Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do junctional neural tube defect and segmental spinal dysgenesis have the same pathoembryological background?

  • Invited Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Junctional neural tube defect (JNTD) is a recently introduced form of congenital spinal dysraphism that is characterized by functional disconnection between the primary and secondary neural tubes. The upper and lower cords appeared to be connected by a non-functioning band-like structure. JNTD is suspected to arise from a developmental error not corresponding to either primary or secondary neurulation, but rather between the two neurulation processes. On the other hand, segmental spinal dysgenesis (SSD) is an older entity of spinal anomalies in which a segment of the spine and spinal cord does not develop properly. The anomaly had been noted for the bony abnormality, as it is the most prominent feature. Based on the recent encounter of two cases resembling both entities, we sought the possibility that the two diseases may have the same pathoembryogenesis.

Methods and results

Based on the impression that the two entities share important features, we compared the details of the two anomalies. First, our two recently encountered cases of JNTD were described. Second, previous reports of SSD were comprehensively reviewed. The two cases had the essential anomaly of the neural structures satisfying the definition of JNTD, as well as the elaborate spinal deformity as seen in SSD. In the previous literature on SSD, it was recognized that in addition to the bone anomaly, disconnected spinal cord was present. Hence, the two entities seem to have many similar clinical and neuroimaging features. The dysgenic spinal level is similar, and the disconnection between the primary and secondary neural tubes is found in the two diseases. The two neural tubes are connected by a band-like structure, with severe stenosis of the spinal canal at the level of the band. Both entities show segmental anomalies of the vertebrae in the thoracolumbar region, especially in the posterior element. Although the extent of shared features seems high, the previously suggested hypothetical pathoembryogenesis of SSD did not involve the process of junctional neurulation. We suggest that SSD shares the same origin as JNTD, and the bony abnormality may be a secondary phenomenon to the core error during neural tube development.

Conclusions

We propose that JNTD and SSD may be the same entity, originating from an error during junctional neurulation. As there is controversy regarding the treatment strategy for both entities, unified accumulation of clinical experience and analysis may help improve the management of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eibach S, Moes G, Hou YJ, Zovickian J, Pang D (2017) Unjoined primary and secondary neural tubes: junctional neural tube defect, a new form of spinal dysraphism caused by disturbance of junctional neurulation. Childs Nerv Syst 33:1633–1647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Florea SM, Faure A, Brunel H, Girard N, Scavarda D (2018) A case of junctional neural tube defect associated with a lipoma of the filum terminale: a new subtype of junctional neural tube defect? J Neurosurg Pediatr 21:601–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schmidt C, Voin V, Iwanaga J, Alonso F, Oskouian RJ, Topale N, Tubbs RS, Oakes WJ (2017) Junctional neural tube defect in a newborn: report of a fourth case. Childs Nerv Syst 33:873–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Scott RM, Wolpert SM, Bartoshesky LE, Zimbler S, Karlin L (1988) Segmental spinal dysgenesis. Neurosurgery 22:739–744

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Faciszewski T, Winter RB, Lonstein JE, Sane S, Erickson D (1995) Segmental spinal dysgenesis. A disorder different from spinal agenesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:530–537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Flynn JM, Otsuka NY, Emans JB, Hall JE, Hresko MT (1997) Segmental spinal dysgenesis: early neurologic deterioration and treatment. J Pediatr Orthop 17:100–104

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ford EG, Jaufmann BA, Kaste SC, Foody LJ, Kuivila TE (1996) Successful staged surgical correction of congenital segmental spinal dysgenesis and complete rotary subluxation of the thoracolumbar spine in an infant. J Pediatr Surg 31:960–964

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hughes LO, McCarthy RE, Glasier CM (1998) Segmental spinal dysgenesis: a report of three cases. J Pediatr Orthop 18:227–232

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bristol RE, Theodore N, Rekate HL (2007) Segmental spinal dysgenesis: report of four cases and proposed management strategy. Childs Nerv Syst 23:359–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cacciola F, Lippa L (2017) Segmental spinal dysgenesis associated with occult dysraphism: considerations on management strategies. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 8:144–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Desai K, Nadkarni T, Bhayani R, Goel A (2003) Congenital thoracic cord segmental amyelia: a rare manifestation of segmental spinal dysgenesis. Pediatr Neurosurg 38:102–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Morell SM, McCarthy RE, Ocal E (2017) Segmental spinal dysgenesis: a report of early surgical intervention and outcome in a 14-month-old child. Childs Nerv Syst 33:381–384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ofiram E, Winter RB, Lonstein JE (2006) Segmental spinal dysgenesis: case report of a 50-year follow-up after surgery at age 3 years: case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:E59–E61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tortori-Donati P, Fondelli MP, Rossi A, Raybaud CA, Cama A, Capra V (1999) Segmental spinal dysgenesis: neuroradiologic findings with clinical and embryologic correlation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:445–456

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pavlova OM, Ryabykh SO, Kozyrev DA, Gubin AV (2017) Surgical treatment of thoracolumbar segmental spinal dysgenesis: optimal type of fusion. World Neurosurg 106:551–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Buyse G, Van Calenbergh F, Choux M, Demaerel P, Sciot R, Verpoorten C (2003) Segmental spinal cord hypoplasia and meningocele with preservation of medullary function: case report. Surg Neurol 59:505–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Emmanouilidou M, Chondromatidou S, Arvaniti M, Goutsaridou F, Papapostolou P, Tsitouridis I (2008) Spinal segmental dysgenesis: presentation of a rare spinal congenital abnormality. Neuroradiol J 21:388–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fratelli N, Rich P, Jeffrey I, Bahmaie A, Thilaganathan B, Papageorghiou AT (2007) Prenatal diagnosis of segmental spinal dysgenesis. Prenat Diagn 27:979–981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tokudome K, Ito S, Kato T, Yanase T, Kawarasaki T, Moritomo Y (2017) Segmental spinal dysgenesis with caudal agenesis in a Holstein calf. J Vet Med Sci 79:277–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Valdez Quintana M, Michaud J, El-Chaar D, El Demellawy D, Nikkel SM, Miller E (2016) Fetal segmental spinal dysgenesis and unusual segmental agenesis of the anterior spinal artery. Childs Nerv Syst 32:1537–1541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zana E, Chalard F, Mazda K, Sebag G (2005) An atypical case of segmental spinal dysgenesis. Pediatr Radiol 35:914–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dady A, Havis E, Escriou V, Catala M, Duband JL (2014) Junctional neurulation: a unique developmental program shaping a discrete region of the spinal cord highly susceptible to neural tube defects. J Neurosci 34:13208–13221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dias MS, Li V, Landi M, Schwend R, Grabb P (1998) The embryogenesis of congenital vertebral dislocation: early embryonic buckling? Pediatr Neurosurg 29:281–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Keynes RJ, Stern CD (1988) Mechanisms of vertebrate segmentation. Development 103:413–429

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaplan KM, Spivak JM, Bendo JA (2005) Embryology of the spine and associated congenital abnormalities. Spine J 5:564–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korean Government (MSIP)(NRF-2018R1A5A2025964). This work was also supported by Creative-pioneering Researchers Program through Seoul National University (SNU No. 800-20160282). This work was also supported by the Educational and Research Encouragement Fund of Seoul National University Hospital(J. Y. Lee).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ji Yeoun Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, KC., Lee, J.S., Kim, K. et al. Do junctional neural tube defect and segmental spinal dysgenesis have the same pathoembryological background?. Childs Nerv Syst 36, 241–250 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-019-04425-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-019-04425-4

Keywords

Navigation