Skip to main content
Log in

Consent in paediatric neurosurgery: adequacy of documentation and parental perspectives

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Consenting paediatric patients for surgical procedures remains inherently unique in that it is underpinned by principles such as parental responsibility, assessment of the child’s capacity to consent, and adherence to national/legal guidelines. Quality record keeping is an important objective evidence to demonstrate the highest standards of medical care provided to our patients. The consent form is a crucial medical record encapsulating the attainment of informed consent from a parent/guardian for performing a procedure on their child. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the consenting process in our department to assess adequacy of documentation and parental perspectives.

Methods

A prospective study using qualitative descriptive design was conducted with parents of 50 children requiring neurosurgical procedures over a 3-month period.

Results

All patients understood the primary diagnosis and type of surgery. Procedure-specific risks were understood by 98% and 84% could remember the mentioning of general risks of surgery. Only a minority of parents (24%) could recollect that alternative options of management including no treatment were discussed. In cases where relevant, laterality was only documented in 56% of consent forms. All patients felt that an informed decision regarding consent to surgery was made. However, 12% suggested areas where further improvement could be made in the timing of consent and the way information could be better provided.

Discussion

Consent is more than a signature on a form. It provides objective evidence of a shared decision-making process between the surgeon, patient, and their parent/guardian. Our initial study highlights multiple areas for improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. GMC (2008) Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together. General Medical Council (GMC), London

    Google Scholar 

  2. GMC (2007) 0–18 guidance for all doctors. General Medical Council (GMC), London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Royal College of Surgeons (2014) RCoSoE. Good surgical practice

  4. Department of Health (2001) Reference guide to consent for examination or treatment. Department of Health

  5. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR et al (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 360(5):491–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fenn P, Diacon S, Gray A, Hodges R, Rickman N (2000) Current cost of medical negligence in the NHS hospitals: analysis of claims database. Br Med J 320:1567–1571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Authority TNL (2013) Factsheet 3: information on claims. The NHS Litigation Authority

  8. De Lourdes Levy M, Larcher V, Kurz R (2003) Informed consent/assent in children. Statement of Ethics Working Group of the Conferation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP). Eur J Pediatr 162:629–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schmitz D, Reinacher PC (2006) Informed consent in neurosurgery - translating ethical theory into action. J Med Ethics 32:497–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cocanour CS (2017) Informed consent - it’s more than a signature on a piece of paper. Am J Surg 214(6):993–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ellamushi HE, Khan R, Kitchen ND (2000) Consent to surgery in a high risk speciality: a prospective audit. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 82:213–216

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. The Medical Defence Union (1997) Consent to treatment. The Medical Defence Union, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. General Medical Council (1998) Seeking patients’ consent. General Medical Council, London

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hanson M, Pitt D (2017) Informed consent for surgery: risk discussion and documentation. Can J Surg 60(1):69–70

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Koller SE, Moore RF, Goldberg MB, Zhang J, Yu D, Conklin CB, Milner RE, Goldberg AJ (2017) An informed consent program enhances surgery resident education. J Surg Educ 74(5):906–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rhoton AL Jr (2003) Operative techniques and instrumentation for neurosurgery. Neurosurgery. 53:907–934. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000086737.96693.0F

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Desiderio Rodrigues.

Ethics declarations

The hospital internal audit review department sanctioned our study.

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 459 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silva, A.H.D., Wijesinghe, H., Mundil, N. et al. Consent in paediatric neurosurgery: adequacy of documentation and parental perspectives. Childs Nerv Syst 35, 2363–2369 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-019-04285-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-019-04285-y

Keywords

Navigation