Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Frameless stereotactic procedures in pediatric patients: safety and diagnostic efficacy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic yield of a frameless method for stereotactic neurosurgical procedures in pediatric patients.

Methods

Twenty-two frameless stereotactic neurosurgical procedures (18 biopsies, 4 catheter placements), using a modified frameless stereotactic navigational system, were performed in 21 pediatric patients in our institution from 2004 to 2009. All procedures were performed by the senior authors (AAK, SC).

Results

We completed 18 biopsy procedures in 18 patients, yielding usable diagnostic specimens in 100% of the procedures. Of this biopsy group, two patients experienced an asymptomatic hemorrhage per CT, and one patient experienced a transient hemiparesis, recovering to baseline within 1 week after surgery. Four catheter placement procedures were completed in three patients, including one patient who had to have the procedure repeated. We had no peri-operative mortality or technical difficulties related to the catheter placements.

Conclusions

Frameless stereotactic neurosurgical procedures in the pediatric population are feasible and can be completed safely for histological tumor diagnosis as well as for accurate placement of intracranial catheters. This method has low rates of morbidity comparable to frame-based procedures, with the advantage of greater operative convenience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albright AL, Packer RJ, Zimmerman R, Rorke LB, Boyett J, Hammond GD (1993) Magnetic resonance scans should replace biopsies for the diagnosis of diffuse brain stem gliomas: a report from the Children’s Cancer Group. Neurosurgery 33:1026–1029, Discussion, 1029–1030

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Azeem SS, Origitano TC (2007) Ventricular catheter placement with a frameless neuronavigational system: a 1-year experience. Neurosurgery 60:243–247, Discussion, 247–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brainard JA, Prayson RA, Barnett GH (1997) Frozen section evaluation of stereotactic brain biopsies: diagnostic yield at the stereotactic target position in 188 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 121:481–484

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cartmill M, Punt J (1999) Diffuse brain stem glioma. A review of stereotactic biopsies. Childs Nerv Syst 15:235–237, Discussion, 238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dammers R, Haitsma IK, Schouten JW, Kros JM, Avezaat CJ, Vincent AJ (2008) Safety and efficacy of frameless and frame-based intracranial biopsy techniques. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150:23–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Daszkiewicz P (2001) Technical and diagnostic difficulties in stereotactic biopsy in children. Neurol Neurochir Pol 35:899–905

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Epstein F, Wisoff JH (1988) Intrinsic brainstem tumors in childhood: surgical indications. J Neurooncol 6:309–317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gil Z, Siomin V, Beni-Adani L, Sira B, Constantini S (2002) Ventricular catheter placement in children with hydrocephalus and small ventricles: the use of a frameless neuronavigation system. Childs Nerv Syst 18:26–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grossman R, Sadetzki S, Spiegelmann R, Ram Z (2005) Haemorrhagic complications and the incidence of asymptomatic bleeding associated with stereotactic brain biopsies. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147:627–631, Discussion, 631

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McGirt MJ, Woodworth GF, Coon AL, Frazier JM, Amundson E, Garonzik I, Olivi A, Weingart JD (2005) Independent predictors of morbidity after image-guided stereotactic brain biopsy: a risk assessment of 270 cases. J Neurosurg 102:897–901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Paleologos TS, Dorward NL, Wadley JP, Thomas DG (2001) Clinical validation of true frameless stereotactic biopsy: analysis of the first 125 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery 49:830–835, Discussion, 835–837

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rajshekhar V, Moorthy RK (2010) Status of stereotactic biopsy in children with brain stem masses: insights from a series of 106 patients. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 88:360–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Roujeau T, Machado G, Garnett MR, Miquel C, Puget S, Geoerger B, Grill J, Boddaert N, Di Rocco F, Zerah M, Sainte-Rose C (2007) Stereotactic biopsy of diffuse pontine lesions in children. J Neurosurg 107:1–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schumacher M, Schulte-Monting J, Stoeter P, Warmuth-Metz M, Solymosi L (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging compared with biopsy in the diagnosis of brainstem diseases of childhood: a multicenter review. J Neurosurg 106:111–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. St George EJ, Walsh AR, Sgouros S (2004) Stereotactic biopsy of brain tumours in the paediatric population. Childs Nerv Syst 20:163–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Steck J, Friedman WA (1995) Stereotactic biopsy of brainstem mass lesions. Surg Neurol 43:563–567, Discussion, 567–568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tilgner J, Herr M, Ostertag C, Volk B (2005) Validation of intraoperative diagnoses using smear preparations from stereotactic brain biopsies: intraoperative versus final diagnosis--influence of clinical factors. Neurosurgery 56:257–265, Discussion, 257–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Valdes-Gorcia J, Espinoza-Diaz DM, Paredes-Diaz E (1998) Stereotactic biopsy of brain stem and posterior fossa lesions in children. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 140:899–903

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Woodworth GF, McGirt MJ, Samdani A, Garonzik I, Olivi A, Weingart JD (2006) Frameless image-guided stereotactic brain biopsy procedure: diagnostic yield, surgical morbidity, and comparison with the frame-based technique. J Neurosurg 104:233–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew A. Kanner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parreño, M.G., Bo, X., Kanu, O.O. et al. Frameless stereotactic procedures in pediatric patients: safety and diagnostic efficacy. Childs Nerv Syst 27, 2137–2140 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-011-1506-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-011-1506-x

Keywords

Navigation