Skip to main content
Log in

The usage of the three-dimension distractor in the NAVID system for plagiocephaly—three case reports

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Distraction osteogenesis is a standard method for craniosynostosis. However, the technique using conventional devices still has some disadvantages, especially for anterior or posterior plagiocephaly with complex deformities. In the Nakajima’s angle-variable internal distraction (NAVID) system originally for maxillary surgeries, the cranial three-dimension (D) distractor with three dimensionally movable joint at the anterior arm has been developed recently in order to prevent the interference in the distraction process and excessive force.

Case reports

In this paper, we first reported two cases of anterior plagiocephaly, and one case of posterior plagiocephaly received distraction osteogenesis using new 3-D distractor in the NAVID system. In two cases of anterior plagiocephaly, the reshaping of supra-orbital bar in reference of simulating by the 3-D skull model was performed. In all cases, we fixed two paralleled 2-D distractors and a 3-D distractor in the upper frontal or parietal region.

Conclusion

Within the limitations of this study, we believe that the NAVID system is suitable for infant plagiocephaly due to the simple and small joint arm. Furthermore, the usage of the 3-D distractor would reduce the interference with 2-D distractors and easily lead to attainment of targeted distracting distance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yamashita M, Akai T, Kishibe M, Shimada K (2015) One-piece bone flap osteotomy using thread wire saw for fronto-orbital advancement with distraction osteogenesis in craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 31:279–283. doi:10.1007/s00381-014-2554-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hopper RA (2012) New trends in cranio-orbital and midface distraction for craniofacial dysostosis. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 20:298–303. doi:10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283543a43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nowinski D, Di Rocco F, Renier D, Sainterose C, Leikola J, Arnaud E (2012) Posterior cranial vault expansion in the treatment of craniosynostosis. Comparison of current techniques. Childs Nerv Syst 28:1537–1544. doi:10.1007/s00381-012-1809-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Akai T, Iizuka H, Kawakami S (2006) Treatment of craniosynostosis by distraction osteogenesis. Pediatr Neurosurg 42:288–292. doi:10.1159/000094064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakajima H, Sakamoto Y, Tamada I, Ohara H, Kishi K (2012) An internal distraction device for Le Fort distraction osteogenesis: the NAVID system. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65:61–67. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2011.08.009

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, Thorne CH, Grayson BH (1992) Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 89:1–8 discussion 9–10. doi:10.1097/00006534-199289010-00001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirabayashi S, Sugawara Y, Sakurai A, Harii K, Park S (1998) Frontoorbital advancement by gradual distraction. Technical note. J Neurosurg 89:1058–1061. doi:10.3171/jns.1998.89.6.1058

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sugawara Y, Hirabayashi S, Sakurai A, Harii K (1998) Gradual cranial vault expansion for the treatment of craniofacial synostosis: a preliminary report. Ann Plast Surg 40:554–565. doi:10.1097/00000637-199805000-00021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nagasaka M, Kato M, Osawa H (2012) Classification and surgical management of syndromic and multiple suture craniosynostosis. Nerv Syst Child 37:307–317(Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Akai T, Shiraga S, Sasagawa Y, Iizuka H, Yamashita M, Kawakami S (2013) Troubleshooting distraction osteogenesis for craniosynostosis. Pediatr Neurosurg 49:380–383. doi:10.1159/000369029

  11. Imai K, Komune H, Toda C, Nomachi T, Enoki E, Sakamoto H, Kitano S, Hatoko M, Fujimoto T (2002) Cranial remodeling to treat craniosynostosis by gradual distraction using a new device. J Neurosurg 96:654–659. doi:10.3171/jns.2002.96.4.0654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

We did not receive any equipment, materials, or financial support from outside, to conduct this study. None of the authors has a financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs mentioned in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hirokatsu Osawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Osawa, H., Kato, M., Nagakura, M. et al. The usage of the three-dimension distractor in the NAVID system for plagiocephaly—three case reports. Childs Nerv Syst 31, 2387–2390 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2817-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2817-0

Keywords

Navigation