Child's Nervous System

, Volume 34, Issue 5, pp 919–923 | Cite as

Shunt revision rates in myelomeningocele patients in the first year of life: a retrospective study of 52 patients

  • Ibrahim Alatas
  • Gokhan Canaz
  • Nesrin Akkoyun Kayran
  • Nursu Kara
  • Huseyin Canaz
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

Shunt placement indications are stringent and require confirmation of clinical and radiological evidence of hydrocephalus (HC). The aim of this study was to determine the rate of shunting and discuss the outcome in the first year of life in patients with myelomeningocele (MMC) on the basis of review of the literature.

Methods

All patients who underwent postnatal repair of MMC at our institution between March 2014 and March 2015 were evaluated. Patients were only included if they underwent both MMC repair and ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt insertion at our institution and were followed up for at least 12 months. The mean ages for repair of MMC, MMC levels, timing of VP shunt placement, shunt revisions, and causes of shunt revisions were documented.

Results

Fifty-two patients with MMC were included in this study. The average gestational age at birth was 38 weeks. The level of MMC was thoracolumbar in 13 cases, 11 times lumbar, 21 times lumbosacral, and 7 times sacral. Thirty-one patients (59.61%) suffered from hydrocephalus and required placement of a shunt. When we evaluate the lesion levels of patients who require shunting, 13 cases were thoracolumbar, 6 cases were lumbar, and 11 cases were lumbosacral. None of the sacral cases needed VP shunt. Seven patients (13.4%) had shunt revision within the first year of life. The cause of shunt revision was wound problem in one patient (1.9%), underdrainage in two patients (3.8%), infection in three patients (5.7%), and mechanical obstruction in another one patient (1.9%).

Conclusion

MMC closure and management of the associated HC are one of the most basic, but never simple, legs of the pediatric neurosurgery around the world. As clinicians and neurosurgeons, we are obligated to analyze recent evidences and evaluate present approaches to achieve optimization in this subject until further technologies or approaches became more advantageous for our patients.

Keywords

Hydrocephalus Myelomeningocele Shunt Revision 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Tulipan N, Sutton LN, Bruner JP, Cohen BM, Johnson M, Adzick NS (2003) The effect of intrauterine myelomeningocele repair on the incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg 38(1):27–33.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000067560 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Botto LD, Lisi A, Robert-Gnansia E, Erickson JD, Vollset SE, Mastroiacovo P, Botting B, Cocchi G, de Vigan C, de Walle H, Feijoo M, Irgens LM, McDonnell B, Merlob P, Ritvanen A, Scarano G, Siffel C, Metneki J, Stoll C, Smithells R, Goujard J (2005) International retrospective cohort study of neural tube defects in relation to folic acid recommendations: are the recommendations working? BMJ 330(7491):571–570.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38336.664352.82 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alatas I, Demirci H, Canaz H, Akdemir O, Baydin S, Ozel K (2015) The role of urodynamic studies in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with spina bifida. Asian J neurosurgery 10(2):83–86.  https://doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.154872 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rintoul NE, Sutton LN, Hubbard AM, Cohen B, Melchionni J, Pasquariello PS, Adzick NS (2002) A new look at myelomeningoceles: functional level, vertebral level, shunting, and the implications for fetal intervention. Pediatrics 109(3):409–413.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.109.3.409 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Steinbok P, Irvine B, Cochrane DD, Irwin BJ (1992) Long-term outcome and complications of children born with meningomyelocele. Child’s Nervous System: ChNS: Official J Int Society Pediatric Neurosurgery 8(2):92–96.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00298448 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Adzick NS, Thom EA, Spong CY, Brock JW 3rd, Burrows PK, Johnson MP, Howell LJ, Farrell JA, Dabrowiak ME, Sutton LN et al (2011) A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med 364(11):993–1004.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1014379 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chakraborty A, Crimmins D, Hayward R, Thompson D (2008) Toward reducing shunt placement rates in patients with myelomeningocele. J Neurosurg Pediatr 1(5):361–365.  https://doi.org/10.3171/PED/2008/1/5/361 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bowman RM, McLone DG, Grant JA, Tomita T, Ito JA (2001) Spina bifida outcome: a 25-year prospective. Pediatr Neurosurg 34(3):114–120.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000056005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hetherington R, Dennis M, Barnes M, Drake J, Gentili F (2006) Functional outcome in young adults with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. Child’s Nervous System: ChNS: Official J Int Society Pediatric Neurosurgery 22(2):117–124.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-005-1231-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wills KE, Holmbeck GN, Dillon K, McLone DG (1990) Intelligence and achievement in children with myelomeningocele. J Pediatr Psychol 15(2):161–176.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/15.2.161 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Phillips BC, Gelsomino M, Pownall AL, Ocal E, Spencer HJ, O’Brien MS, Albert GW (2014) Predictors of the need for cerebrospinal fluid diversion in patients with myelomeningocele. J Neurosurg Pediatr 14(2):167–172.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.4.PEDS13470 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bowman RM, McLone DG (2010) Neurosurgical management of spina bifida: research issues. Developmental Disabilities Res Reviews 16(1):82–87.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ddrr.100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wakhlu A, Ansari NA (2004) The prediction of postoperative hydrocephalus in patients with spina bifida. Child’s Nervous System: ChNS: Official J Int Society Pediatric Neurosurgery 20(2):104–106.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-003-0849-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Melo JR, Pacheco P, Melo EN, Vasconcellos A, Passos RK (2015) Clinical and ultrasonographic criteria for using ventriculoperitoneal shunts in newborns with myelomeningocele. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 73(9):759–763.  https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X20150110 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rodrigues AB, Krebs VL, Matushita H, de Carvalho WB (2016) Short-term prognostic factors in myelomeningocele patients. Child’s Nervous System: ChNS: Official J Int Society Pediatric Neurosurgery 32(4):675–680.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-016-3012-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sinha SK, Dhua A, Mathur MK, Singh S, Modi M, Ratan SK (2012) Neural tube defect repair and ventriculoperitoneal shunting: indications and outcome. J Neonatal Surgery 1(2):21Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Januschek E, Rohrig A, Kunze S, Fremerey C, Wiebe B, Messing-Junger M (2016) Myelomeningocele—a single institute analysis of the years 2007 to 2015. Child’s Nervous System: ChNS: Official J Int Society Pediatric Neurosurgery 32(7):1281–1287.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-016-3079-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vinchon M, Dhellemmes P (2006) Cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection: risk factors and long-term follow-up. Child’s Nervous System: ChNS: Official J Int Society Pediatric Neurosurgery 22(7):692–697.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-005-0037-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hanak BW, Bonow RH, Harris CA, Browd SR (2017) Cerebrospinal fluid shunting complications in children. Pediatr Neurosurg.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000452840
  20. 20.
    McGirt MJ, Leveque JC, Wellons JC 3rd, Villavicencio AT, Hopkins JS, Fuchs HE, George TM (2002) Cerebrospinal fluid shunt survival and etiology of failures: a seven-year institutional experience. Pediatr Neurosurg 36(5):248–255.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000058428 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Choux M, Genitori L, Lang D, Lena G (1992) Shunt implantation: reducing the incidence of shunt infection. J Neurosurg 77(6):875–880.  https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1992.77.6.0875 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Caldarelli M, Di Rocco C, La Marca F (1996) Shunt complications in the first postoperative year in children with meningomyelocele. Child’s Nervous System: ChNS: Official J Int Society Pediatric Neurosurgery 12(12):748–754.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00261592 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Machado HR, Santos de Oliveira R (2004) Simultaneous repair of myelomeningocele and shunt insertion. Child’s Nervous System: ChNS: Official J Int Society Pediatric Neurosurgery 20(2):107–109.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-003-0853-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Riva-Cambrin J, Kestle JR, Holubkov R, Butler J, Kulkarni AV, Drake J, Whitehead WE, Wellons JC 3rd, Shannon CN, Tamber MS et al (2016) Risk factors for shunt malfunction in pediatric hydrocephalus: a multicenter prospective cohort study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 17(4):382–390.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.6.PEDS14670 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Drake JM, Kestle JR, Milner R, Cinalli G, Boop F, Piatt J Jr, Haines S, Schiff SJ, Cochrane DD, Steinbok P et al (1998) Randomized trial of cerebrospinal fluid shunt valve design in pediatric hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 43(2):294–303; discussion 303-295.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199808000-00068 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gebert AF, Schulz M, Schwarz K, Thomale UW (2016) Long-term survival rates of gravity-assisted, adjustable differential pressure valves in infants with hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg Pediatr 17(5):544–551.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.10.PEDS15328 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pedreira DA, Zanon N, de Sa RA, Acacio GL, Ogeda E, Belem TM, Chmait RH, Kontopoulos E, Quintero RA (2014) Fetoscopic single-layer repair of open spina bifida using a cellulose patch: preliminary clinical experience. J Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine : Official J European Association Perinatal Medicine, Federation Asia Oceania Perinatal Societies, Int Society Perinatal Obstet 27(16):1613–1619.  https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2013.871701 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tulipan N, Wellons JC 3rd, Thom EA, Gupta N, Sutton LN, Burrows PK, Farmer D, Walsh W, Johnson MP, Rand L et al (2015) Prenatal surgery for myelomeningocele and the need for cerebrospinal fluid shunt placement. J Neurosurg Pediatr 16(6):613–620.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.7.PEDS15336 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Garabedian C, Di Rocco F, Fallet-Bianco C, Zerah M, Jouannic JM (2013) Prenatal repair of myelomeningocele: state of the art. J de Gynecologie, Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 42(3):227–231.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.10.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Alatas I, Canaz H, Ozel K, Gedikbasi A, Kohl T (2016) Repair of spina bifida aperta with percutaneous minimal invasive fetoscopic method: first two cases in Turkey. Perinatal J 24(1):54–60.  https://doi.org/10.2399/prn.16.0241010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ibrahim Alatas
    • 1
  • Gokhan Canaz
    • 2
  • Nesrin Akkoyun Kayran
    • 3
  • Nursu Kara
    • 4
  • Huseyin Canaz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Neurosurgery, Spina Bifida Center, Florence Nightingale HospitalIstanbul Bilim UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of NeurosurgeryBakirkoy Research and Training Hospital for Neurology, Neurosurgery and PsychiatryIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Department of NeurosurgeryKanuni Sultan Suleyman Research and Training HospitalIstanbulTurkey
  4. 4.Department of Neonatology, Florence Nightingale HospitalIstanbul Bilim UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations