Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Excellent functional outcome following selective dorsal rhizotomy in a child with spasticity secondary to transverse myelitis

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is a neurosurgical procedure used to treat spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (CP). The vast majority of studies to date suggest SDR is particularly effective in reducing lower limb spasticity in spastic diplegia with long-lasting effect.

Method

We report, to the best of our knowledge for the first time, the case of a teenager who underwent SDR for the management of spasticity secondary to transverse myelitis.

Results

This is an unusual indication for SDR which resulted in completely loose lower limbs and an excellent functional outcome. At a follow-up 18 months following the procedure, the child had no re-occurrence of his symptoms.

Conclusion

This report raises the possibility that the use of SDR could be expanded to include other pathologies. We discuss the case and the relevant literature. Our spasticity service at NUH has to date inserted 300 baclofen pumps and performed 60 SDRs mainly in children with cerebral palsy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mandigo CE, Anderson RC (2006) Management of childhood spasticity: a neurosurgical perspective. Pediatr Ann 35(5):354–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Trost JP, Schwartz MH, Krach LE, Dunn ME, Novacheck TF (2008) Comprehensive short-term outcome assessment of selective dorsal rhizotomy. Dev Med Child Neurol 50(10):765–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mittal S, Farmer JP, Al-Atassi B et al (2002) Long-term functional outcome after selective posterior rhizotomy. J Neurosurg 97(2):315–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang TF, Lee SS, Lin PH, Chen H, Chan RC (2002) Effect of selective posterior rhizotomy on transverse myelitis in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 81(6):467–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nordmark E, Josenby AL, Lagergren J, Andersson G, Stromblad LG, Westbom L (2008) Long-term outcomes five years after selective dorsal rhizotomy. BMC Pediatr 8:54

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van Schie PE, Schothorst M, Dallmeijer AJ et al (2011) Short- and long-term effects of selective dorsal rhizotomy on gross motor function in ambulatory children with spastic diplegia. J Neurosurg Pediatr 7(5):557–562

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Engsberg JR, Ross SA, Wagner JM, Park TS (2002) Changes in hip spasticity and strength following selective dorsal rhizotomy and physical therapy for spastic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 44(4):220–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tedroff K, Lowing K, Jacobson DN, Astrom E (2011) Does loss of spasticity matter? A 10-year follow-up after selective dorsal rhizotomy in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 53(8):724–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Josenby AL, Wagner P, Jarnlo GB, Westbom L, Nordmark E (2012) Motor function after selective dorsal rhizotomy: a 10-year practice-based follow-up study. Dev Med Child Neurol 54(5):429–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Subramanian N, Vaughan CL, Peter JC, Arens LJ (1998) Gait before and 10 years after rhizotomy in children with cerebral palsy spasticity. J Neurosurg 88(6):1014–1019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dudley RW, Parolin M, Gagnon B et al (2013) Long-term functional benefits of selective dorsal rhizotomy for spastic cerebral palsy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 12(2):142–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Langerak NG, Tam N, Vaughan CL, Fieggen AG, Schwartz MH (2012) Gait status 17–26 years after selective dorsal rhizotomy. Gait Posture 35(2):244–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Langerak NG, Lamberts RP, Fieggen AG, Peter JC, Peacock WJ, Vaughan CL (2009) Functional status of patients with cerebral palsy according to the international classification of functioning, disability and health model: a 20-year follow-up study after selective dorsal rhizotomy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90(6):994–1003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oki A, Oberg W, Siebert B, Plante D, Walker ML, Gooch JL (2010) Selective dorsal rhizotomy in children with spastic hemiparesis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 6(4):353–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gump WC, Mutchnick IS, Moriarty TM (2013) Selective dorsal rhizotomy for spasticity not associated with cerebral palsy: reconsideration of surgical inclusion criteria. Neurosurg Focus 35(5):E6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK

    N. K. Mazarakis, I. Ughratdar & M. H. Vloeberghs

Authors
  1. N. K. Mazarakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. Ughratdar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. H. Vloeberghs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. K. Mazarakis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazarakis, N.K., Ughratdar, I. & Vloeberghs, M.H. Excellent functional outcome following selective dorsal rhizotomy in a child with spasticity secondary to transverse myelitis. Childs Nerv Syst 31, 2189–2191 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2779-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2779-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation