The growth of the neurocranium: literature review and implications in cranial repair
- 217 Downloads
Postnatal growth of neurocranium is prevalently completed in the first years of life, thus deeply affecting the clinical presentation and surgical management of pediatric neurosurgical conditions involving the skull. This paper aims to review the pertinent literature on the normal growth of neurocranium and critically discuss the surgical implications of this factor in cranial repair.
A search of the electronic database of Pubmed was performed, using the key word “neurocranium growth”, thus obtaining 217 results. Forty-six papers dealing with this topic in humans, limited to the English language, were selected. After excluding a few papers dealing with viscerocranium growth or pathological conditions not related to normal neurocranium growth 18 papers were finally included into the present review.
Results and conclusions
The skull growth is very rapid in the first 2 years of life and approximates the adult volume by 7 years of age, with minimal further growth later on, which is warranted by the remodeling of the cranial bones. This factor affects the outcome of cranioplasty. Thus, it is essential to consider age in the planning phase of cranial repair, choice of the material, and critical comparison of results of different cranioplasty solutions.
KeywordsCranial growth Cranial repair Cranioplasty Neurocranium Precision medicine Skull growth
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no funding or conflict of interest to disclose.
- 6.Di Rocco C, Frassamito P, Pelo S, Tamburrini G (2015) Syndromic craniosynostosis. Pediatr. Neurosurg. Tricks of the Trade Enlow DH (1979) facial growth and development. Int J Oral Myol 5(4):7–10Google Scholar
- 11.Frassanito P, Massimi L, Tamburrini G, Bianchi F, Nataloni A, Canella V, Caldarelli M (2018) Custom-made hydroxyapatite for cranial repair in a specific pediatric age group (7-13 years old): a multicenter post-marketing surveillance study. Childs Nerv Syst 34:2283–2289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-018-3905-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Imai K, Tajima S (1991) The growth patterns of normal skull by using CT scans and their clinical applications for preoperative planning and postoperative follow-up in craniofacial surgery. Eur J Plast Surg 14(2):80-84Google Scholar
- 17.Lichtenberg R (1960) Radiographie du crane de 226 enfants normaux de la naissance à 8 ans: Impressions digitiformes, capacité, angles et indices. Thesis, University of Paris.Google Scholar
- 18.Manjunath KY (2002) Estimation of cranial volume-an overview of methodologies. J Anat Soc India 51(1):85-91Google Scholar
- 19.Martin KD, Franz B, Kirsch M, Polanski W, von der Hagen M, Schackert G, Sobottka SB (2014) Autologous bone flap cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy is combined with a high complication rate in pediatric traumatic brain injury patients. Acta Neurochir 156(4):813–824CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Rocque BG, Agee BS, Thompson EM, Piedra M, Baird LC, Selden NR, Greene S, Deibert CP, Hankinson TC, Lew SM, Iskandar BJ, Bragg TM, Frim D, Grant G, Gupta N, Auguste KI, Nikas DC, Vassilyadi M, Muh CR, Wetjen NM, Lam SK (2018) Complications following pediatric cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a multicenter retrospective study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 22(3):225–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Guo SS, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Mei Z, Wei R, Curtin LR, Roche AF, & Johnson CL (2002) 2000 CDC growth charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital Health Stat 11(246):1-190Google Scholar
- 27.Williams PL, Warwick R (1980) Gray’s anatomy, 36th British edn. W.B. Saunders Co/Churchill Livingstone, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar