tavor had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Concept and design: Glatstein, Kulkarni, Tavor, Scolnik
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors
Drafting of the manuscript: Tavor, Scolnik
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors
Administrative, technical, or material support: Tavor, Boddu, Lamberti
Supervision: Scolnik, Kulkarni
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
This retrospective chart review study involving human participants was in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Human Investigation Committee (IRB) of the University of Toronto approved this study.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tavor, O., Boddu, S., Glatstein, M. et al. The importance of skull impact site for minor mechanism head injury requiring neurosurgical intervention. Childs Nerv Syst 36, 3021–3025 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-020-04612-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-020-04612-8