Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neurotoxic effect of povidone–iodine on the rat spine using a laminectomy–durotomy model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The efficacy and safety of povidone–iodine in wound dressing and irrigation of some operative cavities were established by many in vitro and in vivo experimental reports and clinical series. However, its use in defective tissue in neural structures has not been confirmed yet. The aim of the present study was to histopathologically investigate its effect on neural tissues when applied on the upper side of defective dura.

Methods

Wistar rats were randomly divided into two experimental groups: control and povidone–iodine groups. In the control group, durotomy was performed following laminectomy, and the spinal cord was covered with a dry sponge. In the study group, the same procedure was performed, but open duras were covered with a sponge that had been wetted with 0.1 % povidone–iodine solution. Three weeks after surgery, all experimental animals were sacrificed, and histopathological evaluations were conducted.

Results

Myelin changes were absent or minimal in all cases of the control group but were present as markedly increased myelin degeneration in nearly all cases in the study group. Axonal degeneration and hypoxic neuronal damage were absent in the control group, whereas they were marked in half of the study group. No statistically significant differences were established in Schwann cell proliferation, venous congestion, and lymphocytic proliferation between the two groups.

Conclusions

Based on the present study, 0.1 % povidone–iodine solution cannot be recommended for wound dressing for neural structures such as myelomeningocele cases because of possible damage to underlying neural tissues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van Den Broek PJ, Buys LMF, Van Furth R (1982) Interaction of povidone–iodine compounds, phagocytic cells, and microorganisms. Antimicrob Agents Chnnother 22:593–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burks IR (1998) Povidone–iodine solution in wound treatment. Phys Ther 78:212–218

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang FY, Chang MC, Wang ST, Yu WK, Liu CL, Chen TH (2006) Can povidoneiodine solution be used safely in a spinal surgery? Eur Spine J 15(6 Suppl):1005–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kloth LC, McCulloch JM (1995) The inflammatory response to wounding. In: McCulloch JM, Kloth LC, Feedar JA (eds) Wound healing: alternatives in management. FA Davis Co, Philadelphia, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  5. Daly TJ (1995) Contraction and re-epithelialization. In: McCulloch JM, Kloth LC, Feedar JA (eds) Wound healing: alternatives in management. FA Davis Co, Philadelphia, pp 32–46

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tatnall EM, Leigh IM, Gibson JR (1987) Comparative toxicity of antimicrobial agents on transformed keratinocytes. J Invest Dematol 89:316–317

    Google Scholar 

  7. Branemark PI, Albrektsson B, Lindstrom J, Lundborg G (1966) Local tissue effects of wound disinfectants. Acta Chir Scand 357:166–176

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Roberts AH, Rober’ FE, Hall RI, Thomas IH (1985) A prospective trial of prophylactic povidone iodine in lacerations of the hand. J Hand Surg 10(3 Suppl):370–374

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gravett A, Sterner S, Clinton JE, Ruiz E (1987) A trial of povidone iodine in the prevention of infection in sutured lacerations. Ann Emerg Med 16(2 Suppl):167–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldenheim PD (1993) An appraisal of povidone iodine and wound healing. Postgrad Med 69(3 Suppl):97–105

    Google Scholar 

  11. McLagarde JSB, Cohn I Jr (1978) Intraperitoneal povidone–iodine in experimental peritonitis. Ann Surg 6:613–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chundalama J, Wright JG (2007) The efficacy and risks of using povidone–iodine irrigation to prevent surgical site infection: an evidence-based review. Can J Surg 50(6 Suppl):473–481

    Google Scholar 

  13. Doan L, Piskoun B, Rosenberg AD, Blanck TJ, Phillips MS, Xu F (2012) In vitro antiseptic effects on viability of neuronal and Schwann cells. Reg Anesth Pain Med 37:131–138

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emrah Akcay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akcay, E., Ersahin, Y., Ozer, F. et al. Neurotoxic effect of povidone–iodine on the rat spine using a laminectomy–durotomy model. Childs Nerv Syst 28, 2071–2075 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-012-1885-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-012-1885-7

Keywords

Navigation