Utility of plain radiographs and MRI in cervical spine clearance in symptomatic non-obtunded pediatric patients without high-impact trauma
- 369 Downloads
The optimal imaging modality for evaluating cervical spine trauma and optimizing management in the pediatric population is controversial. In pediatric populations, there are no well-established guidelines for cervical spine trauma evaluation and treatment. Currently, there is virtually no literature regarding imaging and management of symptomatic pediatric patients who present with cervical spine trauma without high-impact mechanism. This study aims to establish an optimal imaging strategy for this subgroup of trauma patients.
We performed a retrospective review of pediatric patients (aged below 18 years) who were admitted to Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia between July 2011 and June 2015, who did not suffer a high-impact trauma but were symptomatic for cervical spine injury following cervical trauma. Imaging and management strategies were reviewed and results compared.
Forty-seven pediatric patients were identified who met the inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 46 underwent cervical spine series (CSS) plain radiograph imaging. Thirty-four cases underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 9 patients underwent CT. MRI was able to detect 4 cases of ligamentous injury, which were not seen in CSS imaging and was able to facilitate cervical spine clearance in a further two patients whose CSS radiographs were abnormal.
In this study, MRI has a greater sensitivity and specificity when compared to CSS radiography in a symptomatic pediatric low-impact trauma population. Our data call in to question the routine use of CSS radiographs in children.
KeywordsPediatric Cervical spine Trauma Imaging Low impact Management
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.
No funding was received.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
- 1.Avellino AM, Mann FA, Grady MS et al (2005) The misdiagnosis of acute cervical spine injuries and fractures in infants and children: the 12-year experience of a level I pediatric and adult trauma center. Childs Nerv Syst ChNS Off J Int Soc Pediatr Neurosurg 21:122–127. doi: 10.1007/s00381-004-1058-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Dunham CM, Brocker BP, Collier BD, Gemmel DJ (2008) Risks associated with magnetic resonance imaging and cervical collar in comatose, blunt trauma patients with negative comprehensive cervical spine computed tomography and no apparent spinal deficit. Crit Care Lond Engl 12:R89. doi: 10.1186/cc6957 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Brockmeyer DL, Ragel BT, Kestle JRW (2012) The pediatric cervical spine instability study. A pilot study assessing the prognostic value of four imaging modalities in clearing the cervical spine for children with severe traumatic injuries. Childs Nerv Syst ChNS Off J Int Soc Pediatr Neurosurg 28:699–705. doi: 10.1007/s00381-012-1696-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Patel MB, Humble SS, Cullinane DC et al (2015) Cervical spine collar clearance in the obtunded adult blunt trauma patient: a systematic review and practice management guideline from the eastern Association for the Surgery of trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 78:430–441. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000503 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 22.Schoonjans F Diagnostic test evaluation calculator. In: MedCalc. https://www.medcalc.org/calc/diagnostic_test.php. Accessed 8 Feb 2016
- 34.Gargas J, Yaszay B, Kruk P et al (2013) An analysis of cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging findings after normal computed tomographic imaging findings in pediatric trauma patients: ten-year experience of a level I pediatric trauma center. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74:1102–1107. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182827139 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar