Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnostic delay of pediatric brain tumors in Israel: a retrospective risk factor analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Pediatric brain tumors (PBTs) are the most common solid tumors and the leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in childhood. Previous studies have shown a significant delay between the onset of symptoms and the diagnosis of these tumors. Delayed diagnosis of PBTs may lead to acute situations and irreversible neurological damage. In this study, we looked for the incidence of delayed diagnosis of PBTs in Israel. We tried to find the reasons for these delays and the associated risk factors in order to provide a feedback to the system for improved education and earlier diagnosis.

Methods

We analyzed the charts of 330 consecutive children aged 0–18 years diagnosed with brain tumors, between the years 1996 and 2004. In the cases where delay in diagnosis was suspected, further information was collected from a family interview.

Results

The average “time to diagnosis” was 7.7 months (SD ± 16.7). Symptomatic deterioration from the first symptom until diagnosis was found in about 50% of the cases. Unacceptable delay in diagnosis was found in 27% of the children. The major reason for delay was “delay in indicated imaging.” Symptoms that were found to be associated with delayed diagnosis were torticollis, ataxia, and motor dysfunction. Interestingly, the examination by specialists such as ophthalmologists or neurologists was also associated with delayed diagnosis.

Conclusions

There is an unacceptable rate of delay in the diagnostic process of PBTs in Israel. Greater awareness and familiarity with signs and symptoms associated with these tumors and lowering imaging threshold might minimize this phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armstrong DD, Giangaspero F (2003) Pediatric brain tumors: introduction. Brain Pathol 13:373–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bouffet E (2000) Common brain tumours in children: diagnosis and treatment. Paediatr Drugs 2:57–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Crawford JR, Santi MR, Vezina G, Myseros JS, Keating RF, LaFond DA, Rood BR, MacDonald TJ, Packer RJ (2007) CNS germ cell tumor (CNSGCT) of childhood: presentation and delayed diagnosis. Neurology 68:1668–1673

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dorner L, Fritsch MJ, Stark AM, Mehdorn HM (2007) Posterior fossa tumors in children: how long does it take to establish the diagnosis? Childs Nerv Syst 23:887–890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Edgeworth J, Bullock P, Bailey A, Gallagher A, Crouchman M (1996) Why are brain tumours still being missed? Arch Dis Child 74:148–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Flores LE, Williams DL, Bell BA, O'Brien M, Ragab AH (1986) Delay in the diagnosis of pediatric brain tumors. Am J Dis Child 140:684–686

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gottschling S, Graf N, Meyer S, Reinhard H, Krenn T, Rohrer T (2006) Intracranial germinoma: a rare but important differential diagnosis in children with growth retardation. Acta Paediatr 95:302–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Haimi M, Peretz Nahum M, Ben Arush MW (2004) Delay in diagnosis of children with cancer: a retrospective study of 315 children. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 21:37–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Keene DL, Hsu E, Ventureyra E (1999) Brain tumors in childhood and adolescence. Pediatr Neurol 20:198–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kukal K, Dobrovoljac M, Boltshauser E, Ammann RA, Grotzer MA (2009) Does diagnostic delay result in decreased survival in paediatric brain tumours? Eur J Pediatr 168:303–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumandas S, Per H, Gumus H, Tucer B, Yikilmaz A, Kontas O, Coskun A, Kurtsoy A (2006) Torticollis secondary to posterior fossa and cervical spinal cord tumors: report of five cases and literature review. Neurosurg Rev 29:333–338, discussion 338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mehta V, Chapman A, McNeely PD, Walling S, Howes WJ (2002) Latency between symptom onset and diagnosis of pediatric brain tumors: an Eastern Canadian geographic study. Neurosurgery 51:365–372, discussion 372–363

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Packer RJ (1999) Brain tumors in children. Arch Neurol 56:421–425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pollack IF (1999) Pediatric brain tumors. Semin Surg Oncol 16:73–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rickert CH (1998) Epidemiological features of brain tumors in the first 3 years of life. Childs Nerv Syst 14:547–550

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Walker AE, Robins M, Weinfeld FD (1985) Epidemiology of brain tumors: the national survey of intracranial neoplasms. Neurology 35:219–226

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilne S, Collier J, Kennedy C, Koller K, Grundy R, Walker D (2007) Presentation of childhood CNS tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 8:685–695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilne SH, Ferris RC, Nathwani A, Kennedy CR (2006) The presenting features of brain tumours: a review of 200 cases. Arch Dis Child 91:502–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Mrs. Orna Friedman (RN) and Mrs. Sigal Friedman for their assistance in this large study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shlomi Constantini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shay, V., Fattal-Valevski, A., Beni-Adani, L. et al. Diagnostic delay of pediatric brain tumors in Israel: a retrospective risk factor analysis. Childs Nerv Syst 28, 93–100 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-011-1564-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-011-1564-0

Keywords

Navigation